quickfixj-users — General mailing list for QuickFIX/J topics.

Re: [Quickfixj-users] Messages resend request problem

[Christoph J. <chr...@ma...>]

I’m even more confused now. 😊
Could you please post your session config and the messages in question with the seqnums 6988 till 7000 from that day and the log output where the wrong messages are resent.
You have a file store you say. Are you accessing it concurrently, i.e. do you have several (standby) processes? Are you resetting your seqnums manually?

Thanks
Chris

--
Christoph John
Software Engineering

D +49 241 557080 28
chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>

[cid:image001.png@01DB6DBB.C1D3B270]

MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
52066 Aachen, Germany
www.macd.com<http://www.macd.com/>

[cid:image002.png@01DB6DBB.C1D3B270]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/macd/>  [cid:image003.png@01DB6DBB.C1D3B270] <https://www.xing.com/pages/macd>

Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663
Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald

From: Jalal Kharsa <jk...@gr...>
Sent: 23 January 2025 17:12
To: Christoph John <chr...@ma...>; qui...@li...
Subject: RE: Messages resend request problem

Hi,

The sequence numbers are being reset daily, and the sequence numbers requested for the resend have repeatedly appeared over the past two months, as approximately 15,000 to 20,000 messages are exchanged daily. However, instead of retrieving messages with the requested sequence numbers from the most recent date, QuickFIX/J retrieves messages from two months ago.

I hope this provides further clarification.

Regards,
From: Christoph John <chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>>
Sent: 23 January 2025 15:59
To: Jalal Kharsa <jk...@gr...<mailto:jk...@gr...>>; qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>
Subject: RE: Messages resend request problem

You don't often get email from chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
[WARNING] External Email

Hi,

ok, but what is the issue? The messages that have been asked for were delivered. QFJ or FIX protocol respectively do not care about the date but only about the seqnum. Do you never reset your seqnums?
Or do you mean there were other messages resent that were not in the store? How should QFJ get messages from the store that are two months old? Shouldn’t the seqnum advance more than 22 seqnums in two months?
I don’t get the whole picture it seems. Maybe you can elaborate?

Thanks in advance and best regards
Chris


--
Christoph John
Software Engineering

D +49 241 557080 28
chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>

[cid:image001.png@01DB6DBB.C1D3B270]

MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
52066 Aachen, Germany
www.macd.com<http://www.macd.com/>

[cid:image002.png@01DB6DBB.C1D3B270]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/macd/>  [cid:image003.png@01DB6DBB.C1D3B270] <https://www.xing.com/pages/macd>

Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663
Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald

From: Jalal Kharsa <jk...@gr...<mailto:jk...@gr...>>
Sent: 23 January 2025 09:13
To: Christoph John <chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>>; qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>
Subject: RE: Messages resend request problem

Hi Chris,

Sure, here we go

2025-01-16 17:29:58,554  O 8=FIX.4.4 9=73 35=A 34=6999 49=XXXXXXX 52=20250116-17:29:58.553 56=YYYYYY 98=0 108=30 10=231
2025-01-16 17:30:28,555  O 8=FIX.4.4 9=73 35=A 34=7000 49=XXXXXXX 52=20250116-17:30:28.555 56=YYYYYY 98=0 108=30 10=196
2025-01-16 17:30:28,636  I 8=FIX.4.4 9=0069 35=A 49=YYYYYY 56=XXXXXXX 34=6903 52=20250116-17:30:28 98=0 108=30 10=103
2025-01-16 17:30:28,637  I 8=FIX.4.4 9=0069 35=2 49=YYYYYY 56=XXXXXXX 34=6904 52=20250116-17:30:28 7=6988 16=0 10=105
2025-01-16 17:30:28,637  O 8=FIX.4.4 9=73 35=2 34=7001 49=XXXXXXX 52=20250116-17:30:28.637 56=YYYYYY 7=6900 16=0 10=183

And as I mentioned before, QFJ responded by sending the messages 6988 to 7000 from different date (from two months ago!)

Regards,
Jalal
From: Christoph John <chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>>
Sent: 22 January 2025 17:03
To: qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>
Cc: Jalal Kharsa <jk...@gr...<mailto:jk...@gr...>>
Subject: RE: Messages resend request problem

You don't often get email from chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
[WARNING] External Email

Hi,

I assume QFJ responded with a resend that matches the ResendRequest that the other side sent.
Can you post the ResendRequest message that you received along with the Logon messages that were exchanged directly before the resend occurred?

Thanks
Chris

--
Christoph John
Software Engineering

D +49 241 557080 28
chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>

[cid:image001.png@01DB6DBB.C1D3B270]

MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
52066 Aachen, Germany
www.macd.com<http://www.macd.com/>

[cid:image002.png@01DB6DBB.C1D3B270]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/macd/>  [cid:image003.png@01DB6DBB.C1D3B270] <https://www.xing.com/pages/macd>

Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663
Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald

From: Jalal Kharsa via Quickfixj-users <qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>>
Sent: 22 January 2025 16:22
To: qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>
Cc: Jalal Kharsa <jk...@gr...<mailto:jk...@gr...>>
Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Messages resend request problem

Hi All,

I have established a connection as an Initiator that is communicating with an Acceptor (Server). I configured only the 'FileStorePath' element within the session's Storage settings, leaving the rest at their default values (FileStoreMaxCachedMsgs = 1000 and FileStoreSync=N).
Recently, a network blip occurred, causing the Acceptor to send a message resend request. However, instead of retrieving and resending the most recent messages, Quickfixj responded by sending messages from two months ago.

Can you provide any insight into the reason for this behavior and how it can be addressed?

Regards,
Jalal
Privileged or confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee of this message please notify the sender by return and thereafter delete the message, and you may not use, copy, disclose or rely on the information contained in it. Internet e-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment for which Gresham does not accept liability. Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that this e-mail and any attachments have been swept for viruses, Gresham does not accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses. Statements in this message that do not relate to the business of Gresham are neither given nor endorsed by the company or its directors. Gresham Technologies plc Registered in England and Wales. Company No. 01072032 Registered Office: Aldermary House, 10-15 Queen Street, London, EC4N 1TX. Further information about Gresham Technologies can be found on our website: www.greshamtech.com<http://www.greshamtech.com/>

Re: [Quickfixj-users] Messages resend request problem

[Jalal K. <jk...@gr...>]

Hi,

The sequence numbers are being reset daily, and the sequence numbers requested for the resend have repeatedly appeared over the past two months, as approximately 15,000 to 20,000 messages are exchanged daily. However, instead of retrieving messages with the requested sequence numbers from the most recent date, QuickFIX/J retrieves messages from two months ago.

I hope this provides further clarification.

Regards,
From: Christoph John <chr...@ma...>
Sent: 23 January 2025 15:59
To: Jalal Kharsa <jk...@gr...>; qui...@li...
Subject: RE: Messages resend request problem

You don't often get email from chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
[WARNING] External Email

Hi,

ok, but what is the issue? The messages that have been asked for were delivered. QFJ or FIX protocol respectively do not care about the date but only about the seqnum. Do you never reset your seqnums?
Or do you mean there were other messages resent that were not in the store? How should QFJ get messages from the store that are two months old? Shouldn't the seqnum advance more than 22 seqnums in two months?
I don't get the whole picture it seems. Maybe you can elaborate?

Thanks in advance and best regards
Chris


--
Christoph John
Software Engineering

D +49 241 557080 28
chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>

[cid:image001.png@01DB6DB1.165B1AF0]

MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
52066 Aachen, Germany
www.macd.com<http://www.macd.com/>

[cid:image002.png@01DB6DB1.165B1AF0]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/macd/>  [cid:image003.png@01DB6DB1.165B1AF0] <https://www.xing.com/pages/macd>

Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663
Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald

From: Jalal Kharsa <jk...@gr...<mailto:jk...@gr...>>
Sent: 23 January 2025 09:13
To: Christoph John <chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>>; qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>
Subject: RE: Messages resend request problem

Hi Chris,

Sure, here we go

2025-01-16 17:29:58,554  O 8=FIX.4.4 9=73 35=A 34=6999 49=XXXXXXX 52=20250116-17:29:58.553 56=YYYYYY 98=0 108=30 10=231
2025-01-16 17:30:28,555  O 8=FIX.4.4 9=73 35=A 34=7000 49=XXXXXXX 52=20250116-17:30:28.555 56=YYYYYY 98=0 108=30 10=196
2025-01-16 17:30:28,636  I 8=FIX.4.4 9=0069 35=A 49=YYYYYY 56=XXXXXXX 34=6903 52=20250116-17:30:28 98=0 108=30 10=103
2025-01-16 17:30:28,637  I 8=FIX.4.4 9=0069 35=2 49=YYYYYY 56=XXXXXXX 34=6904 52=20250116-17:30:28 7=6988 16=0 10=105
2025-01-16 17:30:28,637  O 8=FIX.4.4 9=73 35=2 34=7001 49=XXXXXXX 52=20250116-17:30:28.637 56=YYYYYY 7=6900 16=0 10=183

And as I mentioned before, QFJ responded by sending the messages 6988 to 7000 from different date (from two months ago!)

Regards,
Jalal
From: Christoph John <chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>>
Sent: 22 January 2025 17:03
To: qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>
Cc: Jalal Kharsa <jk...@gr...<mailto:jk...@gr...>>
Subject: RE: Messages resend request problem

You don't often get email from chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
[WARNING] External Email

Hi,

I assume QFJ responded with a resend that matches the ResendRequest that the other side sent.
Can you post the ResendRequest message that you received along with the Logon messages that were exchanged directly before the resend occurred?

Thanks
Chris

--
Christoph John
Software Engineering

D +49 241 557080 28
chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>

[cid:image001.png@01DB6DB1.165B1AF0]

MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
52066 Aachen, Germany
www.macd.com<http://www.macd.com/>

[cid:image002.png@01DB6DB1.165B1AF0]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/macd/>  [cid:image003.png@01DB6DB1.165B1AF0] <https://www.xing.com/pages/macd>

Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663
Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald

From: Jalal Kharsa via Quickfixj-users <qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>>
Sent: 22 January 2025 16:22
To: qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>
Cc: Jalal Kharsa <jk...@gr...<mailto:jk...@gr...>>
Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Messages resend request problem

Hi All,

I have established a connection as an Initiator that is communicating with an Acceptor (Server). I configured only the 'FileStorePath' element within the session's Storage settings, leaving the rest at their default values (FileStoreMaxCachedMsgs = 1000 and FileStoreSync=N).
Recently, a network blip occurred, causing the Acceptor to send a message resend request. However, instead of retrieving and resending the most recent messages, Quickfixj responded by sending messages from two months ago.

Can you provide any insight into the reason for this behavior and how it can be addressed?

Regards,
Jalal
Privileged or confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee of this message please notify the sender by return and thereafter delete the message, and you may not use, copy, disclose or rely on the information contained in it. Internet e-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment for which Gresham does not accept liability. Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that this e-mail and any attachments have been swept for viruses, Gresham does not accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses. Statements in this message that do not relate to the business of Gresham are neither given nor endorsed by the company or its directors. Gresham Technologies plc Registered in England and Wales. Company No. 01072032 Registered Office: Aldermary House, 10-15 Queen Street, London, EC4N 1TX. Further information about Gresham Technologies can be found on our website: www.greshamtech.com<http://www.greshamtech.com/>

Re: [Quickfixj-users] Messages resend request problem

[Christoph J. <chr...@ma...>]

Hi,

ok, but what is the issue? The messages that have been asked for were delivered. QFJ or FIX protocol respectively do not care about the date but only about the seqnum. Do you never reset your seqnums?
Or do you mean there were other messages resent that were not in the store? How should QFJ get messages from the store that are two months old? Shouldn't the seqnum advance more than 22 seqnums in two months?
I don't get the whole picture it seems. Maybe you can elaborate?

Thanks in advance and best regards
Chris


--
Christoph John
Software Engineering

D +49 241 557080 28
chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>

[cid:image001.png@01DB6DB8.13C095C0]

MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
52066 Aachen, Germany
www.macd.com<http://www.macd.com/>

[cid:image002.png@01DB6DB8.13C095C0]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/macd/>  [cid:image003.png@01DB6DB8.13C095C0] <https://www.xing.com/pages/macd>

Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663
Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald

From: Jalal Kharsa <jk...@gr...>
Sent: 23 January 2025 09:13
To: Christoph John <chr...@ma...>; qui...@li...
Subject: RE: Messages resend request problem

Hi Chris,

Sure, here we go

2025-01-16 17:29:58,554  O 8=FIX.4.4 9=73 35=A 34=6999 49=XXXXXXX 52=20250116-17:29:58.553 56=YYYYYY 98=0 108=30 10=231
2025-01-16 17:30:28,555  O 8=FIX.4.4 9=73 35=A 34=7000 49=XXXXXXX 52=20250116-17:30:28.555 56=YYYYYY 98=0 108=30 10=196
2025-01-16 17:30:28,636  I 8=FIX.4.4 9=0069 35=A 49=YYYYYY 56=XXXXXXX 34=6903 52=20250116-17:30:28 98=0 108=30 10=103
2025-01-16 17:30:28,637  I 8=FIX.4.4 9=0069 35=2 49=YYYYYY 56=XXXXXXX 34=6904 52=20250116-17:30:28 7=6988 16=0 10=105
2025-01-16 17:30:28,637  O 8=FIX.4.4 9=73 35=2 34=7001 49=XXXXXXX 52=20250116-17:30:28.637 56=YYYYYY 7=6900 16=0 10=183

And as I mentioned before, QFJ responded by sending the messages 6988 to 7000 from different date (from two months ago!)

Regards,
Jalal
From: Christoph John <chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>>
Sent: 22 January 2025 17:03
To: qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>
Cc: Jalal Kharsa <jk...@gr...<mailto:jk...@gr...>>
Subject: RE: Messages resend request problem

You don't often get email from chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
[WARNING] External Email

Hi,

I assume QFJ responded with a resend that matches the ResendRequest that the other side sent.
Can you post the ResendRequest message that you received along with the Logon messages that were exchanged directly before the resend occurred?

Thanks
Chris

--
Christoph John
Software Engineering

D +49 241 557080 28
chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>

[cid:image001.png@01DB6DB8.13C095C0]

MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
52066 Aachen, Germany
www.macd.com<http://www.macd.com/>

[cid:image002.png@01DB6DB8.13C095C0]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/macd/>  [cid:image003.png@01DB6DB8.13C095C0] <https://www.xing.com/pages/macd>

Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663
Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald

From: Jalal Kharsa via Quickfixj-users <qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>>
Sent: 22 January 2025 16:22
To: qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>
Cc: Jalal Kharsa <jk...@gr...<mailto:jk...@gr...>>
Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Messages resend request problem

Hi All,

I have established a connection as an Initiator that is communicating with an Acceptor (Server). I configured only the 'FileStorePath' element within the session's Storage settings, leaving the rest at their default values (FileStoreMaxCachedMsgs = 1000 and FileStoreSync=N).
Recently, a network blip occurred, causing the Acceptor to send a message resend request. However, instead of retrieving and resending the most recent messages, Quickfixj responded by sending messages from two months ago.

Can you provide any insight into the reason for this behavior and how it can be addressed?

Regards,
Jalal
Privileged or confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee of this message please notify the sender by return and thereafter delete the message, and you may not use, copy, disclose or rely on the information contained in it. Internet e-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment for which Gresham does not accept liability. Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that this e-mail and any attachments have been swept for viruses, Gresham does not accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses. Statements in this message that do not relate to the business of Gresham are neither given nor endorsed by the company or its directors. Gresham Technologies plc Registered in England and Wales. Company No. 01072032 Registered Office: Aldermary House, 10-15 Queen Street, London, EC4N 1TX. Further information about Gresham Technologies can be found on our website: www.greshamtech.com<http://www.greshamtech.com/>

Re: [Quickfixj-users] Messages resend request problem

[Jalal K. <jk...@gr...>]

Hi Chris,

Sure, here we go

2025-01-16 17:29:58,554  O 8=FIX.4.4 9=73 35=A 34=6999 49=XXXXXXX 52=20250116-17:29:58.553 56=YYYYYY 98=0 108=30 10=231
2025-01-16 17:30:28,555  O 8=FIX.4.4 9=73 35=A 34=7000 49=XXXXXXX 52=20250116-17:30:28.555 56=YYYYYY 98=0 108=30 10=196
2025-01-16 17:30:28,636  I 8=FIX.4.4 9=0069 35=A 49=YYYYYY 56=XXXXXXX 34=6903 52=20250116-17:30:28 98=0 108=30 10=103
2025-01-16 17:30:28,637  I 8=FIX.4.4 9=0069 35=2 49=YYYYYY 56=XXXXXXX 34=6904 52=20250116-17:30:28 7=6988 16=0 10=105
2025-01-16 17:30:28,637  O 8=FIX.4.4 9=73 35=2 34=7001 49=XXXXXXX 52=20250116-17:30:28.637 56=YYYYYY 7=6900 16=0 10=183

And as I mentioned before, QFJ responded by sending the messages 6988 to 7000 from different date (from two months ago!)

Regards,
Jalal
From: Christoph John <chr...@ma...>
Sent: 22 January 2025 17:03
To: qui...@li...
Cc: Jalal Kharsa <jk...@gr...>
Subject: RE: Messages resend request problem

You don't often get email from chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
[WARNING] External Email

Hi,

I assume QFJ responded with a resend that matches the ResendRequest that the other side sent.
Can you post the ResendRequest message that you received along with the Logon messages that were exchanged directly before the resend occurred?

Thanks
Chris

--
Christoph John
Software Engineering

D +49 241 557080 28
chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>

[cid:image005.png@01DB6D6E.3578A210]

MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
52066 Aachen, Germany
www.macd.com<http://www.macd.com/>

[cid:image006.png@01DB6D6E.3578A210]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/macd/>  [cid:image007.png@01DB6D6E.3578A210] <https://www.xing.com/pages/macd>

Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663
Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald

From: Jalal Kharsa via Quickfixj-users <qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>>
Sent: 22 January 2025 16:22
To: qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>
Cc: Jalal Kharsa <jk...@gr...<mailto:jk...@gr...>>
Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Messages resend request problem

Hi All,

I have established a connection as an Initiator that is communicating with an Acceptor (Server). I configured only the 'FileStorePath' element within the session's Storage settings, leaving the rest at their default values (FileStoreMaxCachedMsgs = 1000 and FileStoreSync=N).
Recently, a network blip occurred, causing the Acceptor to send a message resend request. However, instead of retrieving and resending the most recent messages, Quickfixj responded by sending messages from two months ago.

Can you provide any insight into the reason for this behavior and how it can be addressed?

Regards,
Jalal
Privileged or confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee of this message please notify the sender by return and thereafter delete the message, and you may not use, copy, disclose or rely on the information contained in it. Internet e-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment for which Gresham does not accept liability. Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that this e-mail and any attachments have been swept for viruses, Gresham does not accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses. Statements in this message that do not relate to the business of Gresham are neither given nor endorsed by the company or its directors. Gresham Technologies plc Registered in England and Wales. Company No. 01072032 Registered Office: Aldermary House, 10-15 Queen Street, London, EC4N 1TX. Further information about Gresham Technologies can be found on our website: www.greshamtech.com<http://www.greshamtech.com/>

Re: [Quickfixj-users] Messages resend request problem

[Christoph J. <chr...@ma...>]

Hi,

I assume QFJ responded with a resend that matches the ResendRequest that the other side sent.
Can you post the ResendRequest message that you received along with the Logon messages that were exchanged directly before the resend occurred?

Thanks
Chris

--
Christoph John
Software Engineering

D +49 241 557080 28
chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>

[cid:image001.png@01DB6CF7.C3BC6FB0]

MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
52066 Aachen, Germany
www.macd.com<http://www.macd.com/>

[cid:image002.png@01DB6CF7.C3BC6FB0]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/macd/>  [cid:image003.png@01DB6CF7.C3BC6FB0] <https://www.xing.com/pages/macd>

Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663
Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald

From: Jalal Kharsa via Quickfixj-users <qui...@li...>
Sent: 22 January 2025 16:22
To: qui...@li...
Cc: Jalal Kharsa <jk...@gr...>
Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Messages resend request problem

Hi All,

I have established a connection as an Initiator that is communicating with an Acceptor (Server). I configured only the 'FileStorePath' element within the session's Storage settings, leaving the rest at their default values (FileStoreMaxCachedMsgs = 1000 and FileStoreSync=N).
Recently, a network blip occurred, causing the Acceptor to send a message resend request. However, instead of retrieving and resending the most recent messages, Quickfixj responded by sending messages from two months ago.

Can you provide any insight into the reason for this behavior and how it can be addressed?

Regards,
Jalal
Privileged or confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee of this message please notify the sender by return and thereafter delete the message, and you may not use, copy, disclose or rely on the information contained in it. Internet e-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment for which Gresham does not accept liability. Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that this e-mail and any attachments have been swept for viruses, Gresham does not accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses. Statements in this message that do not relate to the business of Gresham are neither given nor endorsed by the company or its directors. Gresham Technologies plc Registered in England and Wales. Company No. 01072032 Registered Office: Aldermary House, 10-15 Queen Street, London, EC4N 1TX. Further information about Gresham Technologies can be found on our website: www.greshamtech.com<http://www.greshamtech.com/>

[Quickfixj-users] Messages resend request problem

[Jalal K. <jk...@gr...>]

Hi All,

I have established a connection as an Initiator that is communicating with an Acceptor (Server). I configured only the 'FileStorePath' element within the session's Storage settings, leaving the rest at their default values (FileStoreMaxCachedMsgs = 1000 and FileStoreSync=N).
Recently, a network blip occurred, causing the Acceptor to send a message resend request. However, instead of retrieving and resending the most recent messages, Quickfixj responded by sending messages from two months ago.

Can you provide any insight into the reason for this behavior and how it can be addressed?

Regards,
Jalal
Privileged or confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee of this message please notify the sender by return and thereafter delete the message, and you may not use, copy, disclose or rely on the information contained in it. Internet e-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment for which Gresham does not accept liability. Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that this e-mail and any attachments have been swept for viruses, Gresham does not accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses. Statements in this message that do not relate to the business of Gresham are neither given nor endorsed by the company or its directors. Gresham Technologies plc Registered in England and Wales. Company No. 01072032 Registered Office: Aldermary House, 10-15 Queen Street, London, EC4N 1TX. Further information about Gresham Technologies can be found on our website: www.greshamtech.com

[Quickfixj-users] QuickFIX/J 2.3.2 has been released

[Christoph J. <chr...@ma...>]

This is a bug fix release.
It contains only few bug fixes and upgrades the MINA library to 2.2.4 since prior versions are vulnerable to RCE: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52046 . However, QFJ is not directly affected by this since it does not use the affected ObjectSerializationCodecFactory.

Libraries are available on Sonatype Central or https://github.com/quickfix-j/quickfixj/releases/tag/QFJ_RELEASE_2_3_2

Cheers
Chris

--
Christoph John
Software Engineering

D +49 241 557080 28
chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>

[cid:image001.png@01DB6365.43DB64E0]

MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
52066 Aachen, Germany
www.macd.com<http://www.macd.com/>

[cid:image002.png@01DB6365.43DB64E0]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/macd/>  [cid:image003.png@01DB6365.43DB64E0] <https://www.xing.com/pages/macd>

Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663
Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald

[Quickfixj-users] Seeking Open Source Tool for Analyzing QFJ Database Logs

[Felipe W. <fel...@gm...>]

Dear QuickFIX/J Community,

I hope this message finds you well.

I'm currently using Tibco Spotfire and direct SQL instructions to analyze
session events and message logs stored in QuickFIX/J. In my setup, I have
separate messages_log tables for incoming and outgoing messages, along with
an event_log table.

While this approach works, I'm curious if there's an existing open-source
tool specifically designed to read these tables and provide a more
streamlined interface for data analysis. If not, I'm considering building a
solution to address this need.

Any suggestions or insights would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you for your assistance.

Best regards,

Felipe Windmoller

Re: [Quickfixj-users] How do I regenerate the message/field sources?

[Grant B. <gbi...@co...>]

I did end up solving this, but I feel like it should have been simpler.

Details in my self-answer to my StackOverflow question here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79071860/how-to-regenerate-quickfix-j-sources-from-my-custom-datadictionary

On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 2:12 PM Grant Birchmeier <gbi...@co...>
wrote:

> How do I regenerate the message/field sources based on my custom data
> dictionary?
>
> I used to know how to do it back in the `ant` days, but it seems a lot has
> changed.  I have so far been unable to find any documentation that tells me
> what command or task to actually run.
>
> The readme says to use "mvnw clean install", but I'm not seeing any code
> for my new custom fields/messages after I run it.
>
> Here's what I've done to set it up.
> * I added my custom DD xml file
> to quickfixj-messages/quickfixj-messages-fix50sp2/src/main/resources
> * I updated quickfixj-messages/quickfixj-messages-fix50sp2/pom.xml to
> only include my custom DD, and exclude the others
>
> What do I need to do to actually run the generator?
>
> Thanks
> -Grant
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> <https://www.connamara.com>
>
> Grant Birchmeier
>
> Director of Engineering, Connamara
>
> gbi...@co...
>


-- 
<https://www.connamara.com>

Grant Birchmeier

Director of Engineering, Connamara

gbi...@co...

-- 
This email, along with any attachments, is confidential. If you believe you 
received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and 
delete all copies of the message. Thank you from Connamara Systems, LLC.

[Quickfixj-users] How do I regenerate the message/field sources?

[Grant B. <gbi...@co...>]

How do I regenerate the message/field sources based on my custom data
dictionary?

I used to know how to do it back in the `ant` days, but it seems a lot has
changed.  I have so far been unable to find any documentation that tells me
what command or task to actually run.

The readme says to use "mvnw clean install", but I'm not seeing any code
for my new custom fields/messages after I run it.

Here's what I've done to set it up.
* I added my custom DD xml file
to quickfixj-messages/quickfixj-messages-fix50sp2/src/main/resources
* I updated quickfixj-messages/quickfixj-messages-fix50sp2/pom.xml to
only include my custom DD, and exclude the others

What do I need to do to actually run the generator?

Thanks
-Grant





-- 
<https://www.connamara.com>

Grant Birchmeier

Director of Engineering, Connamara

gbi...@co...

-- 
This email, along with any attachments, is confidential. If you believe you 
received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and 
delete all copies of the message. Thank you from Connamara Systems, LLC.

[Quickfixj-users] Test, please ignore

[Christoph J. <chr...@ma...>]

This is the body of the mail

Re: [Quickfixj-users] Seeking Advice on Implementing QFJ Acceptor with Internet Connectivity

[Christoph J. <chr...@ma...>]

You're welcome. :)


________________________________
From: Felipe Windmoller <fel...@gm...>
Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2024 6:39:43 PM
To: qui...@li... <qui...@li...>
Subject: Re: [Quickfixj-users] Seeking Advice on Implementing QFJ Acceptor with Internet Connectivity

QFJ Documentation: https://che01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.quickfixj.org%2Fdocumentation%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristoph.john%40macd.com%7Ca7e443d15c4f42613a7f08dc83225c9f%7Cfb673ffa32b24d71b08c8c56f99c56ca%7C0%7C0%7C638529431828442136%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2BSt%2Be0EaamDb1rxTxEtmXOkoycAZRz5pdvutULLZ2cg%3D&reserved=0<http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/>
QFJ Support: https://che01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.quickfixj.org%2Fsupport%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristoph.john%40macd.com%7Ca7e443d15c4f42613a7f08dc83225c9f%7Cfb673ffa32b24d71b08c8c56f99c56ca%7C0%7C0%7C638529431828450448%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Kq2tGSa8LOzVjmNOvQut68XlhdGn%2FixYxC8E%2B6luEks%3D&reserved=0<http://www.quickfixj.org/support/>

Re: [Quickfixj-users] Seeking Advice on Implementing QFJ Acceptor with Internet Connectivity

[Felipe W. <fel...@gm...>]

Hi Chris, I really appreciate your advices.

Thanks a lot!

Felipe Windmoller

Em dom., 2 de jun. de 2024 13:12, Christoph John <chr...@ma...>
escreveu:

> QFJ Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QFJ Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>
>
> Hi Felipe,
>
> at first I would advise to use the most current version 2.3.1 but I assume
> you are doing that anyway. Former versions contain a nasty bug which an
> attacker could use to DOS your FIX connection.
>
> There also is the AllowedRemoteAddresses config but since you are using a
> firewall it probably is not needed.
>
> And last not least there is a white paper which I recommend reading:
> https://www.fixtrading.org/packages/fix-security-white-paper-v1-9/
> But from what I remember you are planning to do the best practices from
> that document already.
>
> Best regards
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfixj-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
>

Re: [Quickfixj-users] PartyRiskLimitsRequest

[Christoph J. <chr...@ma...>]

Hi,

That message type was added in FIX5.0SP2 *EP105*, so is not part of the original SP2.
You need to alter you data dictionary to contain that message type (or take the dictionary from FIX.Latest) and rebuild QFJ.

Instructions on building are on the github site: https://github.com/quickfix-j/quickfixj
Or if you are using 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT there is a doc specifically on building custom message builds here: https://github.com/quickfix-j/quickfixj/tree/master/quickfixj-messages


Cheers
Chris



Original mail:

>Hi,
>
>I would like to process PartyRiskLimitsRequest and send back PartyRiskLimitsReportAck. I believe these are part of the FIX 5.0 SP2 message types.
>
>I do not find them in the quickfixJ 5.0 SP2 package.
>
>May I ask what the best way for me to support these message types using quickfixJ?
>
>Thank you!
>
>Eric

--
Christoph John
Software Engineering

D +49 241 557080 28
chr...@ma...<mailto:chr...@ma...>

[cid:image001.png@01DAB036.54707670]

MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
52066 Aachen, Germany
www.macd.com<http://www.macd.com/>

[cid:image002.png@01DAB036.54707670]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/macd/>  [cid:image003.png@01DAB036.54707670] <https://www.xing.com/pages/macd>

Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663
Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald

From: mare_delis_0h--- via Quickfixj-users <qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>>
Sent: 14 May 2024 11:51
To: qui...@li...<mailto:qui...@li...>
Cc: mar...@ic...<mailto:mar...@ic...>
Subject: [Quickfixj-users] PartyRiskLimitsRequest

QFJ Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QFJ Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/

_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
Qui...@li...<mailto:Qui...@li...>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users

Re: [Quickfixj-users] Seeking Advice on Implementing QFJ Acceptor with Internet Connectivity

[Christoph J. <chr...@ma...>]

Hi Felipe,

at first I would advise to use the most current version 2.3.1 but I assume you are doing that anyway. Former versions contain a nasty bug which an attacker could use to DOS your FIX connection.

There also is the AllowedRemoteAddresses config but since you are using a firewall it probably is not needed.

And last not least there is a white paper which I recommend reading:
https://www.fixtrading.org/packages/fix-security-white-paper-v1-9/
But from what I remember you are planning to do the best practices from that document already.

Best regards
Chris

[Quickfixj-users] Seeking Advice on Implementing QFJ Acceptor with Internet Connectivity

[Felipe W. <fel...@gm...>]

Dear QFJ Community,

I hope this message finds you well.

I am currently exploring the possibility of configuring a QuickFIX/J (QFJ)
acceptor that allows connections over the internet. Given the security
implications, I would greatly appreciate your guidance on best practices
and any suggestions you might have.

Here is the approach I am considering:

   1. Firewall Configuration: Only allow connections from whitelisted IP
   addresses to ensure that only trusted clients can reach the acceptor
   application.
   2. Mutual TLS (mTLS): Implement mTLS for client and server
   authentication, ensuring that both parties are verified via certificates.
   3. Encrypted Data: Use SSL/TLS to encrypt all data transmitted over the
   FIX session.
   4. Session Password: Require a password for the FIX session to add an
   additional layer of security.

I believe that combining these measures will provide a robust security
framework for our QFJ acceptor. However, I am seeking confirmation from the
community and any additional recommendations you might have.

Thank you in advance for your time and assistance.

Best regards, Felipe Windmoller

[Quickfixj-users] PartyRiskLimitsRequest

[<mar...@ic...>]

Hi,

I would like to process PartyRiskLimitsRequest and send back PartyRiskLimitsReportAck. I believe these are part of the FIX 5.0 SP2 message types.

I do not find them in the quickfixJ 5.0 SP2 package. 

May I ask what the best way for me to support these message types using quickfixJ?

Thank you!

Eric

Re: [Quickfixj-users] Asynchronous logging of quickfixj message store and log file path

[Grant B. <gbi...@co...>]

You could pretty easily implement your own custom LogFactory to implement
asynchronous logging.

I see no reason why it wouldn't work, but if the app crashes I might be a
little concerned about missed logging during the lag between message
received and asynch-log handling.  But you can probably code to account for
that.

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:13 AM Ankit Mehta <ank...@gm...>
wrote:

> QFJ Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QFJ Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>
>
> Sorry, yes the store manages the sequence numbers so it should be logged
> synchronously to maintain the order.
> But the FileLogPath , that logs the messages and events, do those have to
> be mandatorily synchronously logged as well? If not, is there a way to
> write those asynchronously?
>
> Regards,
> Ankit
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 8:12 PM Grant Birchmeier <gbi...@co...>
> wrote:
>
>> QFJ Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
>> QFJ Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>>
>>
>> The *store* should not be asynchronous -- it literally reflects the state
>> of your connection!
>>
>> Unless I'm missing something...?
>>
>> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 6:16 AM Ankit Mehta <ank...@gm...>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> QFJ Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
>>> QFJ Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>>>
>>>
>>> hello team,
>>>
>>> We have recently moved over to Asynchronous logging using log4j2 for our
>>> application to improve the performance during high volume days.
>>>
>>> While our application is logging asynchronously, we were wondering if
>>> there is a way we can get the quickfixj FileStorePath and FileStorePath
>>> logging to be switched over to Asynchronous as well?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ankit
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Quickfixj-users mailing list
>>> Qui...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> <https://www.connamara.com>
>>
>> Grant Birchmeier
>>
>> Sr. Software Engineer, Connamara
>>
>> gbi...@co...
>>
>> This email, along with any attachments, is confidential. If you believe
>> you received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately
>> and delete all copies of the message. Thank you from Connamara Systems, LLC.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Quickfixj-users mailing list
>> Qui...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfixj-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
>


-- 
<https://www.connamara.com>

Grant Birchmeier

Sr. Software Engineer, Connamara

gbi...@co...

-- 
This email, along with any attachments, is confidential. If you believe you 
received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and 
delete all copies of the message. Thank you from Connamara Systems, LLC.

Re: [Quickfixj-users] Asynchronous logging of quickfixj message store and log file path

[Ankit M. <ank...@gm...>]

Sorry, yes the store manages the sequence numbers so it should be logged
synchronously to maintain the order.
But the FileLogPath , that logs the messages and events, do those have to
be mandatorily synchronously logged as well? If not, is there a way to
write those asynchronously?

Regards,
Ankit

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 8:12 PM Grant Birchmeier <gbi...@co...>
wrote:

> QFJ Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QFJ Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>
>
> The *store* should not be asynchronous -- it literally reflects the state
> of your connection!
>
> Unless I'm missing something...?
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 6:16 AM Ankit Mehta <ank...@gm...>
> wrote:
>
>> QFJ Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
>> QFJ Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>>
>>
>> hello team,
>>
>> We have recently moved over to Asynchronous logging using log4j2 for our
>> application to improve the performance during high volume days.
>>
>> While our application is logging asynchronously, we were wondering if
>> there is a way we can get the quickfixj FileStorePath and FileStorePath
>> logging to be switched over to Asynchronous as well?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ankit
>> _______________________________________________
>> Quickfixj-users mailing list
>> Qui...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
>>
>
>
> --
> <https://www.connamara.com>
>
> Grant Birchmeier
>
> Sr. Software Engineer, Connamara
>
> gbi...@co...
>
> This email, along with any attachments, is confidential. If you believe
> you received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete all copies of the message. Thank you from Connamara Systems, LLC.
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfixj-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
>

Re: [Quickfixj-users] Asynchronous logging of quickfixj message store and log file path

[Grant B. <gbi...@co...>]

The *store* should not be asynchronous -- it literally reflects the state
of your connection!

Unless I'm missing something...?

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 6:16 AM Ankit Mehta <ank...@gm...>
wrote:

> QFJ Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QFJ Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>
>
> hello team,
>
> We have recently moved over to Asynchronous logging using log4j2 for our
> application to improve the performance during high volume days.
>
> While our application is logging asynchronously, we were wondering if
> there is a way we can get the quickfixj FileStorePath and FileStorePath
> logging to be switched over to Asynchronous as well?
>
> Regards,
> Ankit
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfixj-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
>


-- 
<https://www.connamara.com>

Grant Birchmeier

Sr. Software Engineer, Connamara

gbi...@co...

-- 
This email, along with any attachments, is confidential. If you believe you 
received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and 
delete all copies of the message. Thank you from Connamara Systems, LLC.

[Quickfixj-users] Asynchronous logging of quickfixj message store and log file path

[Ankit M. <ank...@gm...>]

hello team,

We have recently moved over to Asynchronous logging using log4j2 for our
application to improve the performance during high volume days.

While our application is logging asynchronously, we were wondering if there
is a way we can get the quickfixj FileStorePath and FileStorePath logging
to be switched over to Asynchronous as well?

Regards,
Ankit

Re: [Quickfixj-users] FIX 5.0 data dictionary

[Philip W. <Phi...@fl...>]

You can find the default dictionary for FIX 5.0 here:
https://github.com/quickfix-j/quickfixj/blob/master/quickfixj-messages/quickfixj-messages-fix50/src/main/resources/FIX50.xml


Philip Whitehouse
Senior Software Engineer, FIX Platform Team, FlexTrade Systems

-----Original Message-----
From: Gaurav Kumar <kum...@gm...>
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 5:07 PM
To: qui...@li...
Subject: [Quickfixj-users] FIX 5.0 data dictionary

ATTENTION: This email was sent from someone outside of FlexTrade. Always use caution when opening attachments or clicking links.

QFJ Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QFJ Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/




This communication is for informational purposes only. The contents of this transmission are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete this message from your system. FlexTrade Systems Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliates do not guarantee the completeness and accuracy of this transmission's contents. Moreover, FlexTrade Systems Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliates do not guarantee this communication to be free of viruses and accept no liability for any damage caused thereof.

Re: [Quickfixj-users] FIX 5.0 data dictionary

[Colin D. <co...@ma...>]

Quickfix has several FIX 5.0 dictionaries: FIX50.xml, FIX50SP1.xml, and FIX50SP2.xml.

Starting with FIX 5.0, though, the dictionaries are split into transport and data, so, you’ll also find FIXT 1.1, which you could consider to be part of the 5.0 spec.

> On Apr 10, 2024, at 9:06 AM, Gaurav Kumar <kum...@gm...> wrote:
> 
> QFJ Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QFJ Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
> 
> 
> Hi All
> 
> I am new to the FIX, working on FIX 5.0 but I am unable to find the standard  data dictionary for the same.
> 
> Does Quickfix uses any default data dictionary for 5.0? Or I need to create one by myself.
> 
> Regards
> Gaurav
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfixj-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users

Re: [Quickfixj-users] FIX 5.0 data dictionary

[Grant B. <gbi...@co...>]

You mean this one?
https://github.com/quickfix-j/quickfixj/blob/master/quickfixj-messages/quickfixj-messages-fix50/src/main/resources/FIX50.xml

And you also need the FIXT11 DD:
https://github.com/quickfix-j/quickfixj/blob/master/quickfixj-messages/quickfixj-messages-fixt11/src/main/resources/FIXT11.xml

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:07 AM Gaurav Kumar <kum...@gm...>
wrote:

> QFJ Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QFJ Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>
>
> Hi All
>
> I am new to the FIX, working on FIX 5.0 but I am unable to find the
> standard  data dictionary for the same.
>
> Does Quickfix uses any default data dictionary for 5.0? Or I need to
> create one by myself.
>
> Regards
> Gaurav
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfixj-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
>


-- 
<https://www.connamara.com>

Grant Birchmeier

Sr. Software Engineer, Connamara

gbi...@co...

-- 
This email, along with any attachments, is confidential. If you believe you 
received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and 
delete all copies of the message. Thank you from Connamara Systems, LLC.

[Quickfixj-users] FIX 5.0 data dictionary

[Gaurav K. <kum...@gm...>]

Hi All

I am new to the FIX, working on FIX 5.0 but I am unable to find the
standard  data dictionary for the same.

Does Quickfix uses any default data dictionary for 5.0? Or I need to create
one by myself.

Regards
Gaurav