quickfix-developers

[Quickfix-developers] question about a change on the trunk to FileLog.h

[Mark T. K. <mke...@di...>]

i think mike gatny is in the process of adding a timestamp to the FIX message log.
one request: can it be under the control of an option?  i've got a pile of code
that is driven off of the existing (simple) format.  and while it isn't rocket
science to consume or strip off a leading timestamp, i am lazy :-).

thanks in advance.

/mark

This communication and any attachments may contain confidential/proprietary information and is intended for information purposes only. It is not an invitation or offer to purchase interests from Diamondback.  Any representation to the contrary is unintentional.  This communication is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachments is not permitted.  If you have received this in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this message.  All e-mails sent to or received from this address will be received by Diamondback's company e-mail system and is subject to archival and possible review by someone other than the recipient.  This notice is automatically appended to each e-mail message leaving Diamondback.

Re: [Quickfix-developers] question about a change on the trunk to FileLog.h

[Djalma R. d. S. F. <drs...@gm...>]

The new format is very interesting, and I agree that it would be still
better if controlled by configuration option.

But how about QuickFIX Log Viewer?  Is it already prepared for the new
format?

Thanks,
Djalma

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Mark T. Kennedy <
mke...@di...> wrote:

> QuickFIX Documentation:
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>
> i think mike gatny is in the process of adding a timestamp to the FIX
> message log.
> one request: can it be under the control of an option?  i've got a pile of
> code
> that is driven off of the existing (simple) format.  and while it isn't
> rocket
> science to consume or strip off a leading timestamp, i am lazy :-).
>
> thanks in advance.
>
> /mark
>
> This communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential/proprietary information and is intended for information
> purposes only. It is not an invitation or offer to purchase interests from
> Diamondback.  Any representation to the contrary is unintentional.  This
> communication is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed.
>  If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have
> received this document in error and that any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message or any attachments is not
> permitted.  If you have received this in error, please notify the sender
> immediately by e-mail and delete this message.  All e-mails sent to or
> received from this address will be received by Diamondback's company e-mail
> system and is subject to archival and possible review by someone other than
> the recipient.  This notice is automatically appended to each e-mail message
> leaving Diamondback.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
> Use priority code J8TL2D2.
>
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>

Re: [Quickfix-developers] question about a change on the trunk to FileLog.h

[Mike G. <mg...@co...>]

I didn't actually add the timestamp -- I did however add milliseconds to it.

-- 
Mike Gatny
Connamara Systems, LLC
http://www.connamara.com/

Re: [Quickfix-developers] question about a change on the trunk toFileLog.h

[Mark T. K. <mke...@di...>]

this kind of begs the question - how is this project structured?  i can see the sourceforge
subversion list of committers but that doesn't tell me what people are working on, what
is likely to be delivered (e.g. bug fixes, new features), when things will be delivered,
etc.

could someone (oren?) give an overview of:

1) the committers and what they're working on (maintenance, enhancements)?
2) the schedule for both major (new features) and minor (bug fixes) releases?

thanks in advance.

/mark

Mike Gatny wrote:
> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
> 
> I didn't actually add the timestamp -- I did however add milliseconds to it.
> 

This communication and any attachments may contain confidential/proprietary information and is intended for information purposes only. It is not an invitation or offer to purchase interests from Diamondback.  Any representation to the contrary is unintentional.  This communication is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachments is not permitted.  If you have received this in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this message.  All e-mails sent to or received from this address will be received by Diamondback's company e-mail system and is subject to archival and possible review by someone other than the recipient.  This notice is automatically appended to each e-mail message leaving Diamondback.