Re: [Quickfixj-users] Patches to spec XML

[Graham M. <gm...@ma...>]

Sorry, that message sent before I was done...

As I was saying, the last chunk of the patch shows a difference in the names
of a couple of values between QuickFIX and QuickFIX/J.  Not sure what the
right thing to do about that is.

graham

On 3/2/07, Graham Miller <gm...@ma...> wrote:
>
> Just this morning, Oren patched the FIX4[0-2].xml specification files
> (thanks Oren!), in order to include the correct enumerations for the MsgType
> field. (The corresponding QuickFIX bug is here
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/bugtracker/bug.php?op=show&bugid=214 ).  I
> have attached the diff of the new QuickFIX spec files against the HEAD
> revision of the QuickFIX/J files, and it seems like the QuickFIX/J spec
> files should be patched, too. (I have attached the patch).
>
> There is one interesting thing though: the last chunk in the patch is
> this:
>  2202,2203c2155,2156
> <       <value enum="0" description="FX_NETTING"/>
> <       <value enum="1" description="FX_SWAP"/>
> ---
> >       <value enum="0" description="F_X_NETTING"/>
> >       <value enum="1" description="F_X_SWAP"/>
>
>
> --
> Marketcetera Trading Platform
> download.run.trade.
> www.marketcetera.org




-- 
Marketcetera Trading Platform
download.run.trade.
www.marketcetera.org