Re: [Quickfix-developers] Java version of quickfix?

[Miller, O. <OM...@ri...>]

It as come up before, and at one point one of the exhanges nearly =
commisioned the work.

The significant work involved would be in replicating the session logic =
and the message class. Since we have a pretty comprehensive functional =
test suite, a java port can be validated quite easily.

The downside would be the overhead of two implementations.  Keeping them =
synchronized would be a challenge.  I do, however, believe more people =
would contribute to a pure java project.

Short term it may be easier to work on a single threaded quickfix.

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Hornby <al...@an...>
To: quickfix-developers <qui...@li...>
Sent: Fri Aug 22 05:41:53 2003
Subject: [Quickfix-developers] Java version of quickfix?

Hi,

Has anyone looked at creating a pure java version of quickfix? As a lot
of code is auto generated from the XML descriptions perhaps this isn't
such a big task?

I've been getting some JVM crashes when using the JNI wrappers which I
think are due to synchronisation problems accessing C++ pointers - a
pure java version would get rid of those for good.

Cheers,
Alex.





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click =
here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0
_______________________________________________
Quickfix-developers mailing list
Qui...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers