Re: [Radmind-users] [Ext] Fwd: My mind is blown

[James R. <rey...@bi...>]

I won’t be the only one who deserves credit, especially if folks submit patches. And to be completely honest, even if I were the only one working on it, I don’t think I’d like my initials in it. I really like the 2.0 much more. It really has a way of saying the old roadmap is toast too.

Now that I think about it, what even happened to the old RSUG group who developed radmind. I know the individual developers moved on. But did Umich close down the group or did they all leave first?

James

On 2/7/22, 9:37 PM, "Rodd Kleinschmidt via Radmind-users" <rad...@li...> wrote:
WARNING: Stop. Think. Read. This is an external email.

(Whoops. Tried to send this as a full reply but the message body was too big and it got held.)

Great to hear your thoughts, James. What I agree with most is “...I keep seeing variances in my machines that I can’t track and I need to add the ability to ignore timestamps to get to the bottom of it.” I only manage university computer classrooms and drop-in labs. Uniformity and stability are paramount to our user experience and those qualities are more difficult to find in other Mac management products.
My only suggestion, if you find the fire to keep radmind going, is instead of "radmind 2.0,” go with “radmind-jr” — to both denote that the new work is an offspring and to give yourself some well-deserved credit.

Sincerely,

Rodd Kleinschmidt
Macintosh System Administrator / Computer Lab Manager
Information & Educational Technology