Re: [Quickfix-developers] OrigSendingTime validation on PossDup messages

[VP M. IT A. E. T. <ass...@gm...>]

Steve

OpenFIX is generating these to test and so it is perfectly logical for
them to send
non-sensical input and test how the system responds.

How do we process such messages?
--
RK

On 6/7/05, Steve Bate <st...@te...> wrote:
> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/i=
ndex.html
> QuickFIX FAQ: http://www.quickfixengine.org/wikifix/index.php?QuickFixFAQ
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>=20
> Hello,
>=20
> I'm working on OpenFIX certification for the pure Java QuickFIX
> implementation. One test that's giving me problems involves a message wit=
h
> PossDup=3DY and no OrigSendingTime. I notice that the session implementat=
ion
> only validates the PossDup-related fields when when the target sequence
> number is lower than expected
> (doPossDup() is only called from doTargetTooLow()). The OpenFIX test (FIX
> 4.2) is sending a message with PossDup=3DY and a proper sequence number s=
o the
> PossDup verification code is not being called.
>=20
> It seems a bit strange that PossDup=3DY in this scenario (normal sequence
> numbers)? Is this a problem with QuickFIX or the OpenFIX test? Comments?
>=20
> Steve
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.  How far can you sho=
tput
> a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge t=
rack?
> If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy.
> Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=3D20
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>