quickfix-users

Re: [Quickfix-users] [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......

[Shepheard, T. \(London\) <Tob...@ml...>]

I can't help you with the benchmarking as I've not done this, but you'd
need to consider whether you're comparing the straight C++ version of
QuickFix, or QuickFix via one of the wrappers (eg JNI). I'd also take
ease of development/support into consideration as well as performance.
=20
We do use QFJ in a production environment, and I've had no problems with
it at all. I should caveat that, as it's not running in a
performance-critical environment and it's under a very light load, but
for our purposes it's been ideal and I've not heard any suggestions that
it can't handle much higher loads. As always you should of course test
for yourself as everybody's environment differs.
=20
Rgds,
Toby

	-----Original Message-----
	From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
Eranga Samararathna
	Sent: 05 September 2006 05:05
	To: qui...@li...;
qui...@li...
	Subject: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......
=09
=09

	Hi,

	=20

	Is any one bench mark the QuickFix vs QuickFix/j? How is the
performance difference of these two systems?=20

	Are there any organizations use QuickFix/ j for their production
systems?=20

	=20

	=20

	BR,

	=20

	Eranga
--------------------------------------------------------

If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the =
sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, =
retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms =
relating to this e-mail.     http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
--------------------------------------------------------

Re: [Quickfix-users] [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......

[VP M. IT A. E. T. <ass...@gm...>]

We have been using Quickfix/J (in production 2 counter parties) for well
over 1 year now.
We had used Quickfix Classic with JNI and moved over to pure Java. No major
side effect
or performance degradtion.

The env. is linux/jboss/jmx. You can search to get some preliminary
distribution posted
to this newsgroup.

cheers
--
rk



On 9/5/06, Eranga Samararathna <pe...@ri...> wrote:
>
> QuickFIX Documentation:
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>
>
>
>  Hi,
>
>
>
> Is any one bench mark the QuickFix vs QuickFix/j? How is the performance
> difference of these two systems?
>
> Are there any organizations use QuickFix/ j for their production systems?
>
>
>
>
>
> BR,
>
>
>
> Eranga
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>
>

Re: [Quickfix-users] [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......

[Eranga S. <pe...@ri...>]

Thanks Toby.

 

We are going to use QuickFix or QuckFix on some performance critical
application. Currently we use Quickfix via JNI wrapper. 

 

BR,

 

Eranga

 

  _____  

From: Shepheard, Toby (London) [mailto:Tob...@ml...] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 12:23 PM
To: Eranga Samararathna; qui...@li...
Subject: RE: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......

 

I can't help you with the benchmarking as I've not done this, but you'd need
to consider whether you're comparing the straight C++ version of QuickFix,
or QuickFix via one of the wrappers (eg JNI). I'd also take ease of
development/support into consideration as well as performance.

 

We do use QFJ in a production environment, and I've had no problems with it
at all. I should caveat that, as it's not running in a performance-critical
environment and it's under a very light load, but for our purposes it's been
ideal and I've not heard any suggestions that it can't handle much higher
loads. As always you should of course test for yourself as everybody's
environment differs.

 

Rgds,

Toby

-----Original Message-----
From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
Eranga Samararathna
Sent: 05 September 2006 05:05
To: qui...@li...;
qui...@li...
Subject: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......

Hi,

 

Is any one bench mark the QuickFix vs QuickFix/j? How is the performance
difference of these two systems? 

Are there any organizations use QuickFix/ j for their production systems? 

 

 

BR,

 

Eranga

  _____  

If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the
sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain
or redistribute it. Click here  <http://www.ml.com/email_terms/> for
important additional terms relating to this e-mail.
http://www.ml.com/email_terms/

  _____