quickfix-developers

[Quickfix-developers] vs2005

[<an...@rh...>]

When sending a new order using the .net dlls;  I am getting a message
rejected return stating that required field 6 is missing.  Field 6 is
not required or even a part of a New Order - Single.  Another developer
in the office using .NET 2003 and the same dlls is not having this
problem.  Is this a problem with the .NET 2005 beta?  I thought I'd
check to see if anyone else is having similar problems before I go
through the process of uninstalling 2005 beta and reinstalling 2003.
=20
=20
Thank you,
=20
Andy=20
=20

RE: [Quickfix-developers] vs2005

[Dave L. <dav...@ma...>]

Hi Andy,
 
6 is a required field in the ExecutionReport (i.e. the response to the
NewOrderSingle). Is the rejection definitely in relation to the order?
 
Which version of FIX are you using? Do you have a tag 372 in the reject
message? If so, what is the value?
 
Are you using the same DataDictionary as the other developer?
 
Kind regards
 
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
an...@rh...
Sent: 02 June 2005 11:59
To: QuickFix
Subject: [Quickfix-developers] vs2005


When sending a new order using the .net dlls;  I am getting a message
rejected return stating that required field 6 is missing.  Field 6 is
not required or even a part of a New Order - Single.  Another developer
in the office using .NET 2003 and the same dlls is not having this
problem.  Is this a problem with the .NET 2005 beta?  I thought I'd
check to see if anyone else is having similar problems before I go
through the process of uninstalling 2005 beta and reinstalling 2003.
 
 
Thank you,
 
Andy 
 

RE: [Quickfix-developers] vs2005

[James C. D. <jc...@co...>]

Andy,
Do all the unit and acceptance tests run and pass when the assemblies are
built using VS 2005 beta?
Jim

  _____  

From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Dave
Linaker
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 6:42 AM
To: an...@rh...; 'QuickFix'
Subject: RE: [Quickfix-developers] vs2005


Hi Andy,
 
6 is a required field in the ExecutionReport (i.e. the response to the
NewOrderSingle). Is the rejection definitely in relation to the order?
 
Which version of FIX are you using? Do you have a tag 372 in the reject
message? If so, what is the value?
 
Are you using the same DataDictionary as the other developer?
 
Kind regards
 
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
an...@rh...
Sent: 02 June 2005 11:59
To: QuickFix
Subject: [Quickfix-developers] vs2005


When sending a new order using the .net dlls;  I am getting a message
rejected return stating that required field 6 is missing.  Field 6 is not
required or even a part of a New Order - Single.  Another developer in the
office using .NET 2003 and the same dlls is not having this problem.  Is
this a problem with the .NET 2005 beta?  I thought I'd check to see if
anyone else is having similar problems before I go through the process of
uninstalling 2005 beta and reinstalling 2003.
 
 
Thank you,
 
Andy 
 

Re: [Quickfix-developers] vs2005

[Richard P. <pro...@gm...>]
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