Hey all,
I have a question about the way you think that UtcTimeStampField
should preserve milliseconds.
This is related to bug qfj-146: http://www.quickfixj.org/jira/browse/QFJ-146.
I'm testing the QFJ-1.1 RC1 candidate, and i noticed that the way i've
implemented the fix for the bug makes the milliseconds be created only
if it is specified, and the default behaviour is not to preserve
milliseconds.
I'm starting to think that's incorrect behaviour - and that it may
make more sense to *always* preserve milliseconds. So I would make
appropriate changes to the UtcTimeStampField.
Any other thoughts on this? Is there a particular
backwards-compatibility use case where we don't want to make that
change?
--
Toli Kuznets
http://www.marketcetera.com: Open-Source Trading Platform
download.run.trade.
|
