quickfix-users — QuickFIX user support

Re: [Quickfix-users] ODBC in .Net build?

[George M. C. <geo...@qu...>]

I am using the following configuration settings:

OdbcLogConnectionString="DATABASE=quickfix;DRIVER={SQL 
Server};SERVER=DATASERVER;Uid=xx;Pwd=yy;"
OdbcStoreConnectionString="DATABASE=quickfix;DRIVER={SQL 
Server};SERVER=DATASERVER;Uid=xx;Pwd=yy;"

When I try to rn my Fix app I get this error:

System.Runtime.InteropServices.SEHException: External component has 
thrown an exception.
   at QuickFix.OdbcStoreFactory.create(SessionID sessionID)
   at MessageStoreFactory.create(MessageStoreFactory* , SessionID* 
sessionID)
   at FIX.SocketAcceptor.{ctor}(SocketAcceptor* , Application* , 
MessageStoreFactory* , SessionSettings* , LogFactory* )
   at QuickFix.SocketAcceptor..ctor(Application application, 
MessageStoreFactory factory, SessionSettings settings, LogFactory log
Factory, MessageFactory messageFactory)
   at qim.trading.qd.QuickFixDummyAcceptor.Main(String[] args) in 
C:\qim\projects\qim.trading.qd\QuickFixDummyAcceptor.cs:line 38
   at qd_cmd.qd_cmd.Main(String[] args) in 
C:\qim\projects\qim.trading.qd\qd_cmd\qd_cmd.cs:line 44

Is this familiar to anyone?

Oren Miller wrote:

>You must have HAVE_ODBC defined in config_windows.h.
>
>I'm not sure this is strictly necessary to keep requiring as I believe
>all modern Windows distributions come with ODBC.  Can anyone confirm?
>
>--oren
>
>  
>
>>Hi,
>>   I would like to clarify something regarding the new ODBC store and 
>>logging capability. I am using the .Net quickfix binaries, and I
>>    
>>
>cannot 
>  
>
>>locate the ODBC classes anywhere in those dlls. Does ODBC support 
>>require building the source distribution with the MSSQL preprocessor 
>>flag set?
>>    
>>
>
>  
>

Re: [Quickfix-users] ODBC in .Net build?

[George M. C. <geo...@qu...>]

I am trying to build in VS 2005. I added the directories that hold the 
files from the msxml msi installer and odbc32.lib, but strangely I get a 
hundred or so messages complaining about the header file locations when 
I try to compile the .Net wrapper project. An example would be:

Error    1    fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 
'quickfix/exceptions.h': No such file or directory    
c:\tools\quickfix\quickfix-1.12.4\quickfix\src\.net\Exceptions.h    29   

I go to the Exceptions.h file referenced, and the include directive 
looks like this:

#include "quickfix/exceptions.h"

I simply unzipped the quickfix 1.12.4 archive onto my c: drive. I am not 
sure why these paths would be unreachable. But then, I have never used 
VS C++ except to build some very simple projects with very few external 
dependencies.

Oren Miller wrote:

>QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
>QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>You must have HAVE_ODBC defined in config_windows.h.
>
>I'm not sure this is strictly necessary to keep requiring as I believe
>all modern Windows distributions come with ODBC.  Can anyone confirm?
>
>--oren
>
>  
>
>>Hi,
>>   I would like to clarify something regarding the new ODBC store and 
>>logging capability. I am using the .Net quickfix binaries, and I
>>    
>>
>cannot 
>  
>
>>locate the ODBC classes anywhere in those dlls. Does ODBC support 
>>require building the source distribution with the MSSQL preprocessor 
>>flag set?
>>    
>>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
>opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
>http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>_______________________________________________
>Quickfix-users mailing list
>Qui...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>
>  
>

Re: [Quickfix-users] ODBC in .Net build?

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

You must have HAVE_ODBC defined in config_windows.h.

I'm not sure this is strictly necessary to keep requiring as I believe
all modern Windows distributions come with ODBC.  Can anyone confirm?

--oren

> Hi,
>    I would like to clarify something regarding the new ODBC store and=20
> logging capability. I am using the .Net quickfix binaries, and I
cannot=20
> locate the ODBC classes anywhere in those dlls. Does ODBC support=20
> require building the source distribution with the MSSQL preprocessor=20
> flag set?

[Quickfix-users] ODBC in .Net build?

[George M. C. <geo...@qu...>]

Hi,
   I would like to clarify something regarding the new ODBC store and 
logging capability. I am using the .Net quickfix binaries, and I cannot 
locate the ODBC classes anywhere in those dlls. Does ODBC support 
require building the source distribution with the MSSQL preprocessor 
flag set?

thx
George Coles

[Quickfix-users] QuickFIX 1.12.4 is available

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

QuickFIX 1.12.4 is available at http://www.quickfixengine.org

Release notes at http://www.quickfixengine.org/NEWS

Primary purpose of this release is to fix some severe stability problems
that were present in 1.12.3 in both the .NET and gcc builds.  These
problems are addressed in this release.  I've taken 1.12.3 out of
distribution because I believe the bugs are serious enough that this
version is not adequate for production use.

We also added some extra protection in the .NET API.  When calling
Dispose on an Initiator/Acceptor, stop will be called first.  This will
make disposing on an object that is still running less tragic.

There are also some fixes in here for the Ruby API repeating group
support.

The .NET api now supports getSessions on the SessionSettings object.
SessionSettings objects can also be output as a string.  The output will
be in the same format as a typical QuickFIX config file.  This allows
you to generate a config file based off of a programatically created
SessionSettings object.

Several other minor issues are addressed in this release.  See the notes
for more details.

--oren

[Quickfix-users] Nested Group Issue

[RichardWalter <ric...@jp...>]

Hi=20
I have been using QuickFix for some time successfully but  am currently
having some issues getting messages with repeating groups to work properly.

I am creating a MarketDataRequest

Here is the code

                Dim mdsr As QuickFix44.MarketDataRequest =3D New
QuickFix44.MarketDataRequest(reqID, reqType, reqDepth)
                mdsr.setField(reqUpdateType)=20

                ' add MDEntryTypes group requesting bid and offer prices
                Dim mdEntryTypeGroup As New
QuickFix44.MarketDataRequest.NoMDEntryTypes
                mdEntryTypeGroup.set(New
QuickFix.MDEntryType(QuickFix.MDEntryType.BID))
                mdsr.addGroup(mdEntryTypeGroup)
                mdEntryTypeGroup.set(New
QuickFix.MDEntryType(QuickFix.MDEntryType.OFFER))
                mdsr.addGroup(mdEntryTypeGroup)

                ' now add the instrument info we require market data for
                Dim noRelatedSymGroup As New
QuickFix44.MarketDataRequest.NoRelatedSym
                noRelatedSymGroup.set(New QuickFix.Symbol("[N/A]"))
                noRelatedSymGroup.set(New
QuickFix.SecurityID("DE0001135226"))
                noRelatedSymGroup.set(New
QuickFix.SecurityIDSource(QuickFix.SecurityIDSource.ISIN_NUMBER))
                mdsr.addGroup(noRelatedSymGroup)

now this appears to work fine except the message i send is not correctly
representing the noRelatedSym group

Here is what gets sent

8=3DFIX.4.4=019=3D178=0135=3DV=0134=3D59=0143=3DY=0149=3DONSITE_RTFI=0152=
=3D20060912-09:39:03.924=0156=3DBRIDGE_RTFI=01122=3D20060912-09:39:03.874=
=0122=3D4=0148=3DDE0001135226=0155=3D[N/A]=01146=3D1=01262=3Dtest=01263=3D1=
=01264=3D1=01265=3D0=01267=3D2=01269=3D0=01269=3D1=0110=3D059=01

You can see that the RelatedSym group is sent out of order, i.e. the
NoRelatedSym(146) tag is after the SecurityID(48), SecurityIDSource(22) and
Symbol(55) tags

I am configured to use a data dictionary and am using the supplied FIX44.xm=
l
as the DataDictionary

So that is my sender issue

On th receiver i get an error as shown below, I have also seen a out of
order message complaining about the 146 tag being to late in the message

8=3DFIX.4.4=019=3D123=0135=3D3=0134=3D42=0149=3DBRIDGE_RTFI=0152=3D20060912=
-09:39:04.044=0156=3DONSITE_RTFI=0145=3D59=0158=3DTag
appears more than once=01371=3D269=01372=3DV=01373=3D13=0110=3D026=01

The reciver is also using a data dictionary and the same Fix44.xml file as
DataDictionary

Is there something fundamental i am not understanding here with regard to
getting repeating group support working?

Thanks,

Richard




--=20
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Nested-Group-Issue-tf22=
58264.html#a6264050
Sent from the QuickFIX - User forum at Nabble.com.

[Quickfix-users] QuickFIX 1.12.3 Available

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

QuickFIX 1.12.3 is now available at http://www.quickfixengine.org
=20
You can get the release notes for all versions here:
http://www.quickfixengine.org/NEWS

=46ixed some remaining socket problems.

Logons are sent immediately after connection, instead of waiting up to a
second between when the connection is established and the logon message
is actually sent.

New configuration setting, PersistMessages which defaults to Y resulting
in default behavior of storing all outgoing messages.  This is useful if
you want to persist state, but have no need to resend messages and want
to get rid of the overhead of persisting them.

=46ixed bugs in python and ruby APIs that manifested themselves as random
crashes due to some object being garbage collected too early.  The
Python and Ruby APIs are now quite usable, stable, and full featured.

Configuration settings are case insensitive.  More usage of the global
logging facility.

See the full release notes for more.

[Quickfix-users] RES: .NET Can not open bodyfile ... unreleased resources

[Alex <al...@ec...>]

 
	Oren,

	You remember what you have done to correct this problem?


--
Alex Araujo
Banif Banco de Investimento

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Oren Miller [mailto:or...@qu...] Enviada em: Tuesday,
September 05, 2006 10:07 AM
Para: Alex
Cc: qui...@li...;
qui...@li...
Assunto: Re: [Quickfix-users] .NET Can not open body file ... unreleased
resources

This was fixed a long time ago.  What version of QuickFIX are you using?

--oren

> 	Oren, months ago Francis Gingras send you a project demonstrating a 
> release resource problem in QuickFix. Have you seen what's causing 
> this?

[Quickfix-users] QuickFIX Log Viewer 1.1.0

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

QuickFIX Log Viewer 1.1.0 is available at http://www.quickfixengine.org

This version adds functionality to export Files and Views.  Currently
supported formats are FIX, XML, and CSV.

[Quickfix-users] Logon problem with quickfixj

[amit s. <ami...@ya...>]

Hi,
 I am using quickfixj for my project however the counter party is using quickfix.
 We are facing the problem at the startup.Immediately after the logon is complete then quickfixj again tries to send the logon message. 
 Is this happening because of latency gap in quickfix and quickfixj.
 
 Please help.
   Thanks,
 Amit Soni


 				
---------------------------------
 Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers 
 Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Yahoo! Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW

Re: [Quickfix-users] [Quickfix-developers] Validate Message......

[Eranga S. <pe...@ri...>]

Thanks Bill,

But my requirement is slight differ. Because my message did not contain
Standard header or tailor tags. I need to validate message without header or
tailor tags. But I think datadictionary validate method need complete
message. 

Is there a way?

BR,
Eranga


-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Robert [mailto:rob...@ra...] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 12:38 PM
To: Eranga Samararathna
Subject: RE: [Quickfix-developers] Validate Message......

Hi Eranga

I do something similiar in my application and the function doing the
check looks as following:

  try
  {
    FIX::DataDictionary dict(p_session.getDataDictionary());
    FIX::Message msg(p_content, dict);
    dict.validate(msg);  // throws if msg not valid
    if(!FIX::Session::sendToTarget( msg ))
      LOG(Warn) << "Message accepted but temporarly unable to
transmit:\n" << p_content;
    return Answer::Ok;
  }
  catch( FIX::SessionNotFound& )
  {
    LOG(Error) << "Session not found";
    return Answer::NotFound;
  }
  catch( FIX::FieldNotFound& e )
  {
    LOG(Error) << "Tag " << e.field << " not found";
    return Answer::BadRequest;
  }
  catch( FIX::TagNotDefinedForMessage& e )
  {
    LOG(Error) << "Tag " << e.field << " not defined for message";
    return Answer::BadRequest;
  }
  catch( FIX::InvalidTagNumber& e )
  {
    LOG(Error) << "Tag " << e.field << " not defined";
    return Answer::BadRequest;
  }
  catch( FIX::IncorrectTagValue& e)
  {
    LOG(Error) << "Value of tag " << e.field << " is incorrect (out of
range)";
    return Answer::BadRequest;
  }
  catch( FIX::RequiredTagMissing& e )
  {
    LOG(Error) << "Required tag " << e.field << " missing";
    return Answer::BadRequest;
  }

Basically in all cases of "BadRequest" I simply give it back to the
originating system, including the text written to LOG(error).

Regards
Robert



 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: qui...@li... 
> [mailto:qui...@li...] On 
> Behalf Of Eranga Samararathna
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 8:24 AM
> To: qui...@li...; 
> qui...@li...
> Subject: [Quickfix-developers] Validate Message......
> 
> QuickFIX Documentation: 
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
> 
> 



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/438 - Release Date: 9/5/2006

[Quickfix-users] Validate Message......

[Eranga S. <pe...@ri...>]

Hi,

 

What is the correct way of validate required fields? In my system users
upload bulk of orders through a GUI and

I want to validate that order before send to exchange. If any of those order
miss required field I have to inform it before send to exchange.

What the correct way of doing this? Is there way to get collection of
required tags for particular fix version message type?

 

BR,

 

Eranga

Re: [Quickfix-users] QFJ:Does the method copyFrom of MessageComponentcorrect?

[Steve B. <sb...@sm...>]

Hello,

I found the problem with the component group copy. It's been assigned
to issue QFJ-64 and fixed in the trunk. You can see the file diffs in
the issue description.

Regards,

Steve

[Quickfix-users] RES: .NET Can not open body file ... unreleased resources

[Alex <al...@ec...>]

	OK, probably the error was reintroduced by some other change. You
remember what you have done to correct this problem?


--
Banif Banco de Investimento
Av. Presidente Juscelino Kubitschek n=BA 1.700  - 15=BA andar - S=E3o =
Paulo, SP -
CEP 04552-080
Tel.: (55) (11) 3074-8046 -  Fax: (55) (11) 3074-8140
Email: al...@ec... =20
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Oren Miller [mailto:or...@qu...]=20
Enviada em: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:07 AM
Para: Alex
Cc: qui...@li...;
qui...@li...
Assunto: Re: [Quickfix-users] .NET Can not open body file ... unreleased
resources

This was fixed a long time ago.  What version of QuickFIX are you using?

--oren

> 	Oren, months ago Francis Gingras send you a project demonstrating a=20
> release resource problem in QuickFix. Have you seen what's causing=20
> this?

Re: [Quickfix-users] [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......

[VP M. IT A. E. T. <ass...@gm...>]

We have been using Quickfix/J (in production 2 counter parties) for well
over 1 year now.
We had used Quickfix Classic with JNI and moved over to pure Java. No major
side effect
or performance degradtion.

The env. is linux/jboss/jmx. You can search to get some preliminary
distribution posted
to this newsgroup.

cheers
--
rk



On 9/5/06, Eranga Samararathna <pe...@ri...> wrote:
>
> QuickFIX Documentation:
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>
>
>
>  Hi,
>
>
>
> Is any one bench mark the QuickFix vs QuickFix/j? How is the performance
> difference of these two systems?
>
> Are there any organizations use QuickFix/ j for their production systems?
>
>
>
>
>
> BR,
>
>
>
> Eranga
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>
>

[Quickfix-users] RES: .NET Can not open body file ... unreleased resources

[Alex <al...@ec...>]

	The latest: 1.12.2.


--
Alex Araujo
Banif Banco de Investimento
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Oren Miller [mailto:or...@qu...] 
Enviada em: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:07 AM
Para: Alex
Cc: qui...@li...;
qui...@li...
Assunto: Re: [Quickfix-users] .NET Can not open body file ... unreleased
resources

This was fixed a long time ago.  What version of QuickFIX are you using?

--oren

> 	Oren, months ago Francis Gingras send you a project demonstrating a 
> release resource problem in QuickFix. Have you seen what's causing 
> this?

Re: [Quickfix-users] .NET Can not open body file ... unreleased resources

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

This was fixed a long time ago.  What version of QuickFIX are you using?

--oren

> 	Oren, months ago Francis Gingras send you a project demonstrating a
> release resource problem in QuickFix. Have you seen what's causing  
> this?

[Quickfix-users] QFJ:Does the method copyFrom of MessageComponent correct?

[Lin L. <le...@gm...>]

The code in my project:
Parties parties = order.getParties();
the order has the right value of Parties,but the variable "parties" is empty
when it gets value by invoking order.getParties().

I trace into the code of QFJ,I found this method maybe something wrong:
The red color code maybe:fileds.isSetField(groupFields[i]))

Is it?

 //MessageComponent
    public void copyFrom(FieldMap fields) {
        try {
            int[] componentFields = getFields();
            for (int i = 0; i < componentFields.length; i++) {
                if (fields.isSetField(componentFields[i])) {
                    setField(componentFields[i], fields.getField
(componentFields[i]));
                }
            }
            int[] groupFields = getGroupFields();
            for (int i = 0; i < groupFields.length; i++) {
                if (isSetField(groupFields[i])) {
                    setGroups(groupFields[i], fields.getGroups
(groupFields[i]));
                }
            }
        } catch (FieldNotFound e) {
            // should not happen
        }
    }

-- 
Lin Lejiang

Re: [Quickfix-users] [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......

[Eranga S. <pe...@ri...>]

Thanks Toby.

 

We are going to use QuickFix or QuckFix on some performance critical
application. Currently we use Quickfix via JNI wrapper. 

 

BR,

 

Eranga

 

  _____  

From: Shepheard, Toby (London) [mailto:Tob...@ml...] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 12:23 PM
To: Eranga Samararathna; qui...@li...
Subject: RE: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......

 

I can't help you with the benchmarking as I've not done this, but you'd need
to consider whether you're comparing the straight C++ version of QuickFix,
or QuickFix via one of the wrappers (eg JNI). I'd also take ease of
development/support into consideration as well as performance.

 

We do use QFJ in a production environment, and I've had no problems with it
at all. I should caveat that, as it's not running in a performance-critical
environment and it's under a very light load, but for our purposes it's been
ideal and I've not heard any suggestions that it can't handle much higher
loads. As always you should of course test for yourself as everybody's
environment differs.

 

Rgds,

Toby

-----Original Message-----
From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
Eranga Samararathna
Sent: 05 September 2006 05:05
To: qui...@li...;
qui...@li...
Subject: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......

Hi,

 

Is any one bench mark the QuickFix vs QuickFix/j? How is the performance
difference of these two systems? 

Are there any organizations use QuickFix/ j for their production systems? 

 

 

BR,

 

Eranga

  _____  

If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the
sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain
or redistribute it. Click here  <http://www.ml.com/email_terms/> for
important additional terms relating to this e-mail.
http://www.ml.com/email_terms/

  _____  

Re: [Quickfix-users] [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......

[Shepheard, T. \(London\) <Tob...@ml...>]

I can't help you with the benchmarking as I've not done this, but you'd
need to consider whether you're comparing the straight C++ version of
QuickFix, or QuickFix via one of the wrappers (eg JNI). I'd also take
ease of development/support into consideration as well as performance.
=20
We do use QFJ in a production environment, and I've had no problems with
it at all. I should caveat that, as it's not running in a
performance-critical environment and it's under a very light load, but
for our purposes it's been ideal and I've not heard any suggestions that
it can't handle much higher loads. As always you should of course test
for yourself as everybody's environment differs.
=20
Rgds,
Toby

	-----Original Message-----
	From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
Eranga Samararathna
	Sent: 05 September 2006 05:05
	To: qui...@li...;
qui...@li...
	Subject: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......
=09
=09

	Hi,

	=20

	Is any one bench mark the QuickFix vs QuickFix/j? How is the
performance difference of these two systems?=20

	Are there any organizations use QuickFix/ j for their production
systems?=20

	=20

	=20

	BR,

	=20

	Eranga
--------------------------------------------------------

If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the =
sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, =
retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms =
relating to this e-mail.     http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
--------------------------------------------------------

[Quickfix-users] [ANN] QuickFIX/J 1.0.3 Released

[Steve B. <sb...@sm...>]

Release Notes - QuickFIX/J - Version 1.0.3

** Bug
    * [QFJ-48] - Fix class path in examples scripts
    * [QFJ-54] - Occasional NPE in block method during acceptor start.
    * [QFJ-56] - Support null LogFactories.
    * [QFJ-57] - Make QFJ timer thread a daemon.
    * [QFJ-59] - Documentation: "initiator" was misspelled in the sample =

                 configuration=20

** Improvement
    * [QFJ-61] - Extend SessionState to track whether a Logout has=20
                 been received. Can be used in onLogout() to determine
                 if the logout was normal or not.

Thanks to J=F6rg Th=F6nnes, Toli Kuznets, Graham Miller, Andr=E9 =
Malenfant,=20
and Markus Khouri for their assistance in this release cycle.

Files can be download at...

http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3D163099

More information at http://www.quickfixj.org.

Steve Bate

[Quickfix-users] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......

[Eranga S. <pe...@ri...>]

Hi,

 

Is any one bench mark the QuickFix vs QuickFix/j? How is the performance
difference of these two systems? 

Are there any organizations use QuickFix/ j for their production systems? 

 

 

BR,

 

Eranga

[Quickfix-users] RES: .NET Can not open body file ... unreleased resources

[Alex <al...@ec...>]

	Greg, 

	Have you found a solution for this problem?


--
Alex Araujo
Banif Banco de Investimento
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Chase [mailto:greg@...]
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 14:14
To: Francis Gingras
Cc: quickfix-users@...
Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] Re: Re: .NET Can not open bpdy file ...
unreleased resources

I too am having trouble releasing resources.  I'm using VS 2005, C# and .Net
2.0.  How should one properly close down an initiator in .Net?

The flow of my application is:

--------------------------------------
settings = new SessionSettings(configFile); storeFactory = new
FileStoreFactory(settings); logFactory = new FileLogFactory(settings);
messageFactory = new DefaultMessageFactory(); initiator = new
ThreadedSocketInitiator(this, storeFactory, settings, logFactory,
messageFactory);

...
initiator.start();
...
initiator.stop();
initiator = null;
settings = null;
storeFactory = null;
logFactory = null;
messageFactory = null;
----------------------------------------

At this point all of the four storage files are still locked (can't be
opened in notepad).  Forcing garbage collection doesn't help.

Is anyone able to successfully release ThreadedSocketInitiator resources in
.Net?

Greg


--
Gregory Chase
Managing Partner
Chase Capital Management, LLC

[Quickfix-users] RES: .NET Can not open body file ... unreleased resources

[Alex <al...@ec...>]

	Francis, I've tried your solution but it seems to not work. Please,
can you send me the piece of code where you release/reutilize the
SocketInitiator?

	Thank you!

--
Alex Araujo
Banif Banco de Investimento

-----Original Message-----
Greg,

This is what I use and it works fine with .NET 1.1 but with 2.0 you'll need
the latest sources from CVS.

socket.stop();
socket = null;
GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();

Francis

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Chase [mailto:greg@...]
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 14:14
To: Francis Gingras
Cc: quickfix-users@...
Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] Re: Re: .NET Can not open bpdy file ...
unreleased resources

I too am having trouble releasing resources.  I'm using VS 2005, C# and .Net
2.0.  How should one properly close down an initiator in .Net?

The flow of my application is:

--------------------------------------
settings = new SessionSettings(configFile); storeFactory = new
FileStoreFactory(settings); logFactory = new FileLogFactory(settings);
messageFactory = new DefaultMessageFactory(); initiator = new
ThreadedSocketInitiator(this, storeFactory, settings, logFactory,
messageFactory);

...
initiator.start();
...
initiator.stop();
initiator = null;
settings = null;
storeFactory = null;
logFactory = null;
messageFactory = null;
----------------------------------------

At this point all of the four storage files are still locked (can't be
opened in notepad).  Forcing garbage collection doesn't help.

Is anyone able to successfully release ThreadedSocketInitiator resources in
.Net?

Greg

On 5/2/06, Francis Gingras <francis@...> wrote:
>
>
> Tom,
>
> Just so you know, I sent a project to Oren that demonstrates the problem.
>
>
> Francis



--
Gregory Chase
Managing Partner
Chase Capital Management, LLC
 


--
Alex Araujo
Banif Banco de Investimento

Re: [Quickfix-users] .NET Can not open body file ... unreleased resources

[Alex <al...@ec...>]

	Oren, months ago Francis Gingras send you a project demonstrating a
release resource problem in QuickFix. Have you seen what's causing this?


	Alex
	

-----Original Message-----
Greg,

This is what I use and it works fine with .NET 1.1 but with 2.0 you'll need
the latest sources from CVS.

socket.stop();
socket = null;
GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();

Francis

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Chase [mailto:greg@...]
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 14:14
To: Francis Gingras
Cc: quickfix-users@...
Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] Re: Re: .NET Can not open bpdy file ...
unreleased resources

I too am having trouble releasing resources.  I'm using VS 2005, C# and .Net
2.0.  How should one properly close down an initiator in .Net?

The flow of my application is:

--------------------------------------
settings = new SessionSettings(configFile); storeFactory = new
FileStoreFactory(settings); logFactory = new FileLogFactory(settings);
messageFactory = new DefaultMessageFactory(); initiator = new
ThreadedSocketInitiator(this, storeFactory, settings, logFactory,
messageFactory);

...
initiator.start();
...
initiator.stop();
initiator = null;
settings = null;
storeFactory = null;
logFactory = null;
messageFactory = null;
----------------------------------------

At this point all of the four storage files are still locked (can't be
opened in notepad).  Forcing garbage collection doesn't help.

Is anyone able to successfully release ThreadedSocketInitiator resources in
.Net?

Greg

On 5/2/06, Francis Gingras <francis@...> wrote:
>
>
> Tom,
>
> Just so you know, I sent a project to Oren that demonstrates the problem.
>
>
> Francis



-- 
Gregory Chase
Managing Partner
Chase Capital Management, LLC
 


--
Alex Araujo
Banif Banco de Investimento