|
From: Vladimir K. <vla...@db...> - 2007-03-05 10:51:14
|
Hi is there anyone who tried to use quickfixj to connect CME? I sent logon message: 8=FIX.4.2 9=83 35=A 34=1 49=XXX123U 52=20070301-12:18:22.505 56=CME 95=3 96=KXX 98=0 108=30 141=Y 10=021 and received logout as a result. 8=FIX.4.2 9=110 35=5 34=413 49=CME 50=G 52=20070301-12:47:32.372 56=XXX123 369=0 58=SenderSubId (50) tag is not present 789=1 10=063 as you can see SenderCompID in logon message and TargetCompID in logout message differs and this fact causes validation failure in quckfixj code. does CME breaks FIX protocol or quickfixj is too strict? _________________________________ Vladimir Kvasov --- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. |