Re: [Quickfixj-users] 100% Java vs the QuickFIX C++ JNI Wrapper

[Toli K. <to...@ma...>]

Ted,

the Quickfix/J itself is 100% Java. There's a separate C++ project that's
also an implementation of FIX called QuickFIX (
http://www.quickfixengine.org/) which is the original open-source FIX
implementation. It has a JNI wrapper, and QFJ is compatible with that.  It
is meant as a way for people to transition from their existing QuickFIX JNI
implementations.

The QuickFIX project was the initial "inspiration" for QFJ, but QFJ has
obviously been written in Java from scratch.

so if you are writing Java code, then just use QFJ directly.

On 9/28/07, Ted Graham <tg...@co...> wrote:
>
> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
> I'm confused about something on the main website.   It says that
> QuickFIX/J
> is 100% Java, but it also talks about "Compatibility with QuickFIX C++
> Java
> Native Wrapper API".  The section on QuickFIXJ logging says, "QuickFIX/J
> is
> based on the QuickFIX C++ JNI API"
>
> What does the JNI API provide, and when should I use it?
>
> Any explanation or pointers to resources appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Ted
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfixj-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
>



-- 
Toli Kuznets
http://www.marketcetera.com: Open-Source Trading Platform
download.run.trade.