[Quickfix-developers] New synchronization questions/comments

[Gene G. <mus...@ya...>]

I am looking at the ThreadedSocketAcceptor class, and
I have noticed that although onStop will likely to run
while onStart is looping, the access to m_stop and
m_socket is not guarded.

The shutdown solution that works in my applications
uses portable boost library code and condition
variables

class App : ...{
protected:
boost::condition m_ShutdownMonitor;
  boost::recursive_mutex m_AppMutex;
  bool m_Shutdown;

}
void App::Shutdown() {
  Locker lock (m_AppMutex);
  m_Shutdown = true;
  m_ShutdownMonitor.notify_all();   
}
void App::onRun() {
  Locker lock(m_AppMutex);
  while (!m_Shutdown) {
    m_ShutdownMonitor.wait(lock);
  }
}


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com