Re: [Quickfix-developers] Field missing in latest SecurityType.java
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
From: <OM...@th...> - 2003-03-01 01:24:25
|
Yes and yes. Deprecated fields are ones whose names have changed. For instance LastShares became LastQty. Although LastShares is in the deprecated subdirectory, it is in the same package of LastQty, so you don't need t= o do anything special to pull them in. Its just a way to show that its use = has been dropped in newer versions of the spec. Having these allows you to use LastShares when dealing with older versi= ons of the spec, and use LastQty when dealing with newer versions (in fact = you must do it this way or the compiler will complain). Concerning FUT and OPT, this is in accordance with FIX 4.3: It is recommended that CFICode be used instead of SecurityType for non-Fixed Income instruments. Futures and Options should be specified using the CFICode[461] f= ield instead of SecurityType[167] (Refer to Volume 7 ? Recommendations= and Guidelines for Futures and Options Markets.") I haven't yet determined how to handle deprecated enumerati= ons. Suggestions would be welcome from anybody. For now, If you need to= use them, you can manually add them or just pass in "OPT" and "FUT". --oren |---------+-----------------------------------------------> | | Min Tang <mi...@op...> | | | Sent by: | | | qui...@li...ur| | | ceforge.net | | | | | | | | | 02/28/2003 07:00 PM | | | | |---------+-----------------------------------------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------| | = | | To: qui...@li... = | | cc: = | | Subject: [Quickfix-developers] Field missing in latest Secur= ityType.java | >--------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------| I cannot find Option and Future in latest SecurityType.java. Some class= es under deprecated directory are still using by classes in other director= y. Are these intentional updates? = |