Re: [Rabbit-proxy-users] HTTPS
Brought to you by:
ernimril
From: Robert O. <ro...@kh...> - 2004-05-23 15:19:34
|
Costa Tsaousis wrote: >I am testing RabbIT2 for providing my users with an Internet Accelerator. >I have about 10.000 modems to serve > Ok, bigger than I expected. >It is not necessary to chain proxy SSL, but how >can I tell this to RabbIT2? > > Currently you can not, but you tell the clients to use another proxy for ssl. Having a proxy chain for ssl introduce latency and that is one of the things you want to minimize for a proxy accellerator (that is why you have keepalive/persistent connections in HTTP/1.1). Since none of the proxies in the chain can cache the content it does not make much sense to have a chain for ssl. Client setup instructions may be simpler and your firewall setup may also be easier. I will look more at rabbit and see if I can fix the problem you have, so hopefully you wont have to tell rabbit anything. > <>Up to now, I plan the whole setup as follows: ... > What do you think? Well your setup makes sense. It is a bigger setup than I expected and for big sites you want redundancy and failover. So having squid for caching and load balancing seems wise. Having 1.5 TB of cache for rabbit is also something I would recomend against (rabbit was not designed for that size it was designed to handle a couple of GB, may work for a bit more, but that is untested). So having the netcaches behind rabbit seems like a good idea. And to be honest, I have not handled that many clients myself with any proxy so you are probably better qualified to design the setup. Have fun /robo |