Re: [Quickfix-developers] Server Thread

[Joerg T. <Joe...@ma...>]

> Yeah, any labeled build should be useable.  If the compile fails or any 
> tests fails the build won't get a label.

OK, then I will start to beta test...

> This is probably what we will use.  There are already some minimal junit 
> tests in the quickfix/src/java/test directory.  These were originally 
> used as the proof of concept to get the JNI stuff working, but they 
> should be expanded to be more comprehensive and should be run with the 
> build.

I will have a look at them.

> This will also make a future port to pure java much much easier 
> if the need arises.

Do you have concrete plans to do it? There is the util.concurrent package also used in JBoss
which would make the threading even more flexible using Java.

> Will probablly use NUnit for the .NET API.
>
> JavaDoc's would be good as well. We can also run Doxygen, which is 
> already being used for C++, against the java code (which supports 
> javadoc syntax).

OK, this would be more consistent. Can Doxygen do the transition from Java over
JNI to C++? That would be great.

Cheers, Jörg

-- 
Joerg Thoennes
                                http://macd.com
Tel.: +49 (0)241 44597-24      Macdonald Associates GmbH
Fax : +49 (0)241 44597-10      Lothringer Str. 52, D-52070 Aachen