Well, the C# wrapper always had the basic functionality. It is just
some of the more advanced functionality had not been wrapped and was
inaccesible. The basic engine has always been usable. At this point I
would say that you can access 95% of the C++ functionality through C#.
Most of the remaining functionality is more low level functionality that
most people probably don't know about anyway. Oh, and probably some
obvious oversights that just have not yet been reported.
SmartQuant has been using quickfix through C# for over a year now
(http://www.smartquant.com). They have been reporting thier experiences
and we have steadily improved the API to its current level. Others have
also used it in production, but I cannot verify to what extent.
Hopefully they can share their experiences.
New functionality sometimes lags the C++ api, depending on the nature of
the feature. Any updates that do not affect the interface, instantly
benefit all APIs. Anything that requires complex interface updates, can
also involve complex updates to the wrappers. At this stage we are
pretty careful to ensure that any changes to the C++ api are immediately
reflected in the others. We are currently generating the python API
with SWIG, and we will certainly be investigating doing the same for
Java and C#.
--oren
Bill Shen wrote:
>QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
>QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>I just got the 1.11.0 release today, which supports .NET 2.0 and added
>methods for C# wrapper. So my revised questions are:
>
>1. Is the C# wrapper "complete" now?
>2. The community's experience in using QuickFIX/C# in production
>environments? If not C#, then C++?
>
>Thanks,
>Bill
>
>-----Original Message-----
>Message: 1
>From: "Bill Shen" <bs...@it...>
>To: <qui...@li...>
>Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:05:54 -0500
>Subject: [Quickfix-developers] Support for .NET 2.0 (C#)?
>
>Hi, I hope I can get some help regarding .NET support.
>
>1. Does anyone know a time frame for supporting .NET 2.0?
>2. Does anyone have experience making it compiling and working with
>.NET 2.0?
>3. I was told the C# wrapper layer was not complete. Any thought on
>that?
>4. Any community experience on using QuickFIX with .NET 1.1?
>
>
>
>Thanks a lot,
>
>Bill
>
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
>for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
>searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
>_______________________________________________
>Quickfix-developers mailing list
>Qui...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>
>
>
>
|
