RE: [Quickfix-developers] Fix Log Reader
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
From: Miller, O. <OM...@ri...> - 2004-02-02 21:42:38
|
I've already taken care of it. It wasn't that bad it's just that JNI = isn't nearly as easy to work with as managed C++. We are going to be releasing version 1.7 in conjunction with a newly = designed website being put together by Anne Lewis, a great designer over = at ThoughtWorks. A fix for that can still be added. For now it will be one that simply = solves the problem in the simplest manner which will be to just lock the = session mutex during resends. Future versions we may revisit some of = the longer term solutions proposed such as adding a proper send queue. --oren -----Original Message----- From: Joerg Thoennes [mailto:Joe...@ma...]=20 Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 6:21 AM To: Miller, Oren Cc: ro...@ri...; qui...@li... Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] Fix Log Reader Miller, Oren wrote: > Yes, of course it can be done. It's just harder. :) Oren, what I actually wanted to ask you is "please, do not forget Java." I am afraid I am still not fit enough to do it myself since I am still=20 lacking time to spent on QuickFIX. Is it possible to guess from .NET=20 changes what to do for Java? BTW, what are your plans for releasing 1.7? Is it still possible to add = some stuff; I think about the issue "Sending new message while resending = to INFINITY"? Cheers, J=F6rg |