quickfix-users

[Quickfix-users] Issue on message.get

[Francesco P. <fpi...@gm...>]

Hi everybody,
first of all, thank you for your great job.
I'm using quickfix to build a simple application and I'm experiencing this
issue:

when an execution report arrives, I crack the message and I do this: *

FIX::LastQty aLastQty;
message.get(**aLastQty);

*if this field is not in the message, I receive this exception:
Conditionally Required Field Missing (32).
How can I avoid this? Can I test in any way the result of get method?

Hope I was clear, thank you for your attention.
Francesco

Re: [Quickfix-users] Issue on message.get

[Malinka R. <ael...@gm...>]

you can either read the other message fields to test if it should have a
last quantity (better) or you can try catch it like so

try
{
*message.get(**aLastQty);*
}
catch(FieldNotFound)
{
}

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Francesco Pispola <fpi...@gm...>
wrote:

> QuickFIX Documentation:
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>
> Hi everybody,
> first of all, thank you for your great job.
> I'm using quickfix to build a simple application and I'm experiencing this
> issue:
>
> when an execution report arrives, I crack the message and I do this: *
>
> FIX::LastQty aLastQty;
> message.get(**aLastQty);
>
> *if this field is not in the message, I receive this exception:
> Conditionally Required Field Missing (32).
> How can I avoid this? Can I test in any way the result of get method?
>
> Hope I was clear, thank you for your attention.
> Francesco
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>
>

Re: [Quickfix-users] Issue on message.get

[Jonathan K. <jon...@gm...>]

Here is what I do:

if (message.isSet(aLastQty)) message.get(aLastQty);

Then you can simply check the value of aLastQty.  If you
pre-initialize it to a value you know is invalid, you don't need to
rely on exception handling, which might be more desirable.

Enjoy,

Jonathan

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Francesco Pispola <fpi...@gm...> wrote:
> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
>  QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>
> Hi everybody,
> first of all, thank you for your great job.
> I'm using quickfix to build a simple application and I'm experiencing this issue:
>
> when an execution report arrives, I crack the message and I do this:
>
> FIX::LastQty aLastQty;
> message.get(aLastQty);
>
> if this field is not in the message, I receive this exception: Conditionally Required Field Missing (32).
> How can I avoid this? Can I test in any way the result of get method?
>
> Hope I was clear, thank you for your attention.
> Francesco
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>  Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
>  http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
>  Quickfix-users mailing list
>  Qui...@li...
>  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>
>



-- 
--
Jonathan Kalbfeld
ThoughtWave Technologies LLC
www.thoughtwave.com
+1 424 354 1814