quickfix-users — QuickFIX user support

Re: [Quickfix-users] Acceptance test problems

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

Yes.  Our vc6 build machine is showing the same results: =20
http://www.quickfixengine.org/autobuild-i386-msvcrt-vc6.html, although =20=

the vc7 build is fine: =20
http://www.quickfixengine.org/autobuild-i386-msvcrt-vc6.html

We'll investigate this.

--oren

On Sep 22, 2004, at 8:10 AM, Joshua Jacobson wrote:

> I ran the unit test with no errors. When running the acceptance tests =20=

> I got 15 errors. I=A0wasn't expecting to get any errors. I'm working =
on =20
> Windows XP with QuickFix 1.92. I compiled using MS VC++ 6.0 with SP 5. =
=20
> Here are the error cases:
> <test name=3D'definitions/server/fix40/20_SimultaneousResendRequest.def'=
 =20
> result=3D'failure' >
> =A0 <message>
> =A0=A0=A0 Value in field (34) should be (3) but was (2)
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.0*9=3D108*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D00000000=20
> -00:00:00*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:=20
> 00*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*10=3D0*]]></expected>=

> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.0*9=3D108*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D20040922=20
> -12:47:18*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:47:=20
> 18*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*10=3D033*]]></receive=
d>
> =A0=A0=A0 <line>23</line>
> =A0 </message>
> </test>
> <test =20
> name=3D'definitions/server/fix40/8_AdminAndApplicationMessages.def' =20=

> result=3D'failure' >
> =A0 <message>
> =A0=A0=A0 Value in field (9) should be (107) but was (108)
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.0*9=3D107*35=3DD*34=3D6*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D00000000=20
> -00:00:00*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:=20
> 00*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DCDG*10=3D0*]]></expected>
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.0*9=3D108*35=3DD*34=3D5*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D20040922=20
> -12:48:12*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:48:=20
> 12*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*10=3D026*]]></receive=
d>
> =A0=A0=A0 <line>39</line>
> =A0 </message>
> </test><test =20
> name=3D'definitions/server/fix40/8_OnlyApplicationMessages.def' =20
> result=3D'failure' >
> =A0 <message>
> =A0=A0=A0 Value in field (9) should be (107) but was (108)
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.0*9=3D107*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D00000000=20
> -00:00:00*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:=20
> 00*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DCDG*10=3D0*]]></expected>
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.0*9=3D108*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D20040922=20
> -12:48:13*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:48:=20
> 13*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*10=3D025*]]></receive=
d>
> =A0=A0=A0 <line>17</line>
> =A0 </message>
> </test>
> <test =20
> name=3D'definitions/server/fix41/8_AdminAndApplicationMessages.def' =20=

> result=3D'failure' >
> =A0 <message>
> =A0=A0=A0 Value in field (9) should be (107) but was (108)
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.1*9=3D107*35=3DD*34=3D6*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D00000000=20
> -00:00:00*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:=20
> 00*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DCDG*10=3D0*]]></expected>
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.1*9=3D108*35=3DD*34=3D5*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D20040922=20
> -12:49:08*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:49:=20
> 08*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*10=3D039*]]></receive=
d>
> =A0=A0=A0 <line>39</line>
> =A0 </message>
> </test>
> <test name=3D'definitions/server/fix41/8_OnlyApplicationMessages.def' =20=

> result=3D'failure' >
> =A0 <message>
> =A0=A0=A0 Value in field (9) should be (107) but was (108)
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.1*9=3D107*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D00000000=20
> -00:00:00*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:=20
> 00*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DCDG*10=3D0*]]></expected>
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.1*9=3D108*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D20040922=20
> -12:49:09*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:49:=20
> 09*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*10=3D038*]]></receive=
d>
> =A0=A0=A0 <line>17</line>
> =A0 </message>
> </test>
> <test name=3D'definitions/server/fix42/20_SimultaneousResendRequest.def'=
 =20
> result=3D'failure' >
> =A0 <message>
> =A0=A0=A0 Value in field (34) should be (3) but was (2)
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.2*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D00000000=20
> -00:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:=20
> 00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*60=3D00000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*=
]]></=20
> expected>
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.2*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D20040922=20
> -12:49:13.113*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:49:=20
> 13*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*60=3D20040922-12:49:13*10=3D17=
8*]]></=20
> received>
> =A0=A0=A0 <line>23</line>
> =A0 </message>
> </test>
> <test =20
> name=3D'definitions/server/fix42/8_AdminAndApplicationMessages.def' =20=

> result=3D'failure' >
> =A0 <message>
> =A0=A0=A0 Value in field (9) should be (125) but was (126)
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.2*9=3D125*35=3DD*34=3D6*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D00000000=20
> -00:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:=20
> 00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DCDG*60=3D00000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*]=
]></=20
> expected>
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.2*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D5*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D20040922=20
> -12:50:07.101*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:50:=20
> 07*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*60=3D20040922-12:50:07*10=3D16=
3*]]></=20
> received>
> =A0=A0=A0 <line>39</line>
> =A0 </message>
> </test>
> <test name=3D'definitions/server/fix42/8_OnlyApplicationMessages.def' =20=

> result=3D'failure' >
> =A0 <message>
> =A0=A0=A0 Value in field (9) should be (125) but was (126)
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.2*9=3D125*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D00000000=20
> -00:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:=20
> 00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DCDG*60=3D00000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*]=
]></=20
> expected>
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.2*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D20040922=20
> -12:50:07.381*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:50:=20
> 07*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*60=3D20040922-12:50:07*10=3D17=
0*]]></=20
> received>
> =A0=A0=A0 <line>17</line>
> =A0 </message>
> </test>
> <test name=3D'definitions/server/fix43/20_SimultaneousResendRequest.def'=
 =20
> result=3D'failure' >
> =A0 <message>
> =A0=A0=A0 Value in field (34) should be (3) but was (2)
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.3*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D00000000=20
> -00:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:=20
> 00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*60=3D00000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*=
]]></=20
> expected>
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.3*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D20040922=20
> -12:50:11.246*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:50:=20
> 11*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*60=3D20040922-12:50:11*10=3D15=
6*]]></=20
> received>
> =A0=A0=A0 <line>23</line>
> =A0 </message>
> </test>
> <test =20
> name=3D'definitions/server/fix43/8_AdminAndApplicationMessages.def' =20=

> result=3D'failure' >
> =A0 <message>
> =A0=A0=A0 Value in field (9) should be (125) but was (126)
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.3*9=3D125*35=3DD*34=3D6*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D00000000=20
> -00:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:=20
> 00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DCDG*60=3D00000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*]=
]></=20
> expected>
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.3*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D5*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D20040922=20
> -12:51:05.234*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:51:=20
> 05*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*60=3D20040922-12:51:05*10=3D16=
8*]]></=20
> received>
> =A0=A0=A0 <line>39</line>
> =A0 </message>
> </test>
> <test name=3D'definitions/server/fix43/8_OnlyApplicationMessages.def' =20=

> result=3D'failure' >
> =A0 <message>
> =A0=A0=A0 Value in field (9) should be (125) but was (126)
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.3*9=3D125*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D00000000=20
> -00:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:=20
> 00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DCDG*60=3D00000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*]=
]></=20
> expected>
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.3*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D20040922=20
> -12:51:05.514*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:51:=20
> 05*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*60=3D20040922-12:51:05*10=3D16=
6*]]></=20
> received>
> =A0=A0=A0 <line>17</line>
> =A0 </message>
> </test>
> <test name=3D'definitions/server/fix44/20_SimultaneousResendRequest.def'=
 =20
> result=3D'failure' >
> =A0 <message>
> =A0=A0=A0 Value in field (34) should be (3) but was (2)
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.4*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D00000000=20
> -00:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:=20
> 00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*60=3D00000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*=
]]></=20
> expected>
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.4*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D20040922=20
> -12:51:09.460*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:51:=20
> 09*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*60=3D20040922-12:51:09*10=3D17=
9*]]></=20
> received>
> =A0=A0=A0 <line>23</line>
> =A0 </message>
> </test>
> <test =20
> name=3D'definitions/server/fix44/8_AdminAndApplicationMessages.def' =20=

> result=3D'failure' >
> =A0 <message>
> =A0=A0=A0 Value in field (9) should be (125) but was (126)
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.4*9=3D125*35=3DD*34=3D6*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D00000000=20
> -00:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:=20
> 00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DCDG*60=3D00000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*]=
]></=20
> expected>
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.4*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D5*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D20040922=20
> -12:52:01.434*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:52:=20
> 01*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*60=3D20040922-12:52:01*10=3D16=
2*]]></=20
> received>
> =A0=A0=A0 <line>39</line>
> =A0 </message>
> </test>
> <test name=3D'definitions/server/fix44/8_OnlyApplicationMessages.def' =20=

> result=3D'failure' >
> =A0 <message>
> =A0=A0=A0 Value in field (9) should be (125) but was (126)
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.4*9=3D125*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D00000000=20
> -00:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:=20
> 00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DCDG*60=3D00000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*]=
]></=20
> expected>
> =A0=A0=A0 =20
> <received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.4*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=
=3D20040922=20
> -12:52:01.705*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:52:=20
> 01*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*55=3DINTC*60=3D20040922-12:52:01*10=3D16=
0*]]></=20
> received>
> =A0=A0=A0 <line>17</line>
> =A0 </message>
> </test>
> =A0
> =A0
> I did a batch compile and got several warnings but not no errors. Here =
=20
> are the warnings:
> C:\temp\quickfix\src\C++\SessionFactory.cpp(101) : warning C4101: 'e' =20=

> : unreferenced local variable
> C:\temp\quickfix\src\C++\SessionTime.cpp(153) : warning C4243: type =20=

> cast conversion from 'const class FIX::UtcTimeStamp *' to 'struct tm =20=

> *' exists, but is inaccessible
> C:\temp\quickfix\src\C++\SessionTime.cpp(154) : warning C4243: type =20=

> cast conversion from 'const class FIX::UtcTimeStamp *' to 'struct tm =20=

> *' exists, but is inaccessible
> LINK : warning LNK4089: all references to "WS2_32.dll" discarded by =20=

> /OPT:REF

[Quickfix-users] Acceptance test problems

[Joshua J. <Jo...@Fx...>]

I ran the unit test with no errors. When running the acceptance tests I
got 15 errors. I wasn't expecting to get any errors. I'm working on
Windows XP with QuickFix 1.92. I compiled using MS VC++ 6.0 with SP 5.
Here are the error cases:
<test name=3D'definitions/server/fix40/20_SimultaneousResendRequest.def'
result=3D'failure' >
  <message>
    Value in field (34) should be (3) but was (2)
=20
<expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.0*9=3D108*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
00000000-00
:00:00*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:00*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D=
1*55=3DINTC*1
0=3D0*]]></expected>
=20
<received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.0*9=3D108*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
20040922-12
:47:18*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:47:18*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D=
1*55=3DINTC*1
0=3D033*]]></received>
    <line>23</line>
  </message>
</test>
<test =
name=3D'definitions/server/fix40/8_AdminAndApplicationMessages.def'
result=3D'failure' >
  <message>
    Value in field (9) should be (107) but was (108)
=20
<expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.0*9=3D107*35=3DD*34=3D6*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
00000000-00
:00:00*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:00*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D=
1*55=3DCDG*10
=3D0*]]></expected>
=20
<received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.0*9=3D108*35=3DD*34=3D5*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
20040922-12
:48:12*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:48:12*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D=
1*55=3DINTC*1
0=3D026*]]></received>
    <line>39</line>
  </message>
</test><test
name=3D'definitions/server/fix40/8_OnlyApplicationMessages.def'
result=3D'failure' >
  <message>
    Value in field (9) should be (107) but was (108)
=20
<expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.0*9=3D107*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
00000000-00
:00:00*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:00*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D=
1*55=3DCDG*10
=3D0*]]></expected>
=20
<received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.0*9=3D108*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
20040922-12
:48:13*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:48:13*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D=
1*55=3DINTC*1
0=3D025*]]></received>
    <line>17</line>
  </message>
</test>
<test =
name=3D'definitions/server/fix41/8_AdminAndApplicationMessages.def'
result=3D'failure' >
  <message>
    Value in field (9) should be (107) but was (108)
=20
<expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.1*9=3D107*35=3DD*34=3D6*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
00000000-00
:00:00*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:00*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D=
1*55=3DCDG*10
=3D0*]]></expected>
=20
<received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.1*9=3D108*35=3DD*34=3D5*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
20040922-12
:49:08*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:49:08*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D=
1*55=3DINTC*1
0=3D039*]]></received>
    <line>39</line>
  </message>
</test>
<test name=3D'definitions/server/fix41/8_OnlyApplicationMessages.def'
result=3D'failure' >
  <message>
    Value in field (9) should be (107) but was (108)
=20
<expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.1*9=3D107*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
00000000-00
:00:00*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:00*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D=
1*55=3DCDG*10
=3D0*]]></expected>
=20
<received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.1*9=3D108*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
20040922-12
:49:09*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:49:09*11=3DID*21=3D3*38=3D100*40=3D1*54=3D=
1*55=3DINTC*1
0=3D038*]]></received>
    <line>17</line>
  </message>
</test>
<test name=3D'definitions/server/fix42/20_SimultaneousResendRequest.def'
result=3D'failure' >
  <message>
    Value in field (34) should be (3) but was (2)
=20
<expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.2*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
00000000-00
:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DINTC*60=3D0
0000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*]]></expected>
=20
<received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.2*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
20040922-12
:49:13.113*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:49:13*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DINTC*60=3D2
0040922-12:49:13*10=3D178*]]></received>
    <line>23</line>
  </message>
</test>
<test =
name=3D'definitions/server/fix42/8_AdminAndApplicationMessages.def'
result=3D'failure' >
  <message>
    Value in field (9) should be (125) but was (126)
=20
<expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.2*9=3D125*35=3DD*34=3D6*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
00000000-00
:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DCDG*60=3D00
000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*]]></expected>
=20
<received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.2*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D5*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
20040922-12
:50:07.101*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:50:07*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DINTC*60=3D2
0040922-12:50:07*10=3D163*]]></received>
    <line>39</line>
  </message>
</test>
<test name=3D'definitions/server/fix42/8_OnlyApplicationMessages.def'
result=3D'failure' >
  <message>
    Value in field (9) should be (125) but was (126)
=20
<expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.2*9=3D125*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
00000000-00
:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DCDG*60=3D00
000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*]]></expected>
=20
<received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.2*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
20040922-12
:50:07.381*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:50:07*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DINTC*60=3D2
0040922-12:50:07*10=3D170*]]></received>
    <line>17</line>
  </message>
</test>
<test name=3D'definitions/server/fix43/20_SimultaneousResendRequest.def'
result=3D'failure' >
  <message>
    Value in field (34) should be (3) but was (2)
=20
<expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.3*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
00000000-00
:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DINTC*60=3D0
0000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*]]></expected>
=20
<received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.3*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
20040922-12
:50:11.246*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:50:11*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DINTC*60=3D2
0040922-12:50:11*10=3D156*]]></received>
    <line>23</line>
  </message>
</test>
<test =
name=3D'definitions/server/fix43/8_AdminAndApplicationMessages.def'
result=3D'failure' >
  <message>
    Value in field (9) should be (125) but was (126)
=20
<expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.3*9=3D125*35=3DD*34=3D6*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
00000000-00
:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DCDG*60=3D00
000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*]]></expected>
=20
<received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.3*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D5*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
20040922-12
:51:05.234*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:51:05*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DINTC*60=3D2
0040922-12:51:05*10=3D168*]]></received>
    <line>39</line>
  </message>
</test>
<test name=3D'definitions/server/fix43/8_OnlyApplicationMessages.def'
result=3D'failure' >
  <message>
    Value in field (9) should be (125) but was (126)
=20
<expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.3*9=3D125*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
00000000-00
:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DCDG*60=3D00
000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*]]></expected>
=20
<received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.3*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
20040922-12
:51:05.514*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:51:05*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DINTC*60=3D2
0040922-12:51:05*10=3D166*]]></received>
    <line>17</line>
  </message>
</test>
<test name=3D'definitions/server/fix44/20_SimultaneousResendRequest.def'
result=3D'failure' >
  <message>
    Value in field (34) should be (3) but was (2)
=20
<expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.4*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
00000000-00
:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DINTC*60=3D0
0000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*]]></expected>
=20
<received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.4*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
20040922-12
:51:09.460*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:51:09*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DINTC*60=3D2
0040922-12:51:09*10=3D179*]]></received>
    <line>23</line>
  </message>
</test>
<test =
name=3D'definitions/server/fix44/8_AdminAndApplicationMessages.def'
result=3D'failure' >
  <message>
    Value in field (9) should be (125) but was (126)
=20
<expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.4*9=3D125*35=3DD*34=3D6*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
00000000-00
:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DCDG*60=3D00
000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*]]></expected>
=20
<received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.4*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D5*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
20040922-12
:52:01.434*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:52:01*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DINTC*60=3D2
0040922-12:52:01*10=3D162*]]></received>
    <line>39</line>
  </message>
</test>
<test name=3D'definitions/server/fix44/8_OnlyApplicationMessages.def'
result=3D'failure' >
  <message>
    Value in field (9) should be (125) but was (126)
=20
<expected><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.4*9=3D125*35=3DD*34=3D3*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
00000000-00
:00:00.000*56=3DTW*122=3D00000000-00:00:00*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DCDG*60=3D00
000000-00:00:00*10=3D0*]]></expected>
=20
<received><![CDATA[8=3DFIX.4.4*9=3D126*35=3DD*34=3D2*43=3DY*49=3DISLD*52=3D=
20040922-12
:52:01.705*56=3DTW*122=3D20040922-12:52:01*11=3DID*21=3D3*40=3D1*54=3D1*5=
5=3DINTC*60=3D2
0040922-12:52:01*10=3D160*]]></received>
    <line>17</line>
  </message>
</test>

=20
=20
I did a batch compile and got several warnings but not no errors. Here
are the warnings:
C:\temp\quickfix\src\C++\SessionFactory.cpp(101) : warning C4101: 'e' :
unreferenced local variable
C:\temp\quickfix\src\C++\SessionTime.cpp(153) : warning C4243: type cast
conversion from 'const class FIX::UtcTimeStamp *' to 'struct tm *'
exists, but is inaccessible
C:\temp\quickfix\src\C++\SessionTime.cpp(154) : warning C4243: type cast
conversion from 'const class FIX::UtcTimeStamp *' to 'struct tm *'
exists, but is inaccessible
LINK : warning LNK4089: all references to "WS2_32.dll" discarded by
/OPT:REF

[Quickfix-users] RE: [Quickfix-developers] tag 141

[Gururaj K. <gkr...@ba...>]

I believe you will manually reset the sequence numbers for the session
(based on your counter party) and incorporate 141=Y
in the "toAdmin" function (assuming you are the initiator).

-----Original Message-----
From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
Shamanth
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 6:04 AM
To: qui...@li...
Cc: qui...@li...
Subject: [Quickfix-developers] tag 141



Hi 

We are using quickfix 1.8, we had one query related to tag 141 

We are sending the tag 141 = Y with logon message. 
Should we manually reset the sequence number and then send a logon
message with tag 141 set to "Y" or does quickfix automatically reset the
sequence numbers.

I noticed that quickfix does not reset the sequence numbers, so I am
assuming that we need to do this manually. 
with regards 
R Shamanth 

	 -----Original Message----- 
From:   Shamanth  
Sent:   Thursday, September 16, 2004 3:43 PM 
To:     'qui...@li...' 
Cc:     'qui...@li...' 
Subject:        Session Problem 

	Hi 

	We have a provider, whose Session starts at "22:30:00" GMT and
stops at "21:00:00"GMT, but the provider resets the sequence numbers
only at "00:00:00" GMT. 

	So we have set our StartTime and EndTime at 00:00:00, so that
the sequence numbers get reset at that time. 

	But the problem is that, our quickfix instance will keep sending
Logon requests to the Provider between "21:00:00GMT" to "22:30:00GMT",
i.e. when the provider is down. We want to avoid this.

	Can anyone suggest a solution for this. 

	thanks 
R Shamanth 

[Quickfix-users] tag 141

[Shamanth <sha...@in...>]

Hi

We are using quickfix 1.8, we had one query related to tag 141

We are sending the tag 141 =3D Y with logon message.
Should we manually reset the sequence number and then send a logon =
message with tag 141 set to "Y" or does quickfix automatically reset the =
sequence numbers.

I noticed that quickfix does not reset the sequence numbers, so I am =
assuming that we need to do this manually.
with regards
R Shamanth

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Shamanth =20
> Sent:	Thursday, September 16, 2004 3:43 PM
> To:	'qui...@li...'
> Cc:	'qui...@li...'
> Subject:	Session Problem
>=20
> Hi
>=20
> We have a provider, whose Session starts at "22:30:00" GMT and stops =
at "21:00:00"GMT, but the provider resets the sequence numbers only at =
"00:00:00" GMT.=20
> So we have set our StartTime and EndTime at 00:00:00, so that the =
sequence numbers get reset at that time.=20
>=20
> But the problem is that, our quickfix instance will keep sending Logon =
requests to the Provider between "21:00:00GMT" to "22:30:00GMT", i.e. =
when the provider is down. We want to avoid this.
>=20
> Can anyone suggest a solution for this.
>=20
> thanks
> R Shamanth

[Quickfix-users] Re: [Quickfix-developers] Session Problem

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

Call Session::logout to fully disable the session, and Session::logon 
when you want to reactivate it.  In the future we are looking at was to 
specify multiple time ranges for a day from the configuration file.

--oren

On Sep 16, 2004, at 5:12 AM, Shamanth wrote:

> Hi
>
> We have a provider, whose Session starts at "22:30:00" GMT and stops 
> at "21:00:00"GMT, but the provider resets the sequence numbers only at 
> "00:00:00" GMT.
>
>  So we have set our StartTime and EndTime at 00:00:00, so that the 
> sequence numbers get reset at that time.
>
>  But the problem is that, our quickfix instance will keep sending 
> Logon requests to the Provider between "21:00:00GMT" to "22:30:00GMT", 
> i.e. when the provider is down. We want to avoid this.
>
> Can anyone suggest a solution for this.
>
> thanks
>  R Shamanth

[Quickfix-users] Session Problem

[Shamanth <sha...@in...>]

Hi

We have a provider, whose Session starts at "22:30:00" GMT and stops at =
"21:00:00"GMT, but the provider resets the sequence numbers only at =
"00:00:00" GMT.=20
So we have set our StartTime and EndTime at 00:00:00, so that the =
sequence numbers get reset at that time.=20

But the problem is that, our quickfix instance will keep sending Logon =
requests to the Provider between "21:00:00GMT" to "22:30:00GMT", i.e. =
when the provider is down. We want to avoid this.

Can anyone suggest a solution for this.

thanks
R Shamanth

[Quickfix-users] QuickFix 1.9.2: successful unit/acceptance tests on Solaris 5.8

[Hans B. <han...@ma...>]

FYI: I had to install these packages to run the tests on SunOS 5.8:
  zlib-1.2.1-sol8-sparc-local
  libiconv-1.8-sol8-sparc-local
  libxml2-2.6.4-sol8-sparc-local
  libtool-1.5-sol8-sparc-local
  ruby-1.8.1-sol8-sparc-local
  rubyunit-0.5.6.tar.gz
  gcc-3.4.1-sol8-sparc-local

All -local packages downloaded from http://www.sunfreeware.com/

I've run the unit and acceptance tests for C++ and Java without
failures.(runut, runat, runut_java, runat_java)  

Configuration: './configure' without parameters (GNU Autoconf 2.57)


OS version:

[hans@test2 test]$ uname -a
SunOS test2 5.8 Generic_108528-12 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraAX-i2


JDK version: "1.3.1_07"
(I also have Java 1.4.2_03, but this was not used in the test)

Hans Bausewein

Re: [Quickfix-developers] Re: [Quickfix-users] QuickFIX 1.9.1 Available

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

I put up a 1.9.2 version for unix on the download page: 
http://www.quickfixengine.org/download.html

--oren

On Sep 15, 2004, at 6:23 AM, Hans Bausewein wrote:

> QuickFIX Documentation: 
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX FAQ: 
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/wikifix/index.php?QuickFixFAQ
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
> On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 13:12, Joerg Thoennes wrote:
>> Hans Bausewein wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 12:30, Hans Bausewein wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I get a linker problem:
>>>>
>>>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
>>>> /home/hans/src/quickfix/src/java/.libs/libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0:
>>>> /home/hans/src/quickfix/src/C++/.libs/libquickfix.so.3: undefined
>>>> symbol: _ZNKSt11logic_error4whatEv
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I also get many libraries with different version numbers:
>>>> libquickfix_jni.la        libquickfix_jni.so.8      libquickfix.so.3
>>>> libquickfix_jni.so        libquickfix_jni.so.8.0.0  
>>>> libquickfix.so.3.1.0
>>>> libquickfix_jni.so.7      libquickfix.la            libquickfix.so.4
>>>> libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0  libquickfix.so            
>>>> libquickfix.so.4.0.0
>>>>
>>>> The 1.9.1 libraries are libquickfix.so.3.1.0 and
>>>> libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0, while the 1.9.0 libraries had newer 
>>>> version
>>>> numbers: libquickfix.so.4.0.0 and libquickfix_jni.so.8.0.0 .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll try to delete the 1.9.0 libraries and recompile.
>>>>
>>>> OS = RedHat Linux 8.0 (kernel 2.4.20)
>>
>> Which GCC version do you use?
>>
>
> "gcc --version" returns:
> gcc (GCC) 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-24)
>
> "rpm -qv gcc" returns "gcc-3.2.3-24"
>
>
> 1.9.0 worked fine (both the Java banzai app and the unit and acceptance
> tests).
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: thawte's Crypto Challenge Vl
> Crack the code and win a Sony DCRHC40 MiniDV Digital Handycam
> Camcorder. More prizes in the weekly Lunch Hour Challenge.
> Sign up NOW http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;10740251;10262165;m
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>

Re: [Quickfix-users] QuickFIX 1.9.1 Available

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

Indeed.  The versions were incorrectly incremented in autotools causing 
it to believe it is backwards compatible which is why the versions were 
knocked back.  I'll fix this and repackage.

--oren

On Sep 15, 2004, at 6:23 AM, Hans Bausewein wrote:

> QuickFIX Documentation: 
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX FAQ: 
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/wikifix/index.php?QuickFixFAQ
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
> On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 13:12, Joerg Thoennes wrote:
>> Hans Bausewein wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 12:30, Hans Bausewein wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I get a linker problem:
>>>>
>>>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
>>>> /home/hans/src/quickfix/src/java/.libs/libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0:
>>>> /home/hans/src/quickfix/src/C++/.libs/libquickfix.so.3: undefined
>>>> symbol: _ZNKSt11logic_error4whatEv
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I also get many libraries with different version numbers:
>>>> libquickfix_jni.la        libquickfix_jni.so.8      libquickfix.so.3
>>>> libquickfix_jni.so        libquickfix_jni.so.8.0.0  
>>>> libquickfix.so.3.1.0
>>>> libquickfix_jni.so.7      libquickfix.la            libquickfix.so.4
>>>> libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0  libquickfix.so            
>>>> libquickfix.so.4.0.0
>>>>
>>>> The 1.9.1 libraries are libquickfix.so.3.1.0 and
>>>> libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0, while the 1.9.0 libraries had newer 
>>>> version
>>>> numbers: libquickfix.so.4.0.0 and libquickfix_jni.so.8.0.0 .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll try to delete the 1.9.0 libraries and recompile.
>>>>
>>>> OS = RedHat Linux 8.0 (kernel 2.4.20)
>>
>> Which GCC version do you use?
>>
>
> "gcc --version" returns:
> gcc (GCC) 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-24)
>
> "rpm -qv gcc" returns "gcc-3.2.3-24"
>
>
> 1.9.0 worked fine (both the Java banzai app and the unit and acceptance
> tests).
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: thawte's Crypto Challenge Vl
> Crack the code and win a Sony DCRHC40 MiniDV Digital Handycam
> Camcorder. More prizes in the weekly Lunch Hour Challenge.
> Sign up NOW http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;10740251;10262165;m
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>

Re: [Quickfix-developers] Re: [Quickfix-users] QuickFIX 1.9.1 Available

[Hans B. <han...@ma...>]

On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 13:12, Joerg Thoennes wrote:
> Hans Bausewein wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 12:30, Hans Bausewein wrote:
> >>
> >>I get a linker problem:
> >>
> >>Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
> >>/home/hans/src/quickfix/src/java/.libs/libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0:
> >>/home/hans/src/quickfix/src/C++/.libs/libquickfix.so.3: undefined
> >>symbol: _ZNKSt11logic_error4whatEv
> >>
> >>
> >>I also get many libraries with different version numbers:
> >>libquickfix_jni.la        libquickfix_jni.so.8      libquickfix.so.3
> >>libquickfix_jni.so        libquickfix_jni.so.8.0.0  libquickfix.so.3.1.0
> >>libquickfix_jni.so.7      libquickfix.la            libquickfix.so.4
> >>libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0  libquickfix.so            libquickfix.so.4.0.0
> >>
> >>The 1.9.1 libraries are libquickfix.so.3.1.0 and
> >>libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0, while the 1.9.0 libraries had newer version
> >>numbers: libquickfix.so.4.0.0 and libquickfix_jni.so.8.0.0 .
> >>
> >>
> >>I'll try to delete the 1.9.0 libraries and recompile.
> >>
> >>OS = RedHat Linux 8.0 (kernel 2.4.20)
> 
> Which GCC version do you use?
> 

"gcc --version" returns:
gcc (GCC) 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-24)

"rpm -qv gcc" returns "gcc-3.2.3-24"


1.9.0 worked fine (both the Java banzai app and the unit and acceptance
tests). 

Hans

Re: [Quickfix-developers] Re: [Quickfix-users] QuickFIX 1.9.1 Available

[Joerg T. <Joe...@ma...>]

Hans Bausewein wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 12:30, Hans Bausewein wrote:
>>
>>I get a linker problem:
>>
>>Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
>>/home/hans/src/quickfix/src/java/.libs/libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0:
>>/home/hans/src/quickfix/src/C++/.libs/libquickfix.so.3: undefined
>>symbol: _ZNKSt11logic_error4whatEv
>>
>>
>>I also get many libraries with different version numbers:
>>libquickfix_jni.la        libquickfix_jni.so.8      libquickfix.so.3
>>libquickfix_jni.so        libquickfix_jni.so.8.0.0  libquickfix.so.3.1.0
>>libquickfix_jni.so.7      libquickfix.la            libquickfix.so.4
>>libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0  libquickfix.so            libquickfix.so.4.0.0
>>
>>The 1.9.1 libraries are libquickfix.so.3.1.0 and
>>libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0, while the 1.9.0 libraries had newer version
>>numbers: libquickfix.so.4.0.0 and libquickfix_jni.so.8.0.0 .
>>
>>
>>I'll try to delete the 1.9.0 libraries and recompile.
>>
>>OS = RedHat Linux 8.0 (kernel 2.4.20)

Which GCC version do you use?

> This happened when running the "test/runat_java 10005" command.
> 
> bin/run_banzai resulted in a similar error.

Cheers, Jörg

-- 
Joerg Thoennes
                                http://macd.com
Tel.: +49 (0)241 44597-24      Macdonald Associates GmbH
Fax : +49 (0)241 44597-10      Lothringer Str. 52, D-52070 Aachen

Re: [Quickfix-users] QuickFIX 1.9.1 Available

[Hans B. <han...@ma...>]

On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 12:30, Hans Bausewein wrote:
> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX FAQ: http://www.quickfixengine.org/wikifix/index.php?QuickFixFAQ
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
> 
> On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 21:55, Oren Miller wrote:
> > QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> > QuickFIX FAQ: http://www.quickfixengine.org/wikifix/index.php?QuickFixFAQ
> > QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
> > 
> > You know where, but in case you don't:  http://www.quickfixengine.org/
> > 
> > This fixes some problems reported with 1.9.0.  You should get this if 
> > you are using MySQL, STLPort, or currencies.  
> 
> I get a linker problem:
> 
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
> /home/hans/src/quickfix/src/java/.libs/libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0:
> /home/hans/src/quickfix/src/C++/.libs/libquickfix.so.3: undefined
> symbol: _ZNKSt11logic_error4whatEv
> 
> 
> I also get many libraries with different version numbers:
> libquickfix_jni.la        libquickfix_jni.so.8      libquickfix.so.3
> libquickfix_jni.so        libquickfix_jni.so.8.0.0  libquickfix.so.3.1.0
> libquickfix_jni.so.7      libquickfix.la            libquickfix.so.4
> libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0  libquickfix.so            libquickfix.so.4.0.0
> 
> The 1.9.1 libraries are libquickfix.so.3.1.0 and
> libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0, while the 1.9.0 libraries had newer version
> numbers: libquickfix.so.4.0.0 and libquickfix_jni.so.8.0.0 .
> 
> 
> I'll try to delete the 1.9.0 libraries and recompile.
> 
> OS = RedHat Linux 8.0 (kernel 2.4.20)
> 
> Hans

This happened when running the "test/runat_java 10005" command.

bin/run_banzai resulted in a similar error.

Hans

Re: [Quickfix-users] QuickFIX 1.9.1 Available

[Hans B. <han...@ma...>]

On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 21:55, Oren Miller wrote:
> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX FAQ: http://www.quickfixengine.org/wikifix/index.php?QuickFixFAQ
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
> 
> You know where, but in case you don't:  http://www.quickfixengine.org/
> 
> This fixes some problems reported with 1.9.0.  You should get this if 
> you are using MySQL, STLPort, or currencies.  

I get a linker problem:

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
/home/hans/src/quickfix/src/java/.libs/libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0:
/home/hans/src/quickfix/src/C++/.libs/libquickfix.so.3: undefined
symbol: _ZNKSt11logic_error4whatEv


I also get many libraries with different version numbers:
libquickfix_jni.la        libquickfix_jni.so.8      libquickfix.so.3
libquickfix_jni.so        libquickfix_jni.so.8.0.0  libquickfix.so.3.1.0
libquickfix_jni.so.7      libquickfix.la            libquickfix.so.4
libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0  libquickfix.so            libquickfix.so.4.0.0

The 1.9.1 libraries are libquickfix.so.3.1.0 and
libquickfix_jni.so.7.1.0, while the 1.9.0 libraries had newer version
numbers: libquickfix.so.4.0.0 and libquickfix_jni.so.8.0.0 .


I'll try to delete the 1.9.0 libraries and recompile.

OS = RedHat Linux 8.0 (kernel 2.4.20)

Hans

[Quickfix-users] QuickFIX 1.9.1 Available

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

You know where, but in case you don't:  http://www.quickfixengine.org/

This fixes some problems reported with 1.9.0.  You should get this if 
you are using MySQL, STLPort, or currencies.  This should also fix 
compilation problems people were seeing with SUNPro and some versions 
of Visual Studio.  Documentation is now included in the installation 
docs for SUNPro, and the pretty collaboration diagrams are back.  
Release notes here: 
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=267968

One important change to take note is the XML that comes out of 
Message::toXML is in a slightly different format.  A field used to come 
out like this:

<field name="Text" value="Whatever value that is in this field"/>

Now, it comes out like this:

<field name="Text"><![CDATA[Whatever value that is in this 
field]]></field>

This is so we can handle characters in field values that could 
otherwise make the produces XML invalid.

--oren

Re: [Quickfix-users] Re: Quickfix-users digest, Vol 1 #178 - 1 msg

[Joerg T. <Joe...@ma...>]

Hans Bausewein wrote:
> Thanks. I'll modify the examples a bit now. First using MySQL instead of
> the file store.
> 
> 
> I've noticed some log4j errors on the console from Banzai:
>   log4j:ERROR No appenders could be found for category (Banzai).
>   log4j:ERROR Please initialize the log4j system properly.

Check whether the configuration file log4j.properties can be found using 
your Java CLASSPATH and make sure that it contains sensible settings, e.g.

quickfix/src/java/log4j.properties

So add .../quickfix/src/java to your CLASSPATH or copy log4j.properties 
somewhere your CLASSPATH points to.

Cheers, Jörg

-- 
Joerg Thoennes
                                http://macd.com
Tel.: +49 (0)241 44597-24      Macdonald Associates GmbH
Fax : +49 (0)241 44597-10      Lothringer Str. 52, D-52070 Aachen

Re: [Quickfix-users] Re: Quickfix-users digest, Vol 1 #178 - 1 msg

[Hans B. <han...@ma...>]

On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 13:07, Murray Smigel wrote:
> On Monday 13 September 2004 23:46, 
> qui...@li... wrote:
> 
> >
> > Message: 1
> > From: Hans Bausewein <han...@ma...>
> > To: qui...@li...
> > Date: 13 Sep 2004 14:37:38 +0200
> > Subject: [Quickfix-users] Example result: "Incorrect data format for value"
> > ?
> >
> **
> I don't believe that ordermatch handles market orders. It does not have a 
> contra side order to do the match. Ordermatch seems to match two orders that 
> are in its book. Try submitting crossing limit orders.
> mds

I read the Java source code of Executor and found...

From 'examples/executor/java/src/Application.java':

        if(ordType.getValue() != OrdType.LIMIT)
            throw new IncorrectTagValue(ordType.getField());

so I entered a Limit order and that worked. Even got an execution report
on the execution page.

Thanks. I'll modify the examples a bit now. First using MySQL instead of
the file store.


I've noticed some log4j errors on the console from Banzai:
  log4j:ERROR No appenders could be found for category (Banzai).
  log4j:ERROR Please initialize the log4j system properly.


How do I do that?

Hans

[Quickfix-users] QuickFIX 1.9.0 Available

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

QuickFIX 1.9.0 is now available at http://www.quickfixengine.org/

http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php? 
group_id=37535&release_id=266040

First of all, the release is *much* faster.  By doing some extensive  
profiling and with the help of some contributors, in particular Caleb  
Epstein and Kritstopher Peterson, we have radically improved our  
message parsing and generation capabilities.  Run the performance tests  
on 1.8.0 and 1.9.0 and you'll see what I mean.

Also, we have the long awaited support for week long sessions.   
Everybody who has been connecting to the CME with QuickFIX can throw  
their custom hacks away.  John Dahl over at the CME was even gracious  
enough to do a little testing.

Also, we have added the SessionQualifier tag.  This allows you to have  
sessions with identical BeginString, SenderCompID and TargetCompID, yet  
still be different sessions.  Thank you to Pasquale d'Aloise for the  
idea.

There are a bunch of other little fixes.  Remaining VB.NET compilation  
problems have been addressed.  Made an effort to make sure QF will  
compile under SunPRO.  An improvement to the Session for handling  
continuously high traffic and more.

--oren

[Quickfix-users] Re: Quickfix-users digest, Vol 1 #175 - 1 msg

[Joel N. <joe...@gm...>]

Have you tried looking at http://openadaptor.org?  

Perhaps, you can use OpenAdaptor to the connect to your internal
systems and use QuickFix to implement the FIX interface.


On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 20:51:20 -0700,
qui...@li...
<qui...@li...> wrote:
> Send Quickfix-users mailing list submissions to
>         qui...@li...
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         qui...@li...
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         qui...@li...
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Quickfix-users digest..."
> 
> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX FAQ: http://www.quickfixengine.org/wikifix/index.php?QuickFixFAQ
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Does QuickFix implement Message Queue mechanism to make sure all messages are delivered ? (Frank)
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 1
> From: "Frank" <fr...@di...>
> To: <qui...@li...>
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 18:46:05 -0700
> Organization: DAS
> Subject: [Quickfix-users] Does QuickFix implement Message Queue mechanism to make sure all messages are delivered ?
> 
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> 
> ------=_NextPart_000_00AE_01C49053.F01BB710
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>         charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to make use of quickfix to replace the old fix gateway(ugly =
> code, not flexible, only support fix4.0) in my company.
> 
> I have many years of socket programming experience. Every time when I =
> write a tcp socket program, I'll worry about buffering of read and write =
> stream, queueing of messages ready to send, queueing of messages =
> received and waiting for handling. If I add such kinds of handling in =
> the socket program, the program will be really very stable and robust; =
> if not, errors will occur after it runs for some time.
> 
> My question is: Does QuickFix have such kinds of handling ? especially =
> message queue mechanism ?  May I borrow it to deal with other sockets =
> (My program is a fix gateway, one side connects trading system (not fix =
> protocol), one side connects ECN(fix protocol)) ?
> 
> QuickFix source code is so complicated that I can not figure it out by =
> myself right now.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> ------=_NextPart_000_00AE_01C49053.F01BB710
> Content-Type: text/html;
>         charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <DIV>Hi,</DIV>
> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
> <DIV>I'm trying to make use of quickfix to&nbsp;replace&nbsp;the old fix =
> 
> gateway(ugly code, not flexible, only support fix4.0) in my =
> company.</DIV>
> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
> <DIV>I have many years of socket programming experience. Every time when =
> I write=20
> a tcp socket program, I'll worry about buffering of read and write =
> stream,=20
> queueing of messages ready to send, queueing of messages received and =
> waiting=20
> for handling. If I add such kinds of handling in the socket program, the =
> program=20
> will be really very stable and robust; if not, errors will occur after =
> it runs=20
> for some time.</DIV>
> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
> <DIV>My question is: Does QuickFix have such kinds of handling =
> ?&nbsp;especially=20
> message queue mechanism ? &nbsp;May I borrow it to deal with other =
> sockets (My=20
> program is a fix gateway, one side&nbsp;connects trading system (not fix =
> 
> protocol), one side connects ECN(fix protocol)) ?</DIV>
> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
> <DIV>QuickFix source code is so complicated that I can not figure it out =
> by=20
> myself right now.</DIV>
> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
> <DIV>Thanks.</DIV>
> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>
> 
> ------=_NextPart_000_00AE_01C49053.F01BB710--
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
> 
> End of Quickfix-users Digest
> 


-- 
=======================================================
jo...@na... * wir...@na... 
Think Different! (www.apple.com/thinkdifferent)

[Quickfix-users] Does QuickFix implement Message Queue mechanism to make sure all messages are delivered ?

[Frank <fr...@di...>]

Hi,

I'm trying to make use of quickfix to replace the old fix gateway(ugly =
code, not flexible, only support fix4.0) in my company.

I have many years of socket programming experience. Every time when I =
write a tcp socket program, I'll worry about buffering of read and write =
stream, queueing of messages ready to send, queueing of messages =
received and waiting for handling. If I add such kinds of handling in =
the socket program, the program will be really very stable and robust; =
if not, errors will occur after it runs for some time.

My question is: Does QuickFix have such kinds of handling ? especially =
message queue mechanism ?  May I borrow it to deal with other sockets =
(My program is a fix gateway, one side connects trading system (not fix =
protocol), one side connects ECN(fix protocol)) ?

QuickFix source code is so complicated that I can not figure it out by =
myself right now.

Thanks.

Re: [Quickfix-users] Perl bindings

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

Well we already have python bindings which were generated by swig.  The 
interface file is quickfix/src/python/quickfix.i directory.  You can 
probably use that to get started.  There is some python specific code 
in there for exception handling, so you that will need to be rewritten 
for perl, but everything else should work.  You can probably just pull 
that code out to get something running, though thrown exceptions will 
crash the interpreter.

Also, I had spent some time on the swig mailing list and they made 
several changes to accommodate some of the features used by QuickFIX.  
You will want to pull swig from CVS and use that.  The newest release 
version will not work.

--oren

On Aug 17, 2004, at 2:58 PM, Blain Sadler wrote:

> QuickFIX Documentation: 
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX FAQ: 
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/wikifix/index.php?QuickFixFAQ
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just spent a couple hours fooling around with SWIG trying to create 
> perl bindings.  No success yet :-)  Before I delve in too far I was 
> wondering if anyone had already tried this, and if they had any 
> success.  Any suggestions /comments/ recommendations/ fortellings of 
> doom?  This is not a terribly important project, just hoping to write 
> some automated tests for our OMS system in perl and it would be nice 
> to leverage quickfix to do it.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Blain
>
> -- 
> Blain Sadler
> Software Developer
> TradeDesk Software Corporation
> 8 Diane Drive
> Essex Junction, VT 05452-4008
> phone: (802) 655-2777
> e-mail: bla...@tr...
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
> 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
> Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
> http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>

[Quickfix-users] Perl bindings

[Blain S. <bla...@tr...>]

Hi all,

Just spent a couple hours fooling around with SWIG trying to create perl 
bindings.  No success yet :-)  Before I delve in too far I was wondering 
if anyone had already tried this, and if they had any success.  Any 
suggestions /comments/ recommendations/ fortellings of doom?  This is 
not a terribly important project, just hoping to write some automated 
tests for our OMS system in perl and it would be nice to leverage 
quickfix to do it.

Thanks in advance,

Blain

-- 
Blain Sadler
Software Developer
TradeDesk Software Corporation
8 Diane Drive
Essex Junction, VT 05452-4008
phone: (802) 655-2777
e-mail: bla...@tr...

RE: [Quickfix-users] Message Rejected: Tag appears more than once:269

[Steve P. <spi...@tr...>]

Sorry, my ignorance,
Here are the messages

<20040814-00:53:38, FIX.4.2:TMLautofill->PATS, outgoing>
=20
(8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D152=0135=3DV=0134=3D69=0149=3DTMLautofill=0152=3D20040=
814-00:53:38.391=0156=3DPATS=01
146=3D1=0155=3DEURIBOR=01167=3DFUT=01200=3D200406=01207=3DLIFFE=01262=3DM=
ARKETDATAID=01263=3D0=01264=3D1=012
67=3D2=01269=3D0=01269=3D1=0110=3D065=01)

<20040814-00:53:38, FIX.4.2:TMLautofill->PATS, incoming>
=20
(8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D178=0135=3DW=0134=3D253=0149=3DPATS=0152=3D20040814-00=
:53:38=0156=3DTMLautofill=0155=3D
EURIBOR=01167=3DFUT=01200=3D200406=01207=3DLIFFE=01262=3DMARKETDATAID=012=
68=3D2=01269=3D0=01270=3D97.01=01
271=3D41=01290=3D1=01269=3D1=01270=3D97.015=01271=3D19=01290=3D1=0110=3D0=
01=01)

<20040814-00:53:38, FIX.4.2:TMLautofill->PATS, event>
  (Message 253 Rejected: Tag appears more than once:269)

We are using FIX 4.2 and quickfix-1.8.0


Steve Pickering
  Trend Management Limted
p: 604-683-7244
f:  604-683-7055
e: spi...@tr...


-----Original Message-----
From: Joerg Thoennes [mailto:Joe...@ma...]=20
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 11:34 PM
To: spi...@tr...
Cc: qui...@li...
Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] Message Rejected: Tag appears more than
once:269

 > When sending an outgoing MarketDataRequest the returned incoming =
message
> is rejected by quickfix if I ask for multiple MDEntryType fields.
>=20
> Message Rejected: Tag appears more than once:269

Steve, please post the received message or the incoming and outgoing=20
lines from the QuickFIX logs.  Otherwise, it is difficult to guess.

Which QuickFIX version are you using?  Which DataDictionary did you=20
specify in your config file?

Cheers, J=F6rg

--=20
J>oerg Thoennes
                                http://macd.com
Tel.: +49 (0)241 44597-24      Macdonald Associates GmbH
Fax : +49 (0)241 44597-10      Lothringer Str. 52, D-52070 Aachen

Re: [Quickfix-users] Message Rejected: Tag appears more than once:269

[Joerg T. <Joe...@ma...>]

 > When sending an outgoing MarketDataRequest the returned incoming message
> is rejected by quickfix if I ask for multiple MDEntryType fields.
> 
> Message Rejected: Tag appears more than once:269

Steve, please post the received message or the incoming and outgoing 
lines from the QuickFIX logs.  Otherwise, it is difficult to guess.

Which QuickFIX version are you using?  Which DataDictionary did you 
specify in your config file?

Cheers, Jörg

-- 
J>oerg Thoennes
                                http://macd.com
Tel.: +49 (0)241 44597-24      Macdonald Associates GmbH
Fax : +49 (0)241 44597-10      Lothringer Str. 52, D-52070 Aachen

[Quickfix-users] Message Rejected: Tag appears more than once:269

[Steve P. <spi...@tr...>]

When sending an outgoing MarketDataRequest the returned incoming message is
rejected by quickfix if I ask for multiple MDEntryType fields.

 

Message Rejected: Tag appears more than once:269

Steve Pickering
spi...@tr...

 

Re: [Quickfix-users] Customize configuration file

[<que...@bn...>]

Hi,

You can declare a global variable in the main file :

      FIX::SessionSettings gc_Settings ;

               gc_Settings =3D new  FIX::SessionSettings(file) ;

And then use this variable where you want in your code, by externalising it
for example.

extern FIX::SessionSettings gc_Settings ;

... OnCreate(...)
{

 FIX::Dictionary dictionary =3D gc_Settings->get(SessionID) ;
  toto  =3D dictionary.getString(  FIX::CONF_PARAM ) ;
}


cheers,

Quentin




Internet
gar...@vi...@lists.sourceforge.net - 12/08/2004 15:20


Please respond to gar...@vi...

Sent by:    qui...@li...

To:    quickfix-users

cc:


Subject:    [Quickfix-users] Customize configuration file


QuickFIX Documentation:
http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
QuickFIX FAQ: http://www.quickfixengine.org/wikifix/index.php?QuickFixFAQ
QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html


Hi,

I'm starting a quite big trading project, and i'm glad i found quickfix for
it seems to be exactly what i was looking for. I hope to be able to spend
part of the time quickfix will save me helping to improve the project, but
at this moment i have a question:

I need to add a new entry to the configuration file to each session
definition. I'd need to access the configuration file or (better) the
SessionSetings object to get the new entry's value from my Application, in
onCreate method to be more specific. Is there a way to figure out this or i
should tweak quickfix code to get it?

Thanks and cheers for such a good work (and please forgive my "spanglish").

Guillermo Arbeiza



****************************** AVISO LEGAL ******************************

La informaci=F3n contenida en este mensaje es para uso exclusivo de su
destinatario. No debe copiarse, transmitirse a terceros ni guardarse por
estos =FAltimos, salvo autorizaci=F3n del remitente.

Puede contener informaci=F3n confidencial o legalmente protegida cuyo r=E9g=
imen
legal de utilizaci=F3n no se ve afectado por el hecho de que haya sido
enviada por correo electr=F3nico.

Su env=EDo por error a una persona distinta de su destinatario real no
implica que se haya modificado tal destinatario ni supone renuncia a su
eventual car=E1cter confidencial o al r=E9gimen legal que rija su utilizaci=
=F3n.

Cualquier opini=F3n expresada en este mensaje vincular=E1 exclusivamente a =
la
persona que lo haya remitido, excepto cuando el mensaje establezca lo
contrario y el remitente est=E9 autorizado para establecer que dichas
opiniones vincular=E1n a esta entidad.

En el supuesto de que este correo se recibiera por error, rogamos procedan
a borrarlo, sin reenviarlo a terceros ni conservarlo en cualquier soporte y
nos informen inmediatamente llamando al tel=E9fono 34 91 5892123 o a la
direcci=F3n de correo electr=F3nico remitente. Gracias.

****************************** DISCLAIMER ******************************

The information contained in this message is for the exclusive use of the
named person. It can not be copied, transmitted to third parties or stored
by the latter, except if authorised by the sender.

It may contain confidential or legally privileged information whose legal
regime is not affected by the fact that this information has been sent by
e-mail.

Its erroneous transmission to a person other than the real named person
neither implies any modification of this named person nor a renunciation of
the eventual confidentiality or legal regime affecting the use of concerned
message.

Any views expressed in this message are binding exclusively upon the
individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender
is authorised to bind this entity.

If you receive this message in error, please delete it without transmitting
it to any third party or keeping it in any form and notify us immediately
either by phone (34 91 5892123) or using the e- mail address of the sender.
Thank You.




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Quickfix-users mailing list
Qui...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users






This message and any attachments (the "message") is
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential.=20
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and=20
immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with=20
its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole=20
or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet
can not guarantee the integrity of this message.=20
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not=20
therefore be liable for the message if modified.=20

                ---------------------------------------------

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le=20
"message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses=20
destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce=20
message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir=20
immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce=20
message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion=20
ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf=20
autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas=20
d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses
filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce=20
message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.