Re: [SPAM] RE: [Quickfix-developers] ThreadedSocketInitiator

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

It is taken care of.

On Apr 14, 2004, at 3:19 PM, Shivakumar Keshavamurthy wrote:

> Thanks for your reply.
> =A0
> What=A0 I meant by Serialzation is actually syncronization of=A0=A0 =
requests=20
> from multiple clients(mltiple threads)=A0over a single session. Do I=20=

> need to explicitly synchronise my "Session.sendToTarget" method or is=20=

> it already taken care in the ThreadedSocketInitiator.
> =A0
> -Shivakumar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oren Miller [mailto:or...@qu...]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:16 PM
> To: Shivakumar Keshavamurthy
> Cc: qui...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] ThreadedSocketInitiator
>
> You can always call Session.sendToTarget without serialization. The=20
> Threaded refers to how it manages the sessions. With a regular=20
> SocketInitiator, all sessions share the same thread for processing=20
> events. With the ThreadedSocketInitiator, each session processes=20
> events in its own thread. This means that you would have to=20
> synchronize the callback methods to your Application class.
>
>
>  --oren
>
>
>  On Apr 14, 2004, at 12:54 PM, Shivakumar Keshavamurthy wrote:
>
>
>  Has anyone used=A0 "ThreadedSocketInitiator"?=A0 How is it different =
from=20
> the "SocketInitiator"?
> Can I call "Session.sendToTarget" from multiple threads without=20
> serialization?
>
>
> thanks
>
>
> shivakumar
>
>