Re: [Quickfix-developers] Session qualifier?

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

Those fields can change on a per message basis.  We cannot rely on those 
fields remaining constant inside a session.  Also the sessions themselves 
may not be expected the presence of such fields and may even reject them.

This came about because some feeds are running sessions with identical 
versions and comp ids while using the IP addresses or port number to 
disambiguate the session.  A very bad idea, but one that needed a work 
around.  Otherwise it would have required running multiple processes. You 
can read more about the problem here:

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=9120281
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5249494&forum_id=103

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Bate" <st...@te...>
To: <qui...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 8:11 AM
Subject: [Quickfix-developers] Session qualifier?


> QuickFIX Documentation: 
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX FAQ: http://www.quickfixengine.org/wikifix/index.php?QuickFixFAQ
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
> Hello,
>
> I am curious about why QF uses session qualifiers as part of
> the session identification rather than using subID and location.
>
> I'm looking into implementing third-party message routing in
> QFJ and this looks like the session qualifier technique might be
> a problem.
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>