[Quickfixj-users] Which quickfix.field package to use

[Ashley W. <ash...@db...>]

Hi,

I have another newbie question, this time about the generated 
quickfix.field package.

I'm trying to run the generator against the fix xml files I've inherited 
from the previous developer and I get another quickfix.field package 
similar to the one in the quickfix-core, but obviously customized due to 
the spec changes I'm putting through. But one puzzle is that.the 
SecurityTradingStatus class in the generated code contains a constant 
called NO_OPENNO_RESUME whereas the one that comes with the latest 
quickfix-core jar file contains a constant called NO_OPEN_NO_RESUME - note 
the extra underscore.

So it appears I'll have to pay careful attention to the order of the jar 
files in the classpaths for compilation and runtime.

Maybe my approach of shipping the quickfix-core along with a second jar 
file that contains all of the code that came out of the generator 
(including the quickfix.field package) is wrong. I could possibly modify 
the quickfix-core to remove its version of quickfix.field but this feels a 
little clunky to me.

Any pointers greatly appreciated.

Thanks
- Ashley

---

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.

Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.