Re: [Quickfix-developers] SecurityIDSource
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
From: Oren M. <or...@qu...> - 2004-04-30 14:40:08
|
No reason that I can see. This will be fixed for the next release. On Apr 29, 2004, at 11:12 AM, Bjo...@ub... wrote: > Hello, > > I discovered a difference between QuickFix 1.7.0 and the FIX 4.3 > definition > of the > tag SecurityIDSource. Within QuickFix it is defined as CHAR whereas > the FIX > protocol > definition defines it as a string with the remark 100+ are reserved for > private security > identifications. > > Well, the fix of this problem is rather simple but it would be nice to > include the changes > for the next QF release. Or is there a specific reason why the > definition > is set to CHAR? > > Regards > > Bjoern Westerburg > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle > 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-developers mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers > |