RE: [Quickfix-developers] SocketConnection session registration BUG

[Sean K. <Sea...@Pi...>]

I'll have to take a look at the logging you mentioned. It would
definitely be an additional debugging property that would only
write logs if explicitly specified by the end-user.  So would
this DEBUG/TRACE level logging be a welcome addition?

--Sean

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joerg Thoennes [mailto:Joe...@ma...]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 4:02 PM
> To: Sean Kirkpatrick
> Cc: Oren Miller; qui...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] SocketConnection session=20
> registration
> BUG
>=20
>=20
> Sean Kirkpatrick wrote:
> > I'd like to offer my services to get some engine-level logging into
> > the next release of quickfix.  It's a great product and this would
> > help cover any remaining unknowns about messaging prior to=20
> establishing
> > a logon.  I'd be more than happy to follow any coding practices you
> > have so that the logging will integrate seamlessly.  Please=20
> let me know
> > if you are interested in this.
>=20
> Sean, I would suggest to use some Log4J-style logging=20
> library, e.g. log4cplus on=20
> sourceforge. Your engine level logging would be at DEBUG or=20
> TRACE level.
>=20
> Cheers, J=F6rg
>=20
> --=20
> Joerg Thoennes
>                                 http://macd.com
> Tel.: +49 (0)241 44597-24      Macdonald Associates GmbH
> Fax : +49 (0)241 44597-10      Lothringer Str. 52, D-52070 Aachen
>=20