Re: [Quickfixj-users] [Fwd: quickfixj-users]

[Steve B. <st...@te...>]

Hi Dasun,

This sounds like nonstandard FIX behavior on the part of the exchange.
Is this an encrypted session that needs some form of multistage logon
negotiation (which QuickFIX(/J) does not support)? If not, I don't know 
why the exchange would be sending a second logon acknowledgement or why
they'd expect the initiator to respond to it. Which exchange is this? 

Steve


> -----Original Message-----
> From: qui...@li... [mailto:quickfixj-
> use...@li...] On Behalf Of da...@mu...
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:29 AM
> To: qui...@li...
> Subject: [Quickfixj-users] [Fwd: quickfixj-users]
> 
> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
> 
> 
> Hi,
> I have a senario whcih I am faced with an exchnage. I send the login
> request (35=A) and I get the response(35=A) back as usual. Then just after
> that response I get another message (35=A) with 141=Y. My quick fix
> doesn't send a reply to that. (According to exchnage I need to send
> another 35=A with 141=Y). and then after some time exchnage logout from
> the session.
> 
> How can I do this in QuickFIX/J (I am on v1.0)
> will upgrading to 1.0.5 solve this issue?
> 
> best regards,
> 
> Dasun Perera