Re: [Quickfix-developers] Field missing in latest SecurityType.java

[Min T. <mi...@op...>]

I know the new changes are for FIX4.3 spec, but I am not sure putting those
fields of previous versions in deprecated directory is a proper way. Many
institutions are still using old version such as FIX4.0. For those users
this Java QuickFix simply does compile. I think one way to make them all
work is creating a new package calle "fix40to42" and move all classes under
deprecated to this new directory. Same idea can also apply to enumerations.
If you do want to deprecate those enumerations such as OPTION and FUTURE in
SecurityType.java, I believe commenting them out is better than deleting
them. At lease I can easily tell you did this intentionally and they were
all deprecated.


----- Original Message -----
From: <OM...@th...>
To: <mi...@op...>
Cc: <qui...@li...>;
<qui...@li...>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] Field missing in latest SecurityType.java


>
> Yes and yes.
>
> Deprecated fields are ones whose names have changed.  For instance
> LastShares became LastQty.  Although LastShares is in the deprecated
> subdirectory, it is in the same package of LastQty, so you don't need to
do
> anything special to pull them in.  Its just a way to show that its use has
> been dropped in newer versions of the spec.
>
> Having these allows you to use LastShares when dealing with older versions
> of the spec, and use LastQty when dealing with newer versions (in fact you
> must do it this way or the compiler will complain).
>
> Concerning FUT and OPT, this is in accordance with FIX 4.3:
>
> It is recommended that CFICode be used instead of SecurityType for
> non-Fixed Income instruments.
>
> Futures  and  Options  should  be  specified  using  the CFICode[461]
field
> instead  of  SecurityType[167]  (Refer  to  Volume  7 ? Recommendations
and
> Guidelines for Futures and Options Markets.")
>
> I   haven't   yet   determined   how  to  handle  deprecated
enumerations.
> Suggestions  would  be  welcome  from  anybody. For now, If you need to
use
> them, you can manually add them or just pass in "OPT" and "FUT".
>
>
> --oren
>
>
> |---------+----------------------------------------------->
> |         |           Min Tang <mi...@op...>    |
> |         |           Sent by:                            |
> |         |           qui...@li...ur|
> |         |           ceforge.net                         |
> |         |                                               |
> |         |                                               |
> |         |           02/28/2003 07:00 PM                 |
> |         |                                               |
> |---------+----------------------------------------------->
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------|
>   |
|
>   |       To:       qui...@li...
|
>   |       cc:
|
>   |       Subject:  [Quickfix-developers] Field missing in latest
SecurityType.java              |
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------|
>
>
>
>
> I cannot find Option and Future in latest SecurityType.java. Some classes
> under deprecated directory are still using by classes in other directory.
> Are these intentional updates?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers