RE: [Quickfix-developers] Wrong sequence reset handling ?

[James C. D. <jc...@co...>]

Enrico,
I think that acceptance test 10_MsgSeqNumEqual.def covers this =
situation.
This test passes in version 1.6 and the latest CVS code. Below is the
acceptance test. Do you think this covers your situation? Or am I =
missing
something? If not we can add a test (that would presumably fail) to =
describe
this issue.=20

# GapFill where MsgSeqNum is equal to the expected inbound MsgSeqNum

iCONNECT
I8=3DFIX.4.4=0135=3DA=0134=3D1=0149=3DTW=0152=3D<TIME>=0156=3DISLD=0198=3D=
0=01108=3D30=01
E8=3DFIX.4.4=019=3D57=0135=3DA=0134=3D1=0149=3DISLD=0152=3D00000000-00:00=
:00=0156=3DTW=0198=3D0=01108=3D30=0110=3D
0=01

# sequence reset with gap fill flag set to Y
I8=3DFIX.4.4=0135=3D4=0134=3D2=0149=3DTW=0152=3D<TIME>=0156=3DISLD=0136=3D=
20=01123=3DY=01
I8=3DFIX.4.4=0135=3D1=0134=3D20=0149=3DTW=0152=3D<TIME>=0156=3DISLD=01112=
=3DHELLO=01
E8=3DFIX.4.4=019=3D55=0135=3D0=0134=3D2=0149=3DISLD=0152=3D00000000-00:00=
:00=0156=3DTW=01112=3DHELLO=0110=3D0=01

iDISCONNECT=20


Jim
=20
James C. Downs
Connamara Systems, LLC
53 W. Jackson Blvd
Suite 1627
Chicago, IL 60604
312 - 282 - 7746
www.connamara.com

-----Original Message-----
From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of =
Enrico
Petracchi
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 3:06 AM
To: qui...@li...
Subject: [Quickfix-developers] Wrong sequence reset handling ?

Hi,
I'm working with quickfix 1.6.0 on windows platform.

I had a sequence reset request not handled correctly by quickfix in one =
of
my client acceptance tests.

Attached a time sequence ordered extraction of incoming, outgoing and =
event
qfx logs.

QFX receives an execution report and a sequence reset (sequence number =
679)
to sequence number 681

20040109-09:31:51.933 : [RCV]
8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D265=0135=3D8=0149=3DTLX=0156=3D9993=0134=3D678=0150=3D1=
=0152=3D20040109-09:31:52.027=01122
=3D20040109-09:22:47.084=0143=3DY=0111=3D20040109000502=0137=3D1743036=01=
17=3D63720=0120=3D0=0139=3D2=01
150=3D2=0155=3DBMW-U=0154=3D2=0138=3D0=0132=3D1000=0131=3D32.90000=01336=3D=
999=01151=3D0=0114=3D0=016=3D0.0=0160=3D200
40109-09:22:47.084=01439=3D0001=0193=3D15=0189=3D>MQPCKICM450331=0110=3D1=
54=01

20040109-09:31:51.943 : [RCV]
8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D100=0135=3D4=0149=3DTLX=0156=3D9993=0134=3D679=0150=3D1=
=0152=3D20040109-09:31:52.043=0143=3D
Y=01123=3DY=0136=3D681=0193=3D15=0189=3D>MQPCKICM450331=0110=3D012=01

From the event log the message is processed (correctly ?)

20040109-09:31:51.943 : [EVN] Processing QUEUED message: 679

When the next message with sequence number 681 is received qfx generate =
a
resend request=20

20040109-09:31:51.953 : [RCV]
8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D269=0135=3D8=0149=3DTLX=0156=3D9993=0134=3D681=0150=3D1=
=0152=3D20040109-09:31:52.043=0111=3D
20040109000508=0137=3D1743096=0117=3DITSW-AVV-MM0300000681=0120=3D0=0139=3D=
A=01150=3DA=0155=3DBMW-U=01
336=3D999=0138=3D1000=01151=3D1000=0114=3D0=016=3D0.0=0140=3D2=0144=3D32.=
90000=0159=3D0=0154=3D1=01109=3D1111
=0160=3D20040109-09:31:50.980=0193=3D15=0189=3D>MQPCKICM450331=0110=3D161=
=01

20040109-09:31:51.953 : [EVN] MsgSeqNum too low RECEIVED: 679 EXPECTED: =
680
PosDup: Y
20040109-09:31:51.953 : [EVN] MsgSeqNum too high RECEIVED: 681 EXPECTED: =
680
20040109-09:31:51.963 : [EVN] Sent ResendRequest FROM: 680 TO: 0

20040109-09:31:51.963 : [SND]
8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D105=0135=3D2=0134=3D281=0149=3D9993=0150=3DITSW-AVV-MM0=
3=0152=3D20040109-09:31:51.00
0=0156=3DTLX=017=3D680=0116=3D0=0189=3D>MQPCKICM450331=0193=3D15=0110=3D2=
05=01

Any suggestions ?=20

Thanks in advance=20
=09
		Enrico=20




-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on =
Open
Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity.
February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Quickfix-developers mailing list
Qui...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers