[quirks-uvm-devel] Library conception

[Max <rez...@us...>]

Sergei Lodyagin wrote:
>>   po.code = ftell (out_file);
>> --------^^^-------
>>
>> It seems ftell return -1 for stdin which is unaccepteble for next code.
>>
> OK. Well. It wasn't a good idea. (I tried perform verification of code 
> by fixing
> a file offset while writing and check it when reading the file. But in 
> all other cases,
> *.ru files are always processed with sequential access).
> I think throw out all ftell stuff from the VM code. But before it I 
> think make a full
> specification of binary code module format. It doesn't really need store 
> positions
> (as  the ftell make)
> 
Actually I dont insist on stdout writing. I was just surprised.

> Regarding this, I think about whether to make a binary code cat - 
> indifferent.
> For example. You have 2 files:
> 
> module1.ru
> module2.ru
> 
> Then I can paste together them in one module by `cat':
> 
> cat module1.ru  module2.ru   > module.ru.
> 
> 
> It is when I found a feature but don't known is it useful or not
> (but actually, the coding of our binary files makes possible such 
> procedures).
> 
> How do you think, is it useful feature?
> 
It depends on library architecture you choise.
How do you intend to build it?
For instance I need to call a procedure from other module.
I need ProcedureId to do this.
How can I know ProcedureId by Module Name + Procedure Name?
All procedures from a module are numerated from 1. Right?
If you merge two modules how can you distinguish first procedure
from first module and from second module?


Max