quickfixj-users

[Quickfixj-users] QuoteRequest.set(QuoteRequestType) and various other set methods missing?

[Nick F. <ni...@ox...>]

Hi all,

I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here. QuoteRequest in the javadoc on
the website (
http://www.quickfixj.org/quickfixj/javadoc/quickfix/fix43/QuoteRequest.html)
doesn't have a method:

  public void set(quickfix.field.QuoteRequestType value)

The method is also missing in the quickfix.jar if you download 1.1.0 from
sourceforge. This is true for 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4.

In the source code (downloaded with quickfixj-1.1.0) the method does exist.
Can anyone explain what is going on? I know I can call setField(), but I was
hoping for the typesafe version.

Nick

Re: [Quickfixj-users] QuoteRequest.set(QuoteRequestType) and variousother set methods missing?

[Steve B. <st...@te...>]

Hi Nick,

 

The method is in the nested class NoRelatedSym (repeating group).

 

Steve

 

  _____  

From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Nick
Fortescue
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 4:44 AM
To: qui...@li...
Subject: [Quickfixj-users] QuoteRequest.set(QuoteRequestType) and
variousother set methods missing?

 

Hi all,

 

I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here. QuoteRequest in the javadoc on
the website
(http://www.quickfixj.org/quickfixj/javadoc/quickfix/fix43/QuoteRequest.html
)  doesn't have a method:

 

  public void set(quickfix.field.QuoteRequestType value)

 

The method is also missing in the quickfix.jar if you download 1.1.0 from
sourceforge. This is true for 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4.

 

In the source code (downloaded with quickfixj-1.1.0) the method does exist.
Can anyone explain what is going on? I know I can call setField(), but I was
hoping for the typesafe version.

 

Nick

Re: [Quickfixj-users] QuoteRequest.set(QuoteRequestType) and variousother set methods missing?

[Nick F. <ni...@ox...>]

Thanks very much. A suggestion which might reduce the number of stupid
questions from foolish people like me. Could the code to generate these
classes from the spec be changed to adjust the indentation so that methods
in nested classes look nested?

Nick

On 6/6/07, Steve Bate <st...@te...> wrote:
>
> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>
>
>  Hi Nick,
>
>
>
> The method is in the nested class NoRelatedSym (repeating group).
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* qui...@li... [mailto:
> qui...@li...] *On Behalf Of *Nick
> Fortescue
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 06, 2007 4:44 AM
> *To:* qui...@li...
> *Subject:* [Quickfixj-users] QuoteRequest.set(QuoteRequestType) and
> variousother set methods missing?
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here. QuoteRequest in the javadoc
> on the website (http://www.quickfixj.org/quickfixj/javadoc/quickfix/fix43/QuoteRequest.html
> )  doesn't have a method:
>
>
>
>   public void set(quickfix.field.QuoteRequestType value)
>
>
>
> The method is also missing in the quickfix.jar if you download 1.1.0 from
> sourceforge. This is true for 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4.
>
>
>
> In the source code (downloaded with quickfixj-1.1.0) the method does
> exist. Can anyone explain what is going on? I know I can call setField(),
> but I was hoping for the typesafe version.
>
>
>
> Nick
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfixj-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
>
>

Re: [Quickfixj-users] QuoteRequest.set(QuoteRequestType) and variousother set methods missing?

[Toli K. <to...@ma...>]

Nick,

That's a great suggestion. It's actually not that easy to do the
formatting directly in code-generating XSLT, but we can run an ant
task on it afterwards to do it. Is there anything other than Jalopy
that people have used before?

i've created an RFE for this, so post your comments there:
http://www.quickfixj.org/jira/browse/QFJ-192

On 6/6/07, Nick Fortescue <ni...@ox...> wrote:
>
> Thanks very much. A suggestion which might reduce the number of stupid
> questions from foolish people like me. Could the code to generate these
> classes from the spec be changed to adjust the indentation so that methods
> in nested classes look nested?


-- 
Toli Kuznets
http://www.marketcetera.com: Open-Source Trading Platform
download.run.trade.