RE: [SPAM] [Quickfix-developers] Infinite resend loop

[James C. D. <jc...@co...>]

Joerg,
I think the test case we need to create is as follows:

Message has CORRECT body length, check sum, and sequence number; but =
FAILS
message validation, e.g. MSgType=3D&.

Quick fix should send session level reject with clear reason, and =
increment
the incoming sequence number to expect on the next message.

Does this look correct? If so we should create a test for this test =
case. We
should also review the existing test cases to ensure that we have proper
coverage for message rejection.

Also are we considering all FIX versions or just 4.2 forward?


Jim
=20
James C. Downs
Connamara Systems, LLC
53 W. Jackson Blvd
Suite 1627
Chicago, IL 60604
312 - 282 - 7746
www.connamara.com

-----Original Message-----
From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of =
Joerg
Thoennes
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 4:52 AM
To: Oren Miller
Cc: Kovalenko, Michael; 'qui...@li...'
Subject: Re: [SPAM] [Quickfix-developers] Infinite resend loop

Oren Miller wrote:
> Ok.  This answers my question.  Looks like it's pretty clear what has=20
> to be done.  Thanks.

Oren,

does this mean your are planning to add session level rejects for all =
case
except body length or checksum errors? That would resolve some of our
customers complaints.

Thanks, J=F6rg

--
Joerg Thoennes
                                http://macd.com
Tel.: +49 (0)241 44597-24      Macdonald Associates GmbH
Fax : +49 (0)241 44597-10      Lothringer Str. 52, D-52070 Aachen


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1470&alloc_id=3D3638&op=3Dcli=
ck
_______________________________________________
Quickfix-developers mailing list
Qui...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers