|
From: Christoph J. <chr...@ma...> - 2018-08-13 07:53:42
|
Hi, which version of QFJ are you using? Starting from version QFJ 2.0.0 the parsing of unknown repeating group tags should have been improved. See https://github.com/quickfix-j/quickfixj/pull/106 Of course there are limits in recongnizing whether the tag belongs to a specific repeating group instance. So at least the delimiter tag should be correctly specified in the data dictionary. Chris. On 10/08/18 11:15, ToonXW wrote: > QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ > QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ > > > Hi, > > Upon receiving a multileg TradeCaptureReport (MsgType=AE) where field 555 is > set to 2 and comes with two fields 654 followed by the respective leg tags; > but upon retrieving the message via fromApp it is seen that field 555's > value has been switched from 2 to 1 and all legs were dropped, i.e. tag 654s > disappear along with the rest of the tags. Please advise on why this is > happening as the goal is to *retain the original message obtained and not > have any processing done to it* - most validation have been turned off. > > Config: > UseDataDictionary=Y > ValidateFieldsOutOfOrder=N > ValidateFieldsHaveValues=N > ValidateUserDefinedFields=N > ValidateIncomingMessage=N > AllowUnknownMsgFields=Y > > Many thanks. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://quickfix-j.364392.n2.nabble.com/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Quickfixj-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users -- Christoph John Software Engineering T +49 241 557080-28 chr...@ma... MACD GmbH Oppenhoffallee 103 52066 Aachen, Germany www.macd.com Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151 Ust.-Id: DE 813021663 Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald |