Re: [Quickfixj-users] Validations. Different values for the same field for the different messages

[Егор М. <eg...@gm...>]

John,

Oh, You are right about NewOrderSingle. Sorry for this.  Mistake in
specification from client side.

We  are not going use real client-server communication flow.
Just receive  several messages.
And we have some different validation rules for the different messages.

Thanks a lot for help!


чт, 3 окт. 2019 г. в 13:14, Christoph John <chr...@ma...>:
>
> Hi,
>
> no that is not possible to be specified in the dictionary. You will need to do such validations in your application code.
> But do you have a real-life example for this? Because the OrdStatus is a bad example since it does not occur on a NewOrderSingle. And besides, quite often fields from the order are echoed back on the ExecutionReport so I cannot think of a use-case for this right now. But maybe there is. Please elaborate.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris.
>
>
> On 03.10.19 12:08, Егор Мороз wrote:
>
> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Please help me with this.
>
> Is it possible to validate different values for the same field for the different messages using dictionary xml file.
>
> For example i have two message NewOrderSingle and ExecutionReport and field OrdStatus.
>
> For NewOrderSingle the valid values are :  Accepted, PartiallyFilled, Filled, DoneForDay
>
> For ExecutionReport : Accepted, PartiallyFilled.
>
> I tried different variants but I can set OrdStatus values only for all messages globally.
>
> Thanks for help!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfixj-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
>
>
> --
> Christoph John
> Software Engineering
> T +49 241 557080-28
> chr...@ma...
>
> MACD GmbH
> Oppenhoffallee 103
> 52066 Aachen, Germany
> www.macd.com
>
> Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
> Ust.-Id: DE 813021663
> Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald