RE: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFIX & J2EE

[Day, J. B. W. <Je...@ba...>]

Alex,

  I should probably start by saying that i/we are not using
  QuickFIX (i'm a lurker!) so the following is pure conjecture..

  This looks like the sort of problem that the J2EE connector
  architecture was designed to address

            http://java.sun.com/j2ee/connector/

  
  It's also possible you might be able to deploy an MBean into
  JBoss that then would call-out to your Session Bean business
  logic.

  I would be interesting to hear how other people have achieved
  this (in a J2EE compliant manner).

  One thing to consider is how you would address scalability
  issues, one potential solution (although much more work) would
  be to have your J2EE logic send/recieve JMS messages and have
  some sort of external gateway process acting as a bridge between
  your JMS Messages and QuckFIX. By separating the "FIX Gateway"
  you have opened the door to running multiple gateways and a
  fully clustered J2EE environment.

  You might also take a look at STPml (http://www.stpml.org/)
  which is an XML abstraction of the trading life-cycle and
  (should) map to FIX, SWIFT, etc.

Jem..

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Hornby [mailto:al...@an...]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 AM
To: quickfix-developers
Subject: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFIX & J2EE


Hi,

Has anyone here used the QuickFIX Java bindings to accept FIX messages
inside a J2EE app server? (In particular JBoss)

The reason behind this is that I'd like to have both incoming FIX and
web page requests affect Java "business objects".

Is anyone doing this - any sample code?

Cheers,
Alex.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Quickfix-developers mailing list
Qui...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers