Re: [Quickfix-developers] Server Thread

[Oren M. <ore...@ya...>]

>> I see from the repository that you have already done it. Can I check it >> out,
>> e.g. using BUILD_...-50? Yeah, any labeled build should be useable.  If the compile fails or any tests fails the build won't get a label.

>> Agreed. How about to use JUnit for Java? We use it for more than 2 >> years now.
>> In addition, I generated Java docs from the Java classes. OK, I had to >> increase
>> the memory of my JVM and got a 50Mbytes HTML trees, but it's really nice to
>> navigate. Should be part of the build script.

This is probably what we will use.  There are already some minimal junit tests in the quickfix/src/java/test directory.  These were originally used as the proof of concept to get the JNI stuff working, but they should be expanded to be more comprehensive and should be run with the build. This will also make a future port to pure java much much easier if the need arises.  Will probablly use NUnit for the .NET API. JavaDoc's would be good as well. We can also run Doxygen, which is already being used for C++, against the java code (which supports javadoc syntax).


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more