quickfix-users

Re: [Quickfix-users] ValidateUserDefinedFields=N doesn't work in the [DEFAULT] Section Of a settings file in Quickfix 1.13.2

[<or...@qu...>]

Yeah, I posted a patch that fixes this earlier today, but neglected to
do a reply to all so the whole whole mailing lists gets it.  If you
apply these two patches it should resolve the problem.

http://quickfix.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/quickfix/trunk/quickfix/src/C%2B%2B/SessionFactory.h?r1=2072&r2=2218&view=patch
http://quickfix.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/quickfix/trunk/quickfix/src/C%2B%2B/SessionFactory.cpp?r1=2089&r2=2218&view=patch

--oren

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] ValidateUserDefinedFields=N doesn't work
> in the [DEFAULT] Section Of a settings file in Quickfix 1.13.2
> From: Francis Gingras <fr...@at...>
> Date: Fri, March 26, 2010 5:25 pm
> To: Oren Miller <or...@qu...>
> Cc: qui...@li...
> <qui...@li...>
> 
> 
> Here is a message I posted earlier in the day. It does not seem to have been accepted by SF so here it is again.  I use the latest QF VS9 1.13.2 initiator.
> 
> I have used QF initiators for years and it works splendidly. I am now trying to connect to a provider that has undocumented custom tags (which are not in the dictionary). I have these lines in the [DEFAULT] section of the config file: 
> 
> UseDataDictionary=Y
> DataDictionary=FIX44.xml
> ValidateUserDefinedFields=N
> 
> But I still get Rejects with "Invalid tag number" for all user-defined tags that are not in the DataDictionary. Shouldn't they be ignored by QF?
> 
> 
> OUT: Reject 
> 8=FIX.4.4
> 9=107
> 35=3
> 34=5
> 49=DEMO
> 52=20100326-16:04:24.405
> 56=XYZ
> 45=3
> 58=Invalid tag number
> 371=10402
> 372=BG
> 373=0
> 10=175
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Francis Gingras

Re: [Quickfix-users] ValidateUserDefinedFields=N doesn't work in the [DEFAULT] Section Of a settings file in Quickfix 1.13.2

[Sev Z. <se...@gm...>]

I raised this issue originally.  I've confirmed it is fixed in Release 
1.13.3.

or...@qu... wrote:
> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
> Yeah, I posted a patch that fixes this earlier today, but neglected to
> do a reply to all so the whole whole mailing lists gets it.  If you
> apply these two patches it should resolve the problem.
>
> http://quickfix.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/quickfix/trunk/quickfix/src/C%2B%2B/SessionFactory.h?r1=2072&r2=2218&view=patch
> http://quickfix.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/quickfix/trunk/quickfix/src/C%2B%2B/SessionFactory.cpp?r1=2089&r2=2218&view=patch
>
> --oren
>
>   
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] ValidateUserDefinedFields=N doesn't work
>> in the [DEFAULT] Section Of a settings file in Quickfix 1.13.2
>> From: Francis Gingras <fr...@at...>
>> Date: Fri, March 26, 2010 5:25 pm
>> To: Oren Miller <or...@qu...>
>> Cc: qui...@li...
>> <qui...@li...>
>>
>>
>> Here is a message I posted earlier in the day. It does not seem to have been accepted by SF so here it is again.  I use the latest QF VS9 1.13.2 initiator.
>>
>> I have used QF initiators for years and it works splendidly. I am now trying to connect to a provider that has undocumented custom tags (which are not in the dictionary). I have these lines in the [DEFAULT] section of the config file: 
>>
>> UseDataDictionary=Y
>> DataDictionary=FIX44.xml
>> ValidateUserDefinedFields=N
>>
>> But I still get Rejects with "Invalid tag number" for all user-defined tags that are not in the DataDictionary. Shouldn't they be ignored by QF?
>>
>>
>> OUT: Reject 
>> 8=FIX.4.4
>> 9=107
>> 35=3
>> 34=5
>> 49=DEMO
>> 52=20100326-16:04:24.405
>> 56=XYZ
>> 45=3
>> 58=Invalid tag number
>> 371=10402
>> 372=BG
>> 373=0
>> 10=175
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Francis Gingras
>>     
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>