Re: [Quickfixj-users] [Fwd: quickfixj-users]

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

It is in fact legal to send a logon message with the reset field set  
to Y at anytime.

--oren

On Feb 26, 2007, at 7:40 AM, Steve Bate wrote:

> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
> Hi Dasun,
>
> This sounds like nonstandard FIX behavior on the part of the exchange.
> Is this an encrypted session that needs some form of multistage logon
> negotiation (which QuickFIX(/J) does not support)? If not, I don't  
> know
> why the exchange would be sending a second logon acknowledgement or  
> why
> they'd expect the initiator to respond to it. Which exchange is this?
>
> Steve
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: qui...@li...  
>> [mailto:quickfixj-
>> use...@li...] On Behalf Of da...@mu...
>> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:29 AM
>> To: qui...@li...
>> Subject: [Quickfixj-users] [Fwd: quickfixj-users]
>>
>> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
>> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>> I have a senario whcih I am faced with an exchnage. I send the login
>> request (35=A) and I get the response(35=A) back as usual. Then  
>> just after
>> that response I get another message (35=A) with 141=Y. My quick fix
>> doesn't send a reply to that. (According to exchnage I need to send
>> another 35=A with 141=Y). and then after some time exchnage logout  
>> from
>> the session.
>>
>> How can I do this in QuickFIX/J (I am on v1.0)
>> will upgrading to 1.0.5 solve this issue?
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> Dasun Perera