|
From: Steve B. <st...@te...> - 2007-04-24 11:29:31
|
Hi Jeronimo, I'm not seeing the acceptor behavior you're describing but I do see some strange behavior on the initiator side. It appears the MINA layer is being initialized properly but I am seeing some connection problems on the secure socket with a mixture of secure and unsecure initiator connections. I'll extend the SecureSocketTest to include this scenario but since I'll be out of the office for about a week it won't happen immediately. If you find any more information, please let us know. Thanks, Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: qui...@li... [mailto:quickfixj- > use...@li...] On Behalf Of Jeronimo Ginzburg > Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 3:42 PM > To: Qui...@li... > Subject: [Quickfixj-users] Working with SSL and non SSL session on 1.1.0 > > QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ > QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/ > Hi, > Is it possible to have an Acceptor with some sessions with SSL and > others without SSL in 1.1.0, in different ports? > I've tried to use the following configuration but both 6001 and 6002 > ports were encrypted: > > [session] > TargetCompID=CLN1 > BeginString=FIX.4.4 > DataDictionary=FIX44.xml > SocketAcceptPort=6002 > SocketUseSSL=Y > [session] > TargetCompID=CLN2 > BeginString=FIX.4.4 > DataDictionary=FIX44.xml > SocketUseSSL=N > SocketAcceptPort=6001 > > Thanks in advance, > Jeronimo |