Re: [Quickfix-developers] OrigSendingTime validation on PossDup messages
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
|
From: VP M. IT A. E. T. <ass...@gm...> - 2005-06-07 16:31:57
|
Steve OpenFIX is generating these to test and so it is perfectly logical for them to send non-sensical input and test how the system responds. How do we process such messages? -- RK On 6/7/05, Steve Bate <st...@te...> wrote: > QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/i= ndex.html > QuickFIX FAQ: http://www.quickfixengine.org/wikifix/index.php?QuickFixFAQ > QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I'm working on OpenFIX certification for the pure Java QuickFIX > implementation. One test that's giving me problems involves a message wit= h > PossDup=3DY and no OrigSendingTime. I notice that the session implementat= ion > only validates the PossDup-related fields when when the target sequence > number is lower than expected > (doPossDup() is only called from doTargetTooLow()). The OpenFIX test (FIX > 4.2) is sending a message with PossDup=3DY and a proper sequence number s= o the > PossDup verification code is not being called. >=20 > It seems a bit strange that PossDup=3DY in this scenario (normal sequence > numbers)? Is this a problem with QuickFIX or the OpenFIX test? Comments? >=20 > Steve >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you sho= tput > a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge t= rack? > If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy. > Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=3D20 > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-developers mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers > |