RE: [Quickfix-developers] RE: Intermittent disconnect problem
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
From: Bishop, B. <Bar...@gs...> - 2004-12-03 16:36:41
|
Hi Caleb, Thanks again for your advice. I've been distracted by other issues, but still managed to build quickfix 1.9.3 and 1.9.4 using the configure generated makefiles and gcc version 3.2.2. At the end of the day, I think it is safe to say that this does not work with gcc 2.95.2. You get a warning when running configure, but the warning doesn't do it justice! There are so many errors downstream that it might be better not to even attempt to support gcc 2.95.x. Oren, The 1.9.4 build is looking good and we have tested this in our QA environment. It reconnects very well (better than 1.4.0), but it will be some days before we run with this in our production environment. It would be nice if the strange disconnect problem goes away with this version, but it would be equally nice to see the better logging for these kind of events and learn something about what is happening. Again I will report back next week. Thanks again for everyone's input and thanks for a really good product. I know I've had problems building it, but once passed that stage the software has performed very well indeed. I would concur with one of your previous postings about the uptake of quickfix within the finance sector. There are a lot of people using it, which is most encouraging. Regards, barry -----Original Message----- From: Caleb Epstein [mailto:cal...@gm...] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 2:06 PM To: Bishop, Barry Cc: Oren Miller; qui...@li... Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] RE: Intermittent disconnect problem On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 13:51:41 -0000, Bishop, Barry <bar...@gs...> wrote: > If you don't mind me asking, did you have difficulties like this? > Maybe I am just incompetent. No, just a glutton for punishment :) Seriously though, gcc 2.95 is just too old if you want to compile standards-conforming C++ code. You should try the latest 3.3 or 3.4 version (we use 3.3.2 here with success on Linux and Solaris). You can drop STLport with these newer versions as well. Your life becomes much simpler, at the expense of needing to compile all your C++ code because name mangling changed. -- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com |