|
From: Toli K. <to...@ma...> - 2007-04-09 20:36:02
|
Hey all, I have a question about the way you think that UtcTimeStampField should preserve milliseconds. This is related to bug qfj-146: http://www.quickfixj.org/jira/browse/QFJ-146. I'm testing the QFJ-1.1 RC1 candidate, and i noticed that the way i've implemented the fix for the bug makes the milliseconds be created only if it is specified, and the default behaviour is not to preserve milliseconds. I'm starting to think that's incorrect behaviour - and that it may make more sense to *always* preserve milliseconds. So I would make appropriate changes to the UtcTimeStampField. Any other thoughts on this? Is there a particular backwards-compatibility use case where we don't want to make that change? -- Toli Kuznets http://www.marketcetera.com: Open-Source Trading Platform download.run.trade. |