Menu
▾
▴
quickfixj-users — General mailing list for QuickFIX/J topics.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(13) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(27) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(50) |
Mar
(90) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(58) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(52) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(72) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(47) |
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(59) |
Oct
(77) |
Nov
(51) |
Dec
(54) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(57) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(44) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(69) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(37) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(20) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(93) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(151) |
Jun
(77) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(94) |
Dec
(59) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(105) |
Feb
(43) |
Mar
(68) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(103) |
Aug
(77) |
Sep
(45) |
Oct
(59) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(43) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(48) |
Feb
(65) |
Mar
(63) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(60) |
Jul
(43) |
Aug
(17) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(42) |
Dec
(43) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(54) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(31) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(66) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(52) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(67) |
Dec
(70) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(62) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(86) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(61) |
Oct
(65) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(30) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(51) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(40) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(121) |
Jun
(55) |
Jul
(37) |
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(109) |
Nov
(67) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(49) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(37) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(67) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(70) |
Jun
(33) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
|
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(10) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2024 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2025 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Peter W. <pw...@bl...> - 2006-11-03 14:35:32
|
Thanks to Steve for a long and very helpful contribution. You might be = on to something in respect of sequence numbers. However, my problem is that = "I" am not doing anything at this level. All I have done is: 1) Modify the Executor example to write messages/logs to disc. 2) Added some code to the Application Class so that a sensible sample = order fill would be returned. 3) Played with the configuration file to (hopefully) get the session settings right: I am not setting/interfering with number sequencing or any stuff like = that. That all happens under the hood and before it gets to my code. Config file is: [DEFAULT] BeginString=3DFIX.4.3 ConnectionType=3Dacceptor ReconnectInterval=3D60 StartDay=3Dsunday StartTime=3D19:00:00 EndDay=3Dsaturday EndTime=3D18:00:00 MillisecondsInTimestamp=3DY UseDataDictionary=3DY DataDictionary=3DFIX43.xml FileStorePath=3Doutput/data/executor FileLogPath=3Doutput/data/executor HeartBtInt=3D30 SocketAcceptPort=3D9876 SocketAcceptAddress=3D218.25.25.66 [SESSION] SenderCompID=3DSFCTRADE_TEST TargetCompID=3DAPC_TEST Peter -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of qui...@li... Sent: 03 November 2006 12:55 To: qui...@li... Subject: Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 3 Send Quickfixj-users mailing list submissions to qui...@li... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to qui...@li... You can reach the person managing the list at qui...@li... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Quickfixj-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Session is not current (Peter Warder) 2. Re: Session is not current (Steve Bate) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:51:02 -0000 From: "Peter Warder" <pw...@bl...> Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: <qui...@li...> Message-ID: <000501c6ff3e$5730a9a0$0300a8c0@HAL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" Hi Matyas, Thank you for that thought. I have tried hard to synchronize the = computer clocks but maybe not successfully. I'll look at the initiator logs and compare times. Does the event log entry 'No responder, not sending = message' Mean anything to anyone? Thanks again to Steve and Matyas for your help. Peter Warder=20 -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of qui...@li... Sent: 02 November 2006 20:30 To: qui...@li... Subject: Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 2 Send Quickfixj-users mailing list submissions to qui...@li... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to qui...@li... You can reach the person managing the list at qui...@li... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Quickfixj-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Session is not current (Peter Warder) 2. Re: Session is not current (Matyas Barakonyi) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:23:03 -0000 From: "Peter Warder" <pw...@bl...> Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: <qui...@li...> Message-ID: <000001c6fe71$46471160$0300a8c0@HAL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" Steve, Thank you for your response. I understand that the log message does not necessarily mean a problem. The problem is that the acceptor is replying = to the Logon message with a Logout (35=3D5) so we can never get a = conversation started. The initiator is an established FIX engine (quickfix C version) already successfully talking with other institutions. So using Banzai wont help. Thanks, Peter Warder London I've posted the event log below: 20061101-15:26:03: Session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST schedule is weekly, SUN 19:00:00 UTC - SAT 18:00:00 UTC 20061101-15:26:03: Session state is not current; resetting FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST 20061101-15:26:03: No responder, not sending message 20061101-15:26:03: Valid order types: [1] 20061101-15:26:03: Created session: FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST 20061101-15:26:42: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4847 20061101-15:26:42: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:26:42: Disconnecting 20061101-15:27:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4848 20061101-15:27:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:27:43: Disconnecting 20061101-15:28:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4849 20061101-15:28:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:28:43: Disconnecting 20061101-15:29:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4850 20061101-15:29:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:29:43: Disconnecting And the message log: 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D17=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:26:43.135=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D207=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:26:42.750=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D051=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D19=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:27:43.438=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D216=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:27:43.000=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D041=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D21=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:28:43.691=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D211=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:28:43.250=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D049=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D23=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:29:43.933=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D213=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:29:43.484=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D059=01 -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of qui...@li... Sent: 01 November 2006 22:31 To: qui...@li... Subject: Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 Send Quickfixj-users mailing list submissions to qui...@li... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to qui...@li... You can reach the person managing the list at qui...@li... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Quickfixj-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Session is not current (Peter Warder) 2. Re: Session is not current (st...@te...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:15:07 -0000 From: "Peter Warder" <pw...@bl...> Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: <qui...@li...> Message-ID: <000001c6fdd0$e717a830$0300a8c0@HAL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" Hi, I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very experienced developer. I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor example) and have made decent progress. I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout message = is returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a message = that the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix it. Any ideas?? (logs attached) Peter Warder London -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.messages.log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 772 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/atta= chmen ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment.obj=20 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.event.log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1105 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/atta= chmen ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment-0001.obj=20 ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:42:09 -0500 (EST) From: st...@te... Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: pe...@ss..., qui...@li... Message-ID: <106...@we...> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=3Diso-8859-1 That log message doesn't necessarily indicate a problem. It's telling = you that you have begun a new session (based on your session start/end schedule) and it's going to reset the message store and sequence = numbers. This may or may not be a problem depending on the context. It appears you are using the example order executor for your test. Have you tried running Banzai as a client to the executor with the configuration changed slightly for your scenario? Steve > QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ > QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ > Hi, > > I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very > experienced developer. > I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor > example) and have made decent progress. > I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an > initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout = message is > returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a = message > that > the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix > it. > Any ideas?? (logs attached) > > Peter Warder > London > = -------------------------------------------------------------------------= > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642____ ___________________________________________ > Quickfixj-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Quickfixj-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users End of Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 ********************************************* ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 12:50:48 +0100 From: Matyas Barakonyi <ma...@ba...> Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: pe...@ss..., qui...@li... Message-ID: <454...@ba...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1; format=3Dflowed Hi! I had a similar problem few mounths ago... The session could not be=20 established. It was a time sinchronization problem between the 2 computers. It was=20 only a 0.5 min, but the accptor can't process the msg of the = initiator... I'm wondering if this couldn't be a problem in your case... Regards, Matyas >QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ >QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ >Steve, > >Thank you for your response. I understand that the log message does not >necessarily mean a problem. The problem is that the acceptor is = replying to >the Logon message with a Logout (35=3D5) so we can never get a = conversation >started. > >The initiator is an established FIX engine (quickfix C version) already >successfully talking with other institutions. So using Banzai wont = help. > >Thanks, >Peter Warder >London > >I've posted the event log below: > >20061101-15:26:03: Session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST schedule is >weekly, SUN 19:00:00 UTC - SAT 18:00:00 UTC >20061101-15:26:03: Session state is not current; resetting >FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST >20061101-15:26:03: No responder, not sending message >20061101-15:26:03: Valid order types: [1] >20061101-15:26:03: Created session: FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST >20061101-15:26:42: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4847 >20061101-15:26:42: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:26:42: Disconnecting >20061101-15:27:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4848 >20061101-15:27:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:27:43: Disconnecting >20061101-15:28:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4849 >20061101-15:28:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:28:43: Disconnecting >20061101-15:29:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4850 >20061101-15:29:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:29:43: Disconnecting > >And the message log: >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D17=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:26:43.135=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D207=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:26:42.750=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D051=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D19=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:27:43.438=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D216=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:27:43.000=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D041=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D21=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:28:43.691=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D211=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:28:43.250=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D049=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D23=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:29:43.933=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D213=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:29:43.484=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D059=01 > > >-----Original Message----- >From: qui...@li... >[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of >qui...@li... >Sent: 01 November 2006 22:31 >To: qui...@li... >Subject: Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 > >Send Quickfixj-users mailing list submissions to > qui...@li... > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > qui...@li... > >You can reach the person managing the list at > qui...@li... > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Quickfixj-users digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Session is not current (Peter Warder) > 2. Re: Session is not current (st...@te...) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:15:07 -0000 >From: "Peter Warder" <pw...@bl...> >Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current >To: <qui...@li...> >Message-ID: <000001c6fdd0$e717a830$0300a8c0@HAL> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" > >Hi, > >I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very >experienced developer. >I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor >example) and have made decent progress. >I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an >initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout message = is >returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a message that >the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix >it. >Any ideas?? (logs attached) > >Peter Warder >London >-------------- next part -------------- >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.messages.log >Type: application/octet-stream >Size: 772 bytes >Desc: not available >Url : >http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/att= achme n >ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment.obj=20 >-------------- next part -------------- >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.event.log >Type: application/octet-stream >Size: 1105 bytes >Desc: not available >Url : >http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/att= achme n >ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment-0001.obj=20 > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:42:09 -0500 (EST) >From: st...@te... >Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current >To: pe...@ss..., qui...@li... >Message-ID: > <106...@we...> >Content-Type: text/plain;charset=3Diso-8859-1 > >That log message doesn't necessarily indicate a problem. It's telling = you >that you have begun a new session (based on your session start/end >schedule) and it's going to reset the message store and sequence = numbers. >This may or may not be a problem depending on the context. > >It appears you are using the example order executor for your test. Have >you tried running Banzai as a client to the executor with the >configuration changed slightly for your scenario? > >Steve > > =20 > >>QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ >>QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ >>Hi, >> >>I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very >>experienced developer. >>I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor >>example) and have made decent progress. >>I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an >>initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout = message is >>returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a = message >>that >>the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix >>it. >>Any ideas?? (logs attached) >> >>Peter Warder >>London >>-----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- >>Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? >>Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job >>easier >>Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo >> >> =20 >> >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642___ _ >___________________________________________ > =20 > >>Quickfixj-users mailing list >>Qui...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users >> >> =20 >> > > > > > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------------------------------------------------= - >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job >easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Quickfixj-users mailing list >Qui...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > > >End of Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 >********************************************* > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------= - >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 >_______________________________________________ >Quickfixj-users mailing list >Qui...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > =20 > ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Quickfixj-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users End of Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 2 ********************************************* ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 07:54:07 -0500 From: "Steve Bate" <st...@te...> Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: <qui...@li...> Message-ID: <200...@ea...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" Hi Peter, The time offsets can cause a problem in some cases but your log = indicates that the offset is less than a few seconds and normally that would not cause the login to be rejected unless MaxLatency was configured to a = very small value. The message not sent log event means that a message send was attempted before a connection was established. This is an informational message since the message will eventually be sent once the session is = established. The timestamp on the log event doesn't match any of the messages in the message log you provided. An outgoing message should have been logged=20 at the time the event was logged. The reason I suggested using Banzai with your configuration is that these problems are often caused by incorrect configurations. If Banzai works with your configuration then it would be good to investigate the application behavior further. If Banzai shows the same behavior, it's probably the configuration file although it could be some environment issue (like the time offset suggestion, for example). The other common cause is a sequence number problem. One strange thing I see is that you have reset your session which implies the sequence numbers have been reset to 1. However, the = initiator is semding a sequence number of 17. A sequence number that is too high will cause an immediate disconnect by the acceptor. However, I'd=20 expect to see a logged event. Are you sure your initiator is resetting it's sequence numbers in a way consistent with the acceptor? Regards, Steve -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of = Peter Warder Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 6:51 AM To: qui...@li... Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ Hi Matyas, Thank you for that thought. I have tried hard to synchronize the = computer clocks but maybe not successfully. I'll look at the initiator logs and compare times. Does the event log entry 'No responder, not sending = message' Mean anything to anyone? Thanks again to Steve and Matyas for your help. Peter Warder=20 -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of qui...@li... Sent: 02 November 2006 20:30 To: qui...@li... Subject: Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 2 Send Quickfixj-users mailing list submissions to qui...@li... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to qui...@li... You can reach the person managing the list at qui...@li... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Quickfixj-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Session is not current (Peter Warder) 2. Re: Session is not current (Matyas Barakonyi) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:23:03 -0000 From: "Peter Warder" <pw...@bl...> Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: <qui...@li...> Message-ID: <000001c6fe71$46471160$0300a8c0@HAL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" Steve, Thank you for your response. I understand that the log message does not necessarily mean a problem. The problem is that the acceptor is replying = to the Logon message with a Logout (35=3D5) so we can never get a = conversation started. The initiator is an established FIX engine (quickfix C version) already successfully talking with other institutions. So using Banzai wont help. Thanks, Peter Warder London I've posted the event log below: 20061101-15:26:03: Session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST schedule is weekly, SUN 19:00:00 UTC - SAT 18:00:00 UTC 20061101-15:26:03: Session state is not current; resetting FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST 20061101-15:26:03: No responder, not sending message 20061101-15:26:03: Valid order types: [1] 20061101-15:26:03: Created session: FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST 20061101-15:26:42: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4847 20061101-15:26:42: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:26:42: Disconnecting 20061101-15:27:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4848 20061101-15:27:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:27:43: Disconnecting 20061101-15:28:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4849 20061101-15:28:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:28:43: Disconnecting 20061101-15:29:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4850 20061101-15:29:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:29:43: Disconnecting And the message log: 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D17=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:26:43.135=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D207=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:26:42.750=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D051=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D19=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:27:43.438=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D216=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:27:43.000=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D041=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D21=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:28:43.691=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D211=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:28:43.250=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D049=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D23=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:29:43.933=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D213=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:29:43.484=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D059=01 -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of qui...@li... Sent: 01 November 2006 22:31 To: qui...@li... Subject: Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 Send Quickfixj-users mailing list submissions to qui...@li... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to qui...@li... You can reach the person managing the list at qui...@li... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Quickfixj-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Session is not current (Peter Warder) 2. Re: Session is not current (st...@te...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:15:07 -0000 From: "Peter Warder" <pw...@bl...> Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: <qui...@li...> Message-ID: <000001c6fdd0$e717a830$0300a8c0@HAL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" Hi, I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very experienced developer. I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor example) and have made decent progress. I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout message = is returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a message = that the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix it. Any ideas?? (logs attached) Peter Warder London -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.messages.log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 772 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/atta= chmen ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment.obj=20 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.event.log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1105 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/atta= chmen ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment-0001.obj=20 ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:42:09 -0500 (EST) From: st...@te... Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: pe...@ss..., qui...@li... Message-ID: <106...@we...> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=3Diso-8859-1 That log message doesn't necessarily indicate a problem. It's telling = you that you have begun a new session (based on your session start/end schedule) and it's going to reset the message store and sequence = numbers. This may or may not be a problem depending on the context. It appears you are using the example order executor for your test. Have you tried running Banzai as a client to the executor with the configuration changed slightly for your scenario? Steve > QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ > QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ > Hi, > > I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very > experienced developer. > I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor > example) and have made decent progress. > I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an > initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout = message is > returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a = message > that > the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix > it. > Any ideas?? (logs attached) > > Peter Warder > London > = -------------------------------------------------------------------------= > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642____ ___________________________________________ > Quickfixj-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Quickfixj-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users End of Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 ********************************************* ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 12:50:48 +0100 From: Matyas Barakonyi <ma...@ba...> Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: pe...@ss..., qui...@li... Message-ID: <454...@ba...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1; format=3Dflowed Hi! I had a similar problem few mounths ago... The session could not be=20 established. It was a time sinchronization problem between the 2 computers. It was=20 only a 0.5 min, but the accptor can't process the msg of the = initiator... I'm wondering if this couldn't be a problem in your case... Regards, Matyas >QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ >QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ >Steve, > >Thank you for your response. I understand that the log message does not >necessarily mean a problem. The problem is that the acceptor is = replying to >the Logon message with a Logout (35=3D5) so we can never get a = conversation >started. > >The initiator is an established FIX engine (quickfix C version) already >successfully talking with other institutions. So using Banzai wont = help. > >Thanks, >Peter Warder >London > >I've posted the event log below: > >20061101-15:26:03: Session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST schedule is >weekly, SUN 19:00:00 UTC - SAT 18:00:00 UTC >20061101-15:26:03: Session state is not current; resetting >FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST >20061101-15:26:03: No responder, not sending message >20061101-15:26:03: Valid order types: [1] >20061101-15:26:03: Created session: FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST >20061101-15:26:42: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4847 >20061101-15:26:42: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:26:42: Disconnecting >20061101-15:27:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4848 >20061101-15:27:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:27:43: Disconnecting >20061101-15:28:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4849 >20061101-15:28:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:28:43: Disconnecting >20061101-15:29:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4850 >20061101-15:29:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:29:43: Disconnecting > >And the message log: >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D17=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:26:43.135=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D207=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:26:42.750=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D051=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D19=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:27:43.438=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D216=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:27:43.000=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D041=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D21=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:28:43.691=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D211=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:28:43.250=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D049=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D23=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:29:43.933=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D213=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:29:43.484=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D059=01 > > >-----Original Message----- >From: qui...@li... >[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of >qui...@li... >Sent: 01 November 2006 22:31 >To: qui...@li... >Subject: Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 > >Send Quickfixj-users mailing list submissions to > qui...@li... > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > qui...@li... > >You can reach the person managing the list at > qui...@li... > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Quickfixj-users digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Session is not current (Peter Warder) > 2. Re: Session is not current (st...@te...) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:15:07 -0000 >From: "Peter Warder" <pw...@bl...> >Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current >To: <qui...@li...> >Message-ID: <000001c6fdd0$e717a830$0300a8c0@HAL> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" > >Hi, > >I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very >experienced developer. >I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor >example) and have made decent progress. >I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an >initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout message = is >returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a message that >the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix >it. >Any ideas?? (logs attached) > >Peter Warder >London >-------------- next part -------------- >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.messages.log >Type: application/octet-stream >Size: 772 bytes >Desc: not available >Url : >http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/att= achme n >ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment.obj=20 >-------------- next part -------------- >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.event.log >Type: application/octet-stream >Size: 1105 bytes >Desc: not available >Url : >http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/att= achme n >ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment-0001.obj=20 > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:42:09 -0500 (EST) >From: st...@te... >Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current >To: pe...@ss..., qui...@li... >Message-ID: > <106...@we...> >Content-Type: text/plain;charset=3Diso-8859-1 > >That log message doesn't necessarily indicate a problem. It's telling = you >that you have begun a new session (based on your session start/end >schedule) and it's going to reset the message store and sequence = numbers. >This may or may not be a problem depending on the context. > >It appears you are using the example order executor for your test. Have >you tried running Banzai as a client to the executor with the >configuration changed slightly for your scenario? > >Steve > > =20 > >>QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ >>QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ >>Hi, >> >>I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very >>experienced developer. >>I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor >>example) and have made decent progress. >>I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an >>initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout = message is >>returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a = message >>that >>the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix >>it. >>Any ideas?? (logs attached) >> >>Peter Warder >>London >>-----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- >>Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? >>Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job >>easier >>Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo >> >> =20 >> >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642___ _ >___________________________________________ > =20 > >>Quickfixj-users mailing list >>Qui...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users >> >> =20 >> > > > > > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------------------------------------------------= - >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job >easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Quickfixj-users mailing list >Qui...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > > >End of Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 >********************************************* > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------= - >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 >_______________________________________________ >Quickfixj-users mailing list >Qui...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > =20 > ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Quickfixj-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users End of Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 2 ********************************************* -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 _______________________________________________ Quickfixj-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Quickfixj-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users End of Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 3 ********************************************* |
|
From: Steve B. <st...@te...> - 2006-11-03 12:54:36
|
Hi Peter, The time offsets can cause a problem in some cases but your log = indicates that the offset is less than a few seconds and normally that would not cause the login to be rejected unless MaxLatency was configured to a = very small value. The message not sent log event means that a message send was attempted before a connection was established. This is an informational message since the message will eventually be sent once the session is = established. The timestamp on the log event doesn't match any of the messages in the message log you provided. An outgoing message should have been logged=20 at the time the event was logged. The reason I suggested using Banzai with your configuration is that these problems are often caused by incorrect configurations. If Banzai works with your configuration then it would be good to investigate the application behavior further. If Banzai shows the same behavior, it's probably the configuration file although it could be some environment issue (like the time offset suggestion, for example). The other common cause is a sequence number problem. One strange thing I see is that you have reset your session which implies the sequence numbers have been reset to 1. However, the = initiator is semding a sequence number of 17. A sequence number that is too high will cause an immediate disconnect by the acceptor. However, I'd=20 expect to see a logged event. Are you sure your initiator is resetting it's sequence numbers in a way consistent with the acceptor? Regards, Steve -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of = Peter Warder Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 6:51 AM To: qui...@li... Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ Hi Matyas, Thank you for that thought. I have tried hard to synchronize the = computer clocks but maybe not successfully. I'll look at the initiator logs and compare times. Does the event log entry 'No responder, not sending = message' Mean anything to anyone? Thanks again to Steve and Matyas for your help. Peter Warder=20 -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of qui...@li... Sent: 02 November 2006 20:30 To: qui...@li... Subject: Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 2 Send Quickfixj-users mailing list submissions to qui...@li... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to qui...@li... You can reach the person managing the list at qui...@li... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Quickfixj-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Session is not current (Peter Warder) 2. Re: Session is not current (Matyas Barakonyi) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:23:03 -0000 From: "Peter Warder" <pw...@bl...> Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: <qui...@li...> Message-ID: <000001c6fe71$46471160$0300a8c0@HAL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" Steve, Thank you for your response. I understand that the log message does not necessarily mean a problem. The problem is that the acceptor is replying = to the Logon message with a Logout (35=3D5) so we can never get a = conversation started. The initiator is an established FIX engine (quickfix C version) already successfully talking with other institutions. So using Banzai wont help. Thanks, Peter Warder London I've posted the event log below: 20061101-15:26:03: Session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST schedule is weekly, SUN 19:00:00 UTC - SAT 18:00:00 UTC 20061101-15:26:03: Session state is not current; resetting FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST 20061101-15:26:03: No responder, not sending message 20061101-15:26:03: Valid order types: [1] 20061101-15:26:03: Created session: FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST 20061101-15:26:42: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4847 20061101-15:26:42: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:26:42: Disconnecting 20061101-15:27:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4848 20061101-15:27:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:27:43: Disconnecting 20061101-15:28:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4849 20061101-15:28:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:28:43: Disconnecting 20061101-15:29:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4850 20061101-15:29:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:29:43: Disconnecting And the message log: 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D17=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:26:43.135=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D207=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:26:42.750=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D051=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D19=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:27:43.438=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D216=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:27:43.000=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D041=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D21=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:28:43.691=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D211=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:28:43.250=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D049=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D23=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:29:43.933=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D213=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:29:43.484=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D059=01 -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of qui...@li... Sent: 01 November 2006 22:31 To: qui...@li... Subject: Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 Send Quickfixj-users mailing list submissions to qui...@li... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to qui...@li... You can reach the person managing the list at qui...@li... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Quickfixj-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Session is not current (Peter Warder) 2. Re: Session is not current (st...@te...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:15:07 -0000 From: "Peter Warder" <pw...@bl...> Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: <qui...@li...> Message-ID: <000001c6fdd0$e717a830$0300a8c0@HAL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" Hi, I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very experienced developer. I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor example) and have made decent progress. I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout message = is returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a message = that the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix it. Any ideas?? (logs attached) Peter Warder London -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.messages.log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 772 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/atta= chmen ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment.obj=20 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.event.log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1105 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/atta= chmen ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment-0001.obj=20 ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:42:09 -0500 (EST) From: st...@te... Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: pe...@ss..., qui...@li... Message-ID: <106...@we...> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=3Diso-8859-1 That log message doesn't necessarily indicate a problem. It's telling = you that you have begun a new session (based on your session start/end schedule) and it's going to reset the message store and sequence = numbers. This may or may not be a problem depending on the context. It appears you are using the example order executor for your test. Have you tried running Banzai as a client to the executor with the configuration changed slightly for your scenario? Steve > QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ > QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ > Hi, > > I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very > experienced developer. > I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor > example) and have made decent progress. > I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an > initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout = message is > returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a = message > that > the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix > it. > Any ideas?? (logs attached) > > Peter Warder > London > = -------------------------------------------------------------------------= > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642____ ___________________________________________ > Quickfixj-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Quickfixj-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users End of Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 ********************************************* ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 12:50:48 +0100 From: Matyas Barakonyi <ma...@ba...> Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: pe...@ss..., qui...@li... Message-ID: <454...@ba...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1; format=3Dflowed Hi! I had a similar problem few mounths ago... The session could not be=20 established. It was a time sinchronization problem between the 2 computers. It was=20 only a 0.5 min, but the accptor can't process the msg of the = initiator... I'm wondering if this couldn't be a problem in your case... Regards, Matyas >QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ >QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ >Steve, > >Thank you for your response. I understand that the log message does not >necessarily mean a problem. The problem is that the acceptor is = replying to >the Logon message with a Logout (35=3D5) so we can never get a = conversation >started. > >The initiator is an established FIX engine (quickfix C version) already >successfully talking with other institutions. So using Banzai wont = help. > >Thanks, >Peter Warder >London > >I've posted the event log below: > >20061101-15:26:03: Session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST schedule is >weekly, SUN 19:00:00 UTC - SAT 18:00:00 UTC >20061101-15:26:03: Session state is not current; resetting >FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST >20061101-15:26:03: No responder, not sending message >20061101-15:26:03: Valid order types: [1] >20061101-15:26:03: Created session: FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST >20061101-15:26:42: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4847 >20061101-15:26:42: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:26:42: Disconnecting >20061101-15:27:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4848 >20061101-15:27:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:27:43: Disconnecting >20061101-15:28:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4849 >20061101-15:28:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:28:43: Disconnecting >20061101-15:29:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4850 >20061101-15:29:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:29:43: Disconnecting > >And the message log: >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D17=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:26:43.135=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D207=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:26:42.750=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D051=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D19=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:27:43.438=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D216=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:27:43.000=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D041=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D21=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:28:43.691=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D211=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:28:43.250=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D049=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D23=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:29:43.933=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D213=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:29:43.484=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D059=01 > > >-----Original Message----- >From: qui...@li... >[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of >qui...@li... >Sent: 01 November 2006 22:31 >To: qui...@li... >Subject: Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 > >Send Quickfixj-users mailing list submissions to > qui...@li... > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > qui...@li... > >You can reach the person managing the list at > qui...@li... > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Quickfixj-users digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Session is not current (Peter Warder) > 2. Re: Session is not current (st...@te...) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:15:07 -0000 >From: "Peter Warder" <pw...@bl...> >Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current >To: <qui...@li...> >Message-ID: <000001c6fdd0$e717a830$0300a8c0@HAL> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" > >Hi, > >I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very >experienced developer. >I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor >example) and have made decent progress. >I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an >initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout message = is >returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a message that >the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix >it. >Any ideas?? (logs attached) > >Peter Warder >London >-------------- next part -------------- >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.messages.log >Type: application/octet-stream >Size: 772 bytes >Desc: not available >Url : >http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/att= achme n >ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment.obj=20 >-------------- next part -------------- >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.event.log >Type: application/octet-stream >Size: 1105 bytes >Desc: not available >Url : >http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/att= achme n >ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment-0001.obj=20 > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:42:09 -0500 (EST) >From: st...@te... >Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current >To: pe...@ss..., qui...@li... >Message-ID: > <106...@we...> >Content-Type: text/plain;charset=3Diso-8859-1 > >That log message doesn't necessarily indicate a problem. It's telling = you >that you have begun a new session (based on your session start/end >schedule) and it's going to reset the message store and sequence = numbers. >This may or may not be a problem depending on the context. > >It appears you are using the example order executor for your test. Have >you tried running Banzai as a client to the executor with the >configuration changed slightly for your scenario? > >Steve > > =20 > >>QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ >>QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ >>Hi, >> >>I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very >>experienced developer. >>I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor >>example) and have made decent progress. >>I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an >>initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout = message is >>returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a = message >>that >>the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix >>it. >>Any ideas?? (logs attached) >> >>Peter Warder >>London >>-----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- >>Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? >>Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job >>easier >>Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo >> >> =20 >> >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642___ _ >___________________________________________ > =20 > >>Quickfixj-users mailing list >>Qui...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users >> >> =20 >> > > > > > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------------------------------------------------= - >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job >easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Quickfixj-users mailing list >Qui...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > > >End of Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 >********************************************* > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------= - >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 >_______________________________________________ >Quickfixj-users mailing list >Qui...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > =20 > ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Quickfixj-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users End of Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 2 ********************************************* -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 _______________________________________________ Quickfixj-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users |
|
From: Peter W. <pw...@bl...> - 2006-11-03 11:51:21
|
Hi Matyas, Thank you for that thought. I have tried hard to synchronize the = computer clocks but maybe not successfully. I'll look at the initiator logs and compare times. Does the event log entry 'No responder, not sending = message' Mean anything to anyone? Thanks again to Steve and Matyas for your help. Peter Warder=20 -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of qui...@li... Sent: 02 November 2006 20:30 To: qui...@li... Subject: Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 2 Send Quickfixj-users mailing list submissions to qui...@li... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to qui...@li... You can reach the person managing the list at qui...@li... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Quickfixj-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Session is not current (Peter Warder) 2. Re: Session is not current (Matyas Barakonyi) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:23:03 -0000 From: "Peter Warder" <pw...@bl...> Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: <qui...@li...> Message-ID: <000001c6fe71$46471160$0300a8c0@HAL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" Steve, Thank you for your response. I understand that the log message does not necessarily mean a problem. The problem is that the acceptor is replying = to the Logon message with a Logout (35=3D5) so we can never get a = conversation started. The initiator is an established FIX engine (quickfix C version) already successfully talking with other institutions. So using Banzai wont help. Thanks, Peter Warder London I've posted the event log below: 20061101-15:26:03: Session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST schedule is weekly, SUN 19:00:00 UTC - SAT 18:00:00 UTC 20061101-15:26:03: Session state is not current; resetting FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST 20061101-15:26:03: No responder, not sending message 20061101-15:26:03: Valid order types: [1] 20061101-15:26:03: Created session: FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST 20061101-15:26:42: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4847 20061101-15:26:42: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:26:42: Disconnecting 20061101-15:27:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4848 20061101-15:27:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:27:43: Disconnecting 20061101-15:28:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4849 20061101-15:28:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:28:43: Disconnecting 20061101-15:29:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4850 20061101-15:29:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:29:43: Disconnecting And the message log: 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D17=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:26:43.135=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D207=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:26:42.750=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D051=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D19=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:27:43.438=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D216=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:27:43.000=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D041=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D21=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:28:43.691=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D211=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:28:43.250=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D049=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D23=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:29:43.933=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D213=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:29:43.484=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D059=01 -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of qui...@li... Sent: 01 November 2006 22:31 To: qui...@li... Subject: Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 Send Quickfixj-users mailing list submissions to qui...@li... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to qui...@li... You can reach the person managing the list at qui...@li... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Quickfixj-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Session is not current (Peter Warder) 2. Re: Session is not current (st...@te...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:15:07 -0000 From: "Peter Warder" <pw...@bl...> Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: <qui...@li...> Message-ID: <000001c6fdd0$e717a830$0300a8c0@HAL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" Hi, I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very experienced developer. I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor example) and have made decent progress. I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout message = is returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a message = that the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix it. Any ideas?? (logs attached) Peter Warder London -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.messages.log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 772 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/atta= chmen ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment.obj=20 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.event.log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1105 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/atta= chmen ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment-0001.obj=20 ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:42:09 -0500 (EST) From: st...@te... Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: pe...@ss..., qui...@li... Message-ID: <106...@we...> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=3Diso-8859-1 That log message doesn't necessarily indicate a problem. It's telling = you that you have begun a new session (based on your session start/end schedule) and it's going to reset the message store and sequence = numbers. This may or may not be a problem depending on the context. It appears you are using the example order executor for your test. Have you tried running Banzai as a client to the executor with the configuration changed slightly for your scenario? Steve > QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ > QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ > Hi, > > I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very > experienced developer. > I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor > example) and have made decent progress. > I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an > initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout = message is > returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a = message > that > the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix > it. > Any ideas?? (logs attached) > > Peter Warder > London > = -------------------------------------------------------------------------= > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642____ ___________________________________________ > Quickfixj-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Quickfixj-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users End of Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 ********************************************* ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 12:50:48 +0100 From: Matyas Barakonyi <ma...@ba...> Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: pe...@ss..., qui...@li... Message-ID: <454...@ba...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1; format=3Dflowed Hi! I had a similar problem few mounths ago... The session could not be=20 established. It was a time sinchronization problem between the 2 computers. It was=20 only a 0.5 min, but the accptor can't process the msg of the = initiator... I'm wondering if this couldn't be a problem in your case... Regards, Matyas >QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ >QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ >Steve, > >Thank you for your response. I understand that the log message does not >necessarily mean a problem. The problem is that the acceptor is = replying to >the Logon message with a Logout (35=3D5) so we can never get a = conversation >started. > >The initiator is an established FIX engine (quickfix C version) already >successfully talking with other institutions. So using Banzai wont = help. > >Thanks, >Peter Warder >London > >I've posted the event log below: > >20061101-15:26:03: Session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST schedule is >weekly, SUN 19:00:00 UTC - SAT 18:00:00 UTC >20061101-15:26:03: Session state is not current; resetting >FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST >20061101-15:26:03: No responder, not sending message >20061101-15:26:03: Valid order types: [1] >20061101-15:26:03: Created session: FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST >20061101-15:26:42: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4847 >20061101-15:26:42: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:26:42: Disconnecting >20061101-15:27:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4848 >20061101-15:27:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:27:43: Disconnecting >20061101-15:28:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4849 >20061101-15:28:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:28:43: Disconnecting >20061101-15:29:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from >/62.138.239.155:4850 >20061101-15:29:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:29:43: Disconnecting > >And the message log: >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D17=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:26:43.135=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D207=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:26:42.750=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D051=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D19=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:27:43.438=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D216=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:27:43.000=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D041=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D21=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:28:43.691=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D211=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:28:43.250=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D049=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D23=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:29:43.933=0156=3DSFC T >RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D213=01 >8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D20061= 101-15:29:43.484=0156=3DAPC_T E >ST=0110=3D059=01 > > >-----Original Message----- >From: qui...@li... >[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of >qui...@li... >Sent: 01 November 2006 22:31 >To: qui...@li... >Subject: Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 > >Send Quickfixj-users mailing list submissions to > qui...@li... > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > qui...@li... > >You can reach the person managing the list at > qui...@li... > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Quickfixj-users digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Session is not current (Peter Warder) > 2. Re: Session is not current (st...@te...) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:15:07 -0000 >From: "Peter Warder" <pw...@bl...> >Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current >To: <qui...@li...> >Message-ID: <000001c6fdd0$e717a830$0300a8c0@HAL> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" > >Hi, > >I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very >experienced developer. >I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor >example) and have made decent progress. >I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an >initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout message = is >returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a message that >the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix >it. >Any ideas?? (logs attached) > >Peter Warder >London >-------------- next part -------------- >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.messages.log >Type: application/octet-stream >Size: 772 bytes >Desc: not available >Url : >http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/att= achme n >ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment.obj=20 >-------------- next part -------------- >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.event.log >Type: application/octet-stream >Size: 1105 bytes >Desc: not available >Url : >http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/att= achme n >ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment-0001.obj=20 > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:42:09 -0500 (EST) >From: st...@te... >Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current >To: pe...@ss..., qui...@li... >Message-ID: > <106...@we...> >Content-Type: text/plain;charset=3Diso-8859-1 > >That log message doesn't necessarily indicate a problem. It's telling = you >that you have begun a new session (based on your session start/end >schedule) and it's going to reset the message store and sequence = numbers. >This may or may not be a problem depending on the context. > >It appears you are using the example order executor for your test. Have >you tried running Banzai as a client to the executor with the >configuration changed slightly for your scenario? > >Steve > > =20 > >>QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ >>QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ >>Hi, >> >>I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very >>experienced developer. >>I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor >>example) and have made decent progress. >>I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an >>initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout = message is >>returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a = message >>that >>the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix >>it. >>Any ideas?? (logs attached) >> >>Peter Warder >>London >>-----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- >>Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? >>Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job >>easier >>Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo >> >> =20 >> >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642___ _ >___________________________________________ > =20 > >>Quickfixj-users mailing list >>Qui...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users >> >> =20 >> > > > > > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------------------------------------------------= - >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job >easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Quickfixj-users mailing list >Qui...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > > >End of Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 >********************************************* > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------= - >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 >_______________________________________________ >Quickfixj-users mailing list >Qui...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > =20 > ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Quickfixj-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users End of Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 2 ********************************************* |
|
From: Matyas B. <ma...@ba...> - 2006-11-02 11:51:01
|
Hi! I had a similar problem few mounths ago... The session could not be established. It was a time sinchronization problem between the 2 computers. It was only a 0.5 min, but the accptor can't process the msg of the initiator... I'm wondering if this couldn't be a problem in your case... Regards, Matyas >QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ >QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ >Steve, > >Thank you for your response. I understand that the log message does not >necessarily mean a problem. The problem is that the acceptor is replying to >the Logon message with a Logout (35=5) so we can never get a conversation >started. > >The initiator is an established FIX engine (quickfix C version) already >successfully talking with other institutions. So using Banzai wont help. > >Thanks, >Peter Warder >London > >I've posted the event log below: > >20061101-15:26:03: Session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST schedule is >weekly, SUN 19:00:00 UTC - SAT 18:00:00 UTC >20061101-15:26:03: Session state is not current; resetting >FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST >20061101-15:26:03: No responder, not sending message >20061101-15:26:03: Valid order types: [1] >20061101-15:26:03: Created session: FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST >20061101-15:26:42: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST from >/62.138.239.155:4847 >20061101-15:26:42: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:26:42: Disconnecting >20061101-15:27:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST from >/62.138.239.155:4848 >20061101-15:27:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:27:43: Disconnecting >20061101-15:28:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST from >/62.138.239.155:4849 >20061101-15:28:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:28:43: Disconnecting >20061101-15:29:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST from >/62.138.239.155:4850 >20061101-15:29:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds >20061101-15:29:43: Disconnecting > >And the message log: >8=FIX.4.39=8335=A34=1749=APC_TEST50=FX52=20061101-15:26:43.13556=SFCT >RADE_TEST98=0108=3010=207 >8=FIX.4.39=6435=534=149=SFCTRADE_TEST52=20061101-15:26:42.75056=APC_TE >ST10=051 >8=FIX.4.39=8335=A34=1949=APC_TEST50=FX52=20061101-15:27:43.43856=SFCT >RADE_TEST98=0108=3010=216 >8=FIX.4.39=6435=534=149=SFCTRADE_TEST52=20061101-15:27:43.00056=APC_TE >ST10=041 >8=FIX.4.39=8335=A34=2149=APC_TEST50=FX52=20061101-15:28:43.69156=SFCT >RADE_TEST98=0108=3010=211 >8=FIX.4.39=6435=534=149=SFCTRADE_TEST52=20061101-15:28:43.25056=APC_TE >ST10=049 >8=FIX.4.39=8335=A34=2349=APC_TEST50=FX52=20061101-15:29:43.93356=SFCT >RADE_TEST98=0108=3010=213 >8=FIX.4.39=6435=534=149=SFCTRADE_TEST52=20061101-15:29:43.48456=APC_TE >ST10=059 > > >-----Original Message----- >From: qui...@li... >[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of >qui...@li... >Sent: 01 November 2006 22:31 >To: qui...@li... >Subject: Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 > >Send Quickfixj-users mailing list submissions to > qui...@li... > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > qui...@li... > >You can reach the person managing the list at > qui...@li... > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Quickfixj-users digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Session is not current (Peter Warder) > 2. Re: Session is not current (st...@te...) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:15:07 -0000 >From: "Peter Warder" <pw...@bl...> >Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current >To: <qui...@li...> >Message-ID: <000001c6fdd0$e717a830$0300a8c0@HAL> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >Hi, > >I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very >experienced developer. >I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor >example) and have made decent progress. >I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an >initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout message is >returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a message that >the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to fix >it. >Any ideas?? (logs attached) > >Peter Warder >London >-------------- next part -------------- >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.messages.log >Type: application/octet-stream >Size: 772 bytes >Desc: not available >Url : >http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=quickfixj-users/attachmen >ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment.obj >-------------- next part -------------- >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.event.log >Type: application/octet-stream >Size: 1105 bytes >Desc: not available >Url : >http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=quickfixj-users/attachmen >ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment-0001.obj > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:42:09 -0500 (EST) >From: st...@te... >Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current >To: pe...@ss..., qui...@li... >Message-ID: > <106...@we...> >Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > >That log message doesn't necessarily indicate a problem. It's telling you >that you have begun a new session (based on your session start/end >schedule) and it's going to reset the message store and sequence numbers. >This may or may not be a problem depending on the context. > >It appears you are using the example order executor for your test. Have >you tried running Banzai as a client to the executor with the >configuration changed slightly for your scenario? > >Steve > > > >>QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ >>QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ >>Hi, >> >>I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very >>experienced developer. >>I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor >>example) and have made decent progress. >>I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an >>initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout message is >>returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a message >>that >>the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to fix >>it. >>Any ideas?? (logs attached) >> >>Peter Warder >>London >>------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? >>Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job >>easier >>Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo >> >> >> >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642____ >___________________________________________ > > >>Quickfixj-users mailing list >>Qui...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users >> >> >> > > > > > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job >easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Quickfixj-users mailing list >Qui...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > > >End of Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 >********************************************* > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >_______________________________________________ >Quickfixj-users mailing list >Qui...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > > |
|
From: Peter W. <pw...@bl...> - 2006-11-02 11:23:20
|
Steve, Thank you for your response. I understand that the log message does not necessarily mean a problem. The problem is that the acceptor is replying = to the Logon message with a Logout (35=3D5) so we can never get a = conversation started. The initiator is an established FIX engine (quickfix C version) already successfully talking with other institutions. So using Banzai wont help. Thanks, Peter Warder London I've posted the event log below: 20061101-15:26:03: Session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST schedule is weekly, SUN 19:00:00 UTC - SAT 18:00:00 UTC 20061101-15:26:03: Session state is not current; resetting FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST 20061101-15:26:03: No responder, not sending message 20061101-15:26:03: Valid order types: [1] 20061101-15:26:03: Created session: FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST 20061101-15:26:42: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4847 20061101-15:26:42: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:26:42: Disconnecting 20061101-15:27:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4848 20061101-15:27:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:27:43: Disconnecting 20061101-15:28:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4849 20061101-15:28:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:28:43: Disconnecting 20061101-15:29:43: Accepting session FIX.4.3:SFCTRADE_TEST->APC_TEST = from /62.138.239.155:4850 20061101-15:29:43: Acceptor heartbeat set to 30 seconds 20061101-15:29:43: Disconnecting And the message log: 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D17=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:26:43.135=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D207=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:26:42.750=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D051=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D19=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:27:43.438=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D216=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:27:43.000=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D041=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D21=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:28:43.691=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D211=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:28:43.250=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D049=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D83=0135=3DA=0134=3D23=0149=3DAPC_TEST=0150=3DFX=0152=3D= 20061101-15:29:43.933=0156=3DSFCT RADE_TEST=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D213=01 8=3DFIX.4.3=019=3D64=0135=3D5=0134=3D1=0149=3DSFCTRADE_TEST=0152=3D200611= 01-15:29:43.484=0156=3DAPC_TE ST=0110=3D059=01 -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of qui...@li... Sent: 01 November 2006 22:31 To: qui...@li... Subject: Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 Send Quickfixj-users mailing list submissions to qui...@li... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to qui...@li... You can reach the person managing the list at qui...@li... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Quickfixj-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Session is not current (Peter Warder) 2. Re: Session is not current (st...@te...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:15:07 -0000 From: "Peter Warder" <pw...@bl...> Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: <qui...@li...> Message-ID: <000001c6fdd0$e717a830$0300a8c0@HAL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" Hi, I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very experienced developer. I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor example) and have made decent progress. I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout message = is returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a message = that the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix it. Any ideas?? (logs attached) Peter Warder London -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.messages.log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 772 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/atta= chmen ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment.obj=20 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIX.4.3-SFCTRADE_TEST-APC_TEST.event.log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1105 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dquickfixj-users/atta= chmen ts/20061101/14f2b7d0/attachment-0001.obj=20 ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:42:09 -0500 (EST) From: st...@te... Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Session is not current To: pe...@ss..., qui...@li... Message-ID: <106...@we...> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=3Diso-8859-1 That log message doesn't necessarily indicate a problem. It's telling = you that you have begun a new session (based on your session start/end schedule) and it's going to reset the message store and sequence = numbers. This may or may not be a problem depending on the context. It appears you are using the example order executor for your test. Have you tried running Banzai as a client to the executor with the configuration changed slightly for your scenario? Steve > QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ > QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ > Hi, > > I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very > experienced developer. > I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor > example) and have made decent progress. > I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an > initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout = message is > returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a = message > that > the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix > it. > Any ideas?? (logs attached) > > Peter Warder > London > = -------------------------------------------------------------------------= > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642____ ___________________________________________ > Quickfixj-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Quickfixj-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users End of Quickfixj-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 ********************************************* |
|
From: <st...@te...> - 2006-11-01 16:42:23
|
That log message doesn't necessarily indicate a problem. It's telling you that you have begun a new session (based on your session start/end schedule) and it's going to reset the message store and sequence numbers. This may or may not be a problem depending on the context. It appears you are using the example order executor for your test. Have you tried running Banzai as a client to the executor with the configuration changed slightly for your scenario? Steve > QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ > QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ > Hi, > > I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very > experienced developer. > I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor > example) and have made decent progress. > I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an > initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout message is > returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a message > that > the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to fix > it. > Any ideas?? (logs attached) > > Peter Warder > London > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642_______________________________________________ > Quickfixj-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > |
|
From: Peter W. <pw...@bl...> - 2006-11-01 16:15:29
|
Hi, I'm a Java rookie and a quickfixj rookie but in other respects a very experienced developer. I'm trying to get a quickfixj acceptor running (based on the executor example) and have made decent progress. I am receiving what look like perfectly good Logon messages from an initiator but their authentication fails on my side so a Logout message = is returned to the initiator. The failure seems to be to do with a message = that the 'session is not current'. I don't know what this means nor how to = fix it. Any ideas?? (logs attached) Peter Warder London |
|
From: Oren M. <or...@qu...> - 2006-10-31 16:51:58
|
That line is an artifact of how QuickFIX used to resend requests. =20
You are correct that it will in all cases be overwritten, but it is =20
intentional that resend requests are done the new way. It has been =20
recommended for some time that all resend requests be done to =20
infinity instead of asking for specific ranges. The relevant section =20=
of the specification is this:
Ordered Message Processing:
The FIX protocol assumes complete ordered delivery of messages =20
between parties. Implementers should
consider this when designing message gap fill processes. Two options =20=
exist for dealing with gaps, either request
all messages subsequent to the last message received or ask for the =20
specific message missed while maintaining
an ordered list of all newer messages. For example, if the receiver =20
misses the second of five messages, the
application could ignore messages 3 through 5 and generate a resend =20
request for messages 2 through 5, or,
preferably 2 through 0 (where 0 represents infinity). Another option =20=
would involve saving messages 3 through 5
and resending only message 2. In both cases, messages 3 through 5 =20
should not be processed before message 2.
The spec doesn't explain why this is, but asking for specific ranges =20
can lead into some unfortunate resend-request loops. Either way you =20
will not miss messages. The protocol is designed to handle infinite =20
resend requests in this fashion. The sequence numbers are always =20
used to verify the next messages that needs to be passed to your =20
application. The PossDup is just what is says, a possible =20
duplicate. QuickFIX will always verify if the message is an actual =20
duplicate and pass it on to you if it has not seen the message before =20=
regardless of the contents of that field.
--oren
On Oct 31, 2006, at 9:51 AM, Nick Fortescue wrote:
> I=92m taking this up with the counterparty, but there is a quickfix =20=
> related issue here to I think, related to quickfix=92s resend =20
> request. The code in Session.java has:
>
> private void generateResendRequest(String beginString, int =20
> msgSeqNum) {
>
> Message resendRequest =3D messageFactory.create(beginString, =20=
> MsgType.RESEND_REQUEST);
>
> int beginSeqNo =3D getExpectedTargetNum();
>
> int endSeqNo =3D msgSeqNum - 1; // Why initialized when it =20
> will be
>
> // overwritten
>
> if (beginString.compareTo("FIX.4.2") >=3D 0) {
>
> endSeqNo =3D 0;
>
> } else if (beginString.compareTo("FIX.4.1") <=3D 0) {
>
> endSeqNo =3D 999999;
>
> }
>
> resendRequest.setInt(BeginSeqNo.FIELD, beginSeqNo);
>
> resendRequest.setInt(EndSeqNo.FIELD, endSeqNo);
>
> initializeHeader(resendRequest.getHeader());
>
> sendRaw(resendRequest, 0);
>
> getLog().onEvent("Sent ResendRequest FROM: " + beginSeqNo + =20=
> " TO: " + endSeqNo);
>
> state.setResendRange(beginSeqNo, msgSeqNum - 1);
>
> }
>
>
>
> I don=92t understand why it has these lines:
>
>
>
> if (beginString.compareTo("FIX.4.2") >=3D 0) {
>
> endSeqNo =3D 0;
>
> } else if (beginString.compareTo("FIX.4.1") <=3D 0) {
>
> endSeqNo =3D 999999;
>
> }
>
>
>
> The line before, setting it to msgSeqNum-1 seems much more correct, =20=
> and more consistent with the state.setResendRange(beginSeqNo, =20
> msgSeqNum - 1) code as well. Hopefully if the counterparty =20
> responded with a GapFill for just these, then any messages coming =20
> afterwards would not be lost.
>
>
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Oren Miller [mailto:or...@qu...]
> Sent: 30 October 2006 15:40
> To: qui...@li...
> Cc: ni...@ox...
> Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Logon and resend after connection lost
>
>
>
> Indeed. For whatever reason they chose to gap fill this message. =20
> This is most commonly done with administrative messages (heartbeats =20=
> etc), but is occasionally done for application messages as well =20
> (Orders that are too old to go into market). This is analysis is =20
> correct. For some reason they put TradingSessionStatus in this =20
> category, which may or may not be intentional or an oversight.
>
>
>
> FYI, here is the relevant section in the specifications:
>
>
>
> "The sending application will initiate the Sequence Reset. The =20
> message in all situations specifies NewSeqNo
>
> to reset to as the value of the next sequence number to be expected =20=
> by the message receipient immediately
>
> following the messages and/or sequence numbers being skipped."
>
>
>
> On Oct 30, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Alex McGlashan wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I'm getting a similar problem. What's happening is that the Sequence
>
> Reset from your counterparty (message 289) causes your QFJ to reset =20=
> its
>
> expected incoming sequence number to 295, thereby skipping over =20
> message
>
> 294. You need, somehow, to get your counterparty to adjust the =20
> Sequence
>
> Reset to 294 and the Trading Session Status message should then be
>
> processed. Unfortunately I have not managed to get my counterparty to
>
> do this so please let me know if you have any success!
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------=20=
> ---
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, =20
> security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your =20
> job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache =20
> Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?=20
> cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D121642________________________=
______=20
> _________________
> Quickfixj-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
|
|
From: Nick F. <Nic...@ve...> - 2006-10-31 15:51:48
|
I'm taking this up with the counterparty, but there is a quickfix
related issue here to I think, related to quickfix's resend request. The
code in Session.java has:
=20
private void generateResendRequest(String beginString, int
msgSeqNum) {
Message resendRequest =3D messageFactory.create(beginString,
MsgType.RESEND_REQUEST);
int beginSeqNo =3D getExpectedTargetNum();
int endSeqNo =3D msgSeqNum - 1; // Why initialized when it will =
be
// overwritten
if (beginString.compareTo("FIX.4.2") >=3D 0) {
endSeqNo =3D 0;
} else if (beginString.compareTo("FIX.4.1") <=3D 0) {
endSeqNo =3D 999999;
}
resendRequest.setInt(BeginSeqNo.FIELD, beginSeqNo);
resendRequest.setInt(EndSeqNo.FIELD, endSeqNo);
initializeHeader(resendRequest.getHeader());
sendRaw(resendRequest, 0);
getLog().onEvent("Sent ResendRequest FROM: " + beginSeqNo + "
TO: " + endSeqNo);
state.setResendRange(beginSeqNo, msgSeqNum - 1);
}
=20
I don't understand why it has these lines:
=20
if (beginString.compareTo("FIX.4.2") >=3D 0) {
endSeqNo =3D 0;
} else if (beginString.compareTo("FIX.4.1") <=3D 0) {
endSeqNo =3D 999999;
}
=20
The line before, setting it to msgSeqNum-1 seems much more correct, and
more consistent with the state.setResendRange(beginSeqNo, msgSeqNum - 1)
code as well. Hopefully if the counterparty responded with a GapFill for
just these, then any messages coming afterwards would not be lost.
=20
Nick=20
=20
=20
________________________________
From: Oren Miller [mailto:or...@qu...]=20
Sent: 30 October 2006 15:40
To: qui...@li...
Cc: ni...@ox...
Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Logon and resend after connection lost
=20
Indeed. For whatever reason they chose to gap fill this message. This
is most commonly done with administrative messages (heartbeats etc), but
is occasionally done for application messages as well (Orders that are
too old to go into market). This is analysis is correct. For some
reason they put TradingSessionStatus in this category, which may or may
not be intentional or an oversight. =20
=20
FYI, here is the relevant section in the specifications:
=20
"The sending application will initiate the Sequence Reset. The message
in all situations specifies NewSeqNo=20
to reset to as the value of the next sequence number to be expected by
the message receipient immediately=20
following the messages and/or sequence numbers being skipped."
=20
On Oct 30, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Alex McGlashan wrote:
I'm getting a similar problem. What's happening is that the Sequence
Reset from your counterparty (message 289) causes your QFJ to reset its
expected incoming sequence number to 295, thereby skipping over message
294. You need, somehow, to get your counterparty to adjust the Sequence
Reset to 294 and the Trading Session Status message should then be
processed. Unfortunately I have not managed to get my counterparty to
do this so please let me know if you have any success!
=20
|
|
From: Nick F. <ni...@ox...> - 2006-10-31 09:24:33
|
Thanks to all. I'll chase it up with the counterparty. Nick _____ From: Oren Miller [mailto:or...@qu...] Sent: 30 October 2006 15:40 To: qui...@li... Cc: ni...@ox... Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Logon and resend after connection lost Indeed. For whatever reason they chose to gap fill this message. This is most commonly done with administrative messages (heartbeats etc), but is occasionally done for application messages as well (Orders that are too old to go into market). This is analysis is correct. For some reason they put TradingSessionStatus in this category, which may or may not be intentional or an oversight. FYI, here is the relevant section in the specifications: "The sending application will initiate the Sequence Reset. The message in all situations specifies NewSeqNo to reset to as the value of the next sequence number to be expected by the message receipient immediately following the messages and/or sequence numbers being skipped." On Oct 30, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Alex McGlashan wrote: I'm getting a similar problem. What's happening is that the Sequence Reset from your counterparty (message 289) causes your QFJ to reset its expected incoming sequence number to 295, thereby skipping over message 294. You need, somehow, to get your counterparty to adjust the Sequence Reset to 294 and the Trading Session Status message should then be processed. Unfortunately I have not managed to get my counterparty to do this so please let me know if you have any success! |
|
From: Oren M. <or...@qu...> - 2006-10-30 16:39:14
|
Indeed. For whatever reason they chose to gap fill this message. This is most commonly done with administrative messages (heartbeats etc), but is occasionally done for application messages as well (Orders that are too old to go into market). This is analysis is correct. For some reason they put TradingSessionStatus in this category, which may or may not be intentional or an oversight. FYI, here is the relevant section in the specifications: "The sending application will initiate the Sequence Reset. The message in all situations specifies NewSeqNo to reset to as the value of the next sequence number to be expected by the message receipient immediately following the messages and/or sequence numbers being skipped." On Oct 30, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Alex McGlashan wrote: > I'm getting a similar problem. What's happening is that the Sequence > Reset from your counterparty (message 289) causes your QFJ to reset > its > expected incoming sequence number to 295, thereby skipping over > message > 294. You need, somehow, to get your counterparty to adjust the > Sequence > Reset to 294 and the Trading Session Status message should then be > processed. Unfortunately I have not managed to get my counterparty to > do this so please let me know if you have any success! |
|
From: Alex M. <ale...@eu...> - 2006-10-30 15:21:23
|
Hi Nick, I'm getting a similar problem. What's happening is that the Sequence Reset from your counterparty (message 289) causes your QFJ to reset its expected incoming sequence number to 295, thereby skipping over message 294. You need, somehow, to get your counterparty to adjust the Sequence Reset to 294 and the Trading Session Status message should then be processed. Unfortunately I have not managed to get my counterparty to do this so please let me know if you have any success! Regards, Alex -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Nick Fortescue Sent: 30 October 2006 14:09 To: qui...@li... Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Logon and resend after connection lost QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ Eurobase International Limited and its subsidiaries (Eurobase) are = unable to exercise control over the content of information in E-Mails. = Any views and opinions expressed may be personal to the sender and are = not necessarily those of Eurobase. Eurobase will not enter into any = contractual obligations in respect of any part of its business in any = E-mail.=20 Privileged / confidential information may be contained in this message = and /or any attachments. This E-mail is intended for the use of the = addressee(s) only and may contain confidential information. If you are = not the / an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or = dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you = receive this transmission in error, please notify us immediately, and = then delete this E-mail.=20 Neither the sender nor Eurobase accepts any liability whatsoever for any = defects of any kind either in or arising from this E-mail transmission. = E-Mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free, as = messages can be intercepted, lost, corrupted, destroyed, contain = viruses, or arrive late or incomplete. Eurobase does not accept any = responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan any = attachments. Registered Address: Essex House, 2 County Place, Chelmsford, Essex CM2 = 0RE, United Kingdom |
|
From: Nick F. <ni...@ox...> - 2006-10-30 14:09:21
|
I'm testing quickfix/j using lost connections and there seems to be a message that never reaches my Application. I wonder if this is a quickfix problem. I've censored the id's below to "ME" and "BROKER", these aren't the originals. The sequence: 8=FIX.4.29=9435=A34=16949=ME52=20061030-12:41:55.71756=BROKER98=0108=3010=01 0 8=FIX.4.29=9035=A49=BROKER56=ME34=29252=20061030-12:42:03108=3098=010=048 8=FIX.4.29=9135=249=BROKER56=ME34=29352=20061030-12:42:037=16616=16810=096 8=FIX.4.29=9335=234=17049=ME52=20061030-12:42:04.70256=BROKER7=28916=010=187 8=FIX.4.29=9035=h49=BROKER56=ME34=29452=20061030-12:42:03336=0340=210=081 8=FIX.4.29=22135=D34=16643=Y49=ME52=20061030-12:42:04.71756=BROKER122=200610 30-12:40:4511=20061030-124045-279-4:115=GBP21=138=600000040=F44=1.554=255=GB P/USD59=060=20061030-12:40:45167=FOR10=235 8=FIX.4.29=12235=434=16743=Y49=ME52=20061030-12:42:04.71756=BROKER122=200610 30-12:42:0436=169123=Y10=164 8=FIX.4.29=9635=449=BROKER56=ME34=28952=20061030-12:42:0443=Y123=Y36=29510=1 37 8=FIX.4.29=13335=j49=BROKER56=ME34=29552=20061030-12:42:0445=166372=D380=058 =Do not support duplicate message10=201 Messages 169,292: I logon after a lost connection and I get a logon response, neither of us resets. Message 293: The broker requests a resend of messages 166-168 Message 170: I request a resend of all messages after 289 Message 294: I receive a TradingSessionStatus message telling me the session is open. THIS MESSAGE NEVER REACHES MY APPLICATION Message 166: I send message 166 (an order) to the broker. I'm not sure if this is resend, or a left over message from before the connection dropped. Message 167: I send a sequence reset to the broker asking to reset to 169, with Gap Fill set. This I assume is to replace the requested resend Message 289: The broker sends a sequence reset to me asking to reset to 295, with Gap Fill set, again to avoid a resend. Message 295: The broker rejects the resent order. I hate asking someone else to do my debugging, but I was hoping using quickfixj would avoid me getting too deep in understanding the whole reconnection protocol. Does anyone know why message 294, the trading session status message never reaches my application through the fromApp() method? Nick |
|
From: Alvin W. <AW...@FF...> - 2006-10-26 21:45:50
|
First of all, there is some additional info (as you may have known) http://www.fixprotocol.org/committees/gtc/documents http://www.fixprotocol.org/documents/2943/FIX%205.0%20FAQs.doc I am not sure if they will publish the repository files. As long as the message can be delivered once, can be guaranteed delivery, and in the right order, it can be on any non-FIX session for example MQ. Another thing they talked is like a firm can use FIX 5 session to send an order in FIX 4.2 and then allocate using FIX 4.4 for example. (I think QF needs to think a way to make the application easily forward compatible, for example how to reuse the existing application code using quickfix.fix44 package work with FIX 5? and how to reuse the application code to work on both FIX 44 and FIX 5 rather than rewriting the code using "quickfix.fix5" package?) Then there are concept of extension package and service pack. Then some new support on the business side, like FX, advancement in order routing, and regulatory initiatives...... Oren Miller <oren@quickfixeng ine.org> To Alvin Wang <AW...@FF...> 10/28/2006 04:28 cc PM Eranga <pe...@ri...>, qui...@li... ge.net, quickfix-developers-bounces@lists.s ourceforge.net, qui...@li... t, <qui...@li.... net> Subject Re: [Quickfix-developers] Quickfix for FIX 5.0..... Do you know if they plan on freely distributing the repository or is it still only going to be available to members only. That's has been a key problem with directly supporting the repository in the past, we simply are not allowed to redistribute it as is. If not we will likely end up generating the QF data dictionary from the repository. We have code that can do this assuming their format hasn't changed significantly. We do have plans to support FAST. FIX 5.0 and FAST support are both significant projects and we will need to prioritize to figure out which we want to tackle first. Any other information you have would be very useful. Did they go over any scenarios regarding the transport independence? I was wondering how it will effect resend requests. --oren On Oct 26, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Alvin Wang wrote: > We went to FPL's Technology Focus Day 2006 today: > http://www.fixprotocol.org/documents/2893/FPL_Technology_Focus_Day.pdf > > Besides transport independence framework and running different FIX > versions > on the same session, FIX 5 will use XML to organize repository (some > similar to quickfix's xml dictionaries). Just wonder if QuickFIX and > QuickFIX/J can leverage that directly. Another big thing is FAST > protocol. > Do QuickFIX and QuickFIX/J plan to support FAST? > > Thanks. ******************************************************************************* This e-mail message is intended solely for the use of the addressee. The message may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disseminate, distribute or copy this communication, by e-mail or otherwise. Instead, please notify us immediately by return e-mail(including the original message with your reply) and then delete and discard all copies of the message. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses but nevertheless advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We accept no liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. ******************************************************************************* |
|
From: Alvin W. <AW...@FF...> - 2006-10-26 20:13:14
|
We went to FPL's Technology Focus Day 2006 today: http://www.fixprotocol.org/documents/2893/FPL_Technology_Focus_Day.pdf Besides transport independence framework and running different FIX versions on the same session, FIX 5 will use XML to organize repository (some similar to quickfix's xml dictionaries). Just wonder if QuickFIX and QuickFIX/J can leverage that directly. Another big thing is FAST protocol. Do QuickFIX and QuickFIX/J plan to support FAST? Thanks. = =20 Oren Miller = =20 <oren@quickfixeng = =20 ine.org> To= =20 Sent by: Eranga = =20 quickfix-develope <pe...@ri...> = =20 rs-bounces@lists. cc= =20 sourceforge.net qui...@li...= =20 ge.net, = =20 qui...@li...= =20 10/25/2006 02:56 t = =20 AM Subject= =20 Re: [Quickfix-developers] Quickfix = =20 for FIX 5.0..... = =20 = =20 = =20 = =20 = =20 = =20 = =20 QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html Well the first cut will be likely to use the Session Protocol as the first supported transport for application messages.=A0 This can be implemented wi= th relatively little change to the architecture as it is pretty similar to how the previous versions work already.=A0 This will require supporting the new versioning constructs while maintaining backwards compatibility with the old ones.=A0 There will probably have to be some changes to how data dictionaries work, since I guess we will need two of them. The first release of QF with 5.0 support will probably only implement transporting application messages over the session protocol.=A0=A0After tha= t I suppose it will come down to the first viable use case of sending application messages over a different transport. --oren On Oct 25, 2006, at 12:50 AM, Eranga Samararathna wrote: QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html Hi, How is the quickfix / quickfixj preparation for FIX 5.0? Is quickfix need architecture change to address the new loosely coupled FIX application layer and FIX session layer? BR, Eranga ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D1= 21642 _______________________________________________ Quickfix-developers mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers ***********= ******************************************************************** This e-mail message is intended solely for the use of the addressee. The message may contain information that is privileged and=20 confidential. Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disseminate, distribute or copy this communication, by e-mail or otherwise. Instead, please notify us immediately by return e-mail(including the original message with your reply) and then delete and discard all copies of the message. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses but nevertheless advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We accept no liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. ***************************************************************************= **** |
|
From: Oren M. <or...@qu...> - 2006-10-25 15:23:10
|
Alvin, The messages table needs to be able to be reset. When a new session is created, all the messages must be destroyed as they are not longer relevant to the session. Further more a session can be reset during the day or altered in other ways. This is not a trait that is desirable in logging, which must persist indefinitely until you would specifically like to purge it. The log is a record of everything that happened regardless of the state of the engine. Furthermore, it is often desirable to use one storage medium for managing state, and a separate one for logging. --oren On Oct 25, 2006, at 9:58 AM, Alvin Wang wrote: > QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ > QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ > Toby, thanks. > > I feel if there is an inbound/outbound tag in messages_log table, > those 2 > tables can be merged. Now it seems half of the data are duplicated. > Do I > miss anything? > > thanks.. |
|
From: Alvin W. <AW...@FF...> - 2006-10-25 14:58:15
|
Toby, thanks.
I feel if there is an inbound/outbound tag in messages_log table, those 2
tables can be merged. Now it seems half of the data are duplicated. Do I
miss anything?
thanks..
"Shepheard, Toby
(London)"
<Toby_Shepheard@m To
l.com> <qui...@li....
Sent by: net>
quickfixj-users-b cc
ou...@li...
ceforge.net Subject
Re: [Quickfixj-users] messages and
messages_log table
10/25/2006 10:54
AM
Please respond to
quickfixj-users@l
ists.sourceforge.
net
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
The messages table is used by the message store, and it stores all
messages which are sent by you, in such a way that they can be resent if
required. It only stores outbound messags, because there's never any
need to replay inbound messages.
The messages_log table is one way in which you can log all inbound and
outbound messages for diagnosing problems or simply checking that
everything is as expected. You could equally use a different logging
adapter and log to a file or logging service. These logs are not
replayable and are only for informational purposes.
Not sure how you tell if messages are inbound or outbound as don't use
the DB for logging. In my log4j text files it's readily apparent by
logging the class along with the message "quickfixj.msg.outgoing" vs
"quickfixj.msg.incoming" but I can see you may well not get this in the
DB logging. You can always tell by checking the Source and Target
CompIDs in the quickfix message itself, though that's not very
convenient. Hopefully there's a better way.
-----Original Message-----
From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
Alvin Wang
Sent: 25 October 2006 15:30
To: qui...@li...; st...@te...
Subject: [Quickfixj-users] messages and messages_log table
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
Hi,
where is the difference between messages and messages_log table? It
seems
messages table only record the outgoing msgs. Why do we need 2 tables?
Also in messages_log table, how to easily tell if a message is outgoing
or
incoming message?
Thanks,
Alvin
************************************************************************
*******
This e-mail message is intended solely for the use of the addressee.
The message may contain information that is privileged and
confidential.
Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disseminate,
distribute or copy this communication, by e-mail or otherwise. Instead,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail(including the original
message with your reply) and then delete and discard all copies of the
message. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting
software viruses but nevertheless advise you to carry out your own
virus checks on any attachment to this message. We accept
no liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses.
************************************************************************
*******
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
Qui...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
--------------------------------------------------------
If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the
sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain
or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to
this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
--------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
Qui...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
|
|
From: Shepheard, T. \(London\) <Tob...@ml...> - 2006-10-25 14:54:40
|
The messages table is used by the message store, and it stores all messages which are sent by you, in such a way that they can be resent if required. It only stores outbound messags, because there's never any need to replay inbound messages. The messages_log table is one way in which you can log all inbound and outbound messages for diagnosing problems or simply checking that everything is as expected. You could equally use a different logging adapter and log to a file or logging service. These logs are not replayable and are only for informational purposes.=20 Not sure how you tell if messages are inbound or outbound as don't use the DB for logging. In my log4j text files it's readily apparent by logging the class along with the message "quickfixj.msg.outgoing" vs "quickfixj.msg.incoming" but I can see you may well not get this in the DB logging. You can always tell by checking the Source and Target CompIDs in the quickfix message itself, though that's not very convenient. Hopefully there's a better way. -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Alvin Wang Sent: 25 October 2006 15:30 To: qui...@li...; st...@te... Subject: [Quickfixj-users] messages and messages_log table QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ Hi, where is the difference between messages and messages_log table? It seems messages table only record the outgoing msgs. Why do we need 2 tables? Also in messages_log table, how to easily tell if a message is outgoing or incoming message? Thanks, Alvin =20 ************************************************************************ ******* This e-mail message is intended solely for the use of the addressee. The message may contain information that is privileged and=20 confidential. Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disseminate, distribute or copy this communication, by e-mail or otherwise. Instead, please notify us immediately by return e-mail(including the original message with your reply) and then delete and discard all copies of the message. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses but nevertheless advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We accept no liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. ************************************************************************ ******* ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 _______________________________________________ Quickfixj-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users -------------------------------------------------------- If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the = sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, = retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms = relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ -------------------------------------------------------- |
|
From: Alvin W. <AW...@FF...> - 2006-10-25 14:29:55
|
Hi,
where is the difference between messages and messages_log table? It seems
messages table only record the outgoing msgs. Why do we need 2 tables?
Also in messages_log table, how to easily tell if a message is outgoing or
incoming message?
Thanks,
Alvin
*******************************************************************************
This e-mail message is intended solely for the use of the addressee.
The message may contain information that is privileged and
confidential.
Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disseminate,
distribute or copy this communication, by e-mail or otherwise. Instead,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail(including the original
message with your reply) and then delete and discard all copies of the
message. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting
software viruses but nevertheless advise you to carry out your own
virus checks on any attachment to this message. We accept
no liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses.
*******************************************************************************
|
|
From: Matyas B. <ma...@ba...> - 2006-10-24 14:04:00
|
Hi Steve! Thank you very much! It seems I didn't read enough carefully the FIX doc. :) Regards, Matyas Steve Bate wrote: > Hi Matyas, > > According to the FIX 4.4 specification (in the data type > descriptions)... > > "Data fields are always immediately preceded by a length field. The > length field should specify the number of bytes of the value of the data > field (up to but not including the terminating SOH)." > > It must be there because the data field could have 0x01 bytes (SOH) in > it so the normal parsing can't be used. > > Regards, > > Steve > > > -----Original Message----- > From: qui...@li... > [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of > Matyas Barakonyi > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 5:32 AM > To: Oren Miller > Cc: qui...@li... > Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] SEVERE: Invalid message: Actual body > length=53, Expected body length=70 > > > QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ > QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ > Hi! > > Thanks! We tried it with the RawDataLength (Tag #96) field, and it > works! But I don't see in the FIX 4.4 Documentation, that the > RawDataLenght is required for the RawData (Tag #96). We checked the > DataDictionary file, and FieldMap.java (in the source), but we didn't > find the reason of this problem. Our problem really is that we have to > modify our User Specifications because of this, and we have to update it > > for all of our users... It could be easier to just leave the > RawDataLength field for us... If it is not possible, we will use it of > course, but if somebody has any ideas, please let us know about it! > > Thanks, > Matyas > > Oren Miller wrote: > >> At a length of 53 is exactly where field 96 begins. I wonder if >> QuickFIX/J is confused that you have a RawData field (96) that isn't >> preceded by a RawDataLength field (95). Any reason for this? >> >> --oren >> >> On Oct 19, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Matyas Barakonyi wrote: >> >> >>> We have a very strange problem here! We have an acceptor and an >>> initiator. They use a same Quickfix binary (1.0.4). BUT, every time, >>> when the initiator try to log in, we get the following error: >>> SEVERE: Invalid message: Actual body length=53, Expected body >>> length=70 >>> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > - > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, > security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make > your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based > on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Quickfixj-users mailing list Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users > > |
|
From: Steve B. <st...@te...> - 2006-10-24 12:20:57
|
Hi Matyas, According to the FIX 4.4 specification (in the data type descriptions)... "Data fields are always immediately preceded by a length field. The length field should specify the number of bytes of the value of the data field (up to but not including the terminating SOH)." It must be there because the data field could have 0x01 bytes (SOH) in it so the normal parsing can't be used. Regards, Steve -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Matyas Barakonyi Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 5:32 AM To: Oren Miller Cc: qui...@li... Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] SEVERE: Invalid message: Actual body length=53, Expected body length=70 QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ Hi! Thanks! We tried it with the RawDataLength (Tag #96) field, and it works! But I don't see in the FIX 4.4 Documentation, that the RawDataLenght is required for the RawData (Tag #96). We checked the DataDictionary file, and FieldMap.java (in the source), but we didn't find the reason of this problem. Our problem really is that we have to modify our User Specifications because of this, and we have to update it for all of our users... It could be easier to just leave the RawDataLength field for us... If it is not possible, we will use it of course, but if somebody has any ideas, please let us know about it! Thanks, Matyas Oren Miller wrote: > At a length of 53 is exactly where field 96 begins. I wonder if > QuickFIX/J is confused that you have a RawData field (96) that isn't > preceded by a RawDataLength field (95). Any reason for this? > > --oren > > On Oct 19, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Matyas Barakonyi wrote: > >> We have a very strange problem here! We have an acceptor and an >> initiator. They use a same Quickfix binary (1.0.4). BUT, every time, >> when the initiator try to log in, we get the following error: >> SEVERE: Invalid message: Actual body length=53, Expected body >> length=70 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Quickfixj-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users |
|
From: Matyas B. <ma...@ba...> - 2006-10-24 09:32:29
|
Hi! Thanks! We tried it with the RawDataLength (Tag #96) field, and it works! But I don't see in the FIX 4.4 Documentation, that the RawDataLenght is required for the RawData (Tag #96). We checked the DataDictionary file, and FieldMap.java (in the source), but we didn't find the reason of this problem. Our problem really is that we have to modify our User Specifications because of this, and we have to update it for all of our users... It could be easier to just leave the RawDataLength field for us... If it is not possible, we will use it of course, but if somebody has any ideas, please let us know about it! Thanks, Matyas Oren Miller wrote: > At a length of 53 is exactly where field 96 begins. I wonder if > QuickFIX/J is confused that you have a RawData field (96) that isn't > preceded by a RawDataLength field (95). Any reason for this? > > --oren > > On Oct 19, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Matyas Barakonyi wrote: > >> We have a very strange problem here! We have an acceptor and an >> initiator. They use a same Quickfix binary (1.0.4). BUT, every time, >> when the initiator try to log in, we get the following error: >> SEVERE: Invalid message: Actual body length=53, Expected body length=70 > |
|
From: Toli K. <to...@ma...> - 2006-10-23 20:13:34
|
Alvin, > Steve, where can I find the javadoc? I know quickfix/j has added some new > classes. the javadoc is here: http://www.quickfixj.com/quickfixj/javadoc/ > BTW, Is there a way that I can specify my own database name rather than the > default db name quickfix if I use JDBC? For JDBC, you can specify the DB name for the JdbcLog using these params: JbcDriver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver JdbcURL=jdbc:mysql://localhost/marketcetera_rails JdbcUser=marketcetera JdbcPassword=marketcetera (see http://trac.marketcetera.org/trac.fcgi/browser/platform/trunk/oms/src/main/resources/oms.properties#L54 for example) The table name (messages_log and event_log) are hardcoded for now though. hope this helps. toli |
|
From: Alvin W. <AW...@FF...> - 2006-10-23 19:58:51
|
Sorry.. I saw it in wiki
Alvin Wang/FFTW
10/23/2006 03:46 To
PM qui...@li....n
et, st...@te...
cc
Subject
javadoc(Document link: Alvin Wang)
Steve, where can I find the javadoc? I know quickfix/j has added some new
classes.
thanks
Alvin Wang/FFTW
10/23/2006 03:35 To
PM qui...@li....n
et, st...@te...
cc
Subject
database name(Document link: Alvin
Wang)
Steve, thank you!
BTW, Is there a way that I can specify my own database name rather than the
default db name quickfix if I use JDBC?
thanks.
Steve
<steve@technoetic
.com> To
Sent by: qui...@li....n
quickfixj-users-b et
ou...@li... cc
ceforge.net
Subject
Re: [Quickfixj-users] File Lock on
10/23/2006 11:52 FileStore impossible to free
AM
Please respond to
quickfixj-users@l
ists.sourceforge.
net
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
Alvin Wang wrote:
> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
> Hi Steve,
>
> I got the following exceptions when I tried to run my application on
> QuickFIXJ. Below is my configuration file. Do you have any idea what went
> wrong? I have made sure the connection is ok by running telnet.
>
>
Usually this error occurs if the store file is corrupt or if you try to
use a store file created by QF. In the latter case, just delete the
store file and QFJ will create a new one automatically. Obviously you
should do this outside a scheduled session time. :-)
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
Qui...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
*******************************************************************************
This e-mail message is intended solely for the use of the addressee.
The message may contain information that is privileged and
confidential.
Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disseminate,
distribute or copy this communication, by e-mail or otherwise. Instead,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail(including the original
message with your reply) and then delete and discard all copies of the
message. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting
software viruses but nevertheless advise you to carry out your own
virus checks on any attachment to this message. We accept
no liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses.
*******************************************************************************
|
|
From: Alvin W. <AW...@FF...> - 2006-10-23 19:47:10
|
Steve, where can I find the javadoc? I know quickfix/j has added some new
classes.
thanks
Alvin Wang/FFTW
10/23/2006 03:35 To
PM qui...@li....n
et, st...@te...
cc
Subject
database name(Document link: Alvin
Wang)
Steve, thank you!
BTW, Is there a way that I can specify my own database name rather than the
default db name quickfix if I use JDBC?
thanks.
Steve
<steve@technoetic
.com> To
Sent by: qui...@li....n
quickfixj-users-b et
ou...@li... cc
ceforge.net
Subject
Re: [Quickfixj-users] File Lock on
10/23/2006 11:52 FileStore impossible to free
AM
Please respond to
quickfixj-users@l
ists.sourceforge.
net
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
Alvin Wang wrote:
> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
> Hi Steve,
>
> I got the following exceptions when I tried to run my application on
> QuickFIXJ. Below is my configuration file. Do you have any idea what went
> wrong? I have made sure the connection is ok by running telnet.
>
>
Usually this error occurs if the store file is corrupt or if you try to
use a store file created by QF. In the latter case, just delete the
store file and QFJ will create a new one automatically. Obviously you
should do this outside a scheduled session time. :-)
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
Qui...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
*******************************************************************************
This e-mail message is intended solely for the use of the addressee.
The message may contain information that is privileged and
confidential.
Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disseminate,
distribute or copy this communication, by e-mail or otherwise. Instead,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail(including the original
message with your reply) and then delete and discard all copies of the
message. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting
software viruses but nevertheless advise you to carry out your own
virus checks on any attachment to this message. We accept
no liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses.
*******************************************************************************
|
103 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
