From: Erik V. <eri...@hc...> - 2008-11-10 22:43:17
|
> However, I disagree with the implication that we have > "enough" classes. > There is no empiric measurement we can take, no way of calculating an > exact number of classes that are "enough". > > If there's a better way to implement something, it shouldn't > matter how > many additional classes it requires. What's important is the benefits > brought to the code in terms of maintenance, scaling, and allowing us > humans to clearly understand what the code is doing. > > If that means we reorganize things into a larger number of > class files, > so be it. Of course. I only meant to avoid multiplying entities without necessity (if I may misuse Occam this way). Erik. |