Re: [Quickfix-developers] Problem in SendingandRecievingmessagesusingQuickFIX
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
|
From: <OM...@th...> - 2002-08-12 13:09:00
|
Ah ok. There is no reason that I can think of that QuickFIX should have a
problem with those messages, but adding an explicit test case will tell us
for sure. Is it possible for you to send us the message that Sunguard is
generating for the long logon? If so we can plug that message straight into
our test suite and make sure that we are supporting it properly.
--oren
|---------+----------------------------------->
| | "Pramod.S.Warrier" |
| | @THOUGHTWORKS_COM |
| | Sent by: |
| | pramod@THOUGHTWORKS_COM |
| | |
| | |
| | 08/10/2002 12:23 AM |
| | |
|---------+----------------------------------->
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: OM...@th... |
| cc: PJS...@Th..., qui...@li..., |
| qui...@li... |
| Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] Problem in SendingandRecievingmessagesusingQuickFIX |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Hi,
I have got the reply from the SunGard support team regarding
the long
logon message. Following are the lines from mail that i received from
them.
"As for the long logon message. You can find its definition in
the
FIX
4.2 logon message definition. It is not mentioned as "long" logon, but
it contains an optional list of message types that are supported. When
using these optional fields, you get a logon message. When you don't,
the logon message is short."
I hope your query has been solved and I would really like to
know if
this could be the problem in communicating between the SunGard and
QuickFix Engine? Doesn't the QuickFix support Logon message with
optional fields included ?
Thanks and Regards,
Pramod.
OM...@th... wrote:
>
> Hmmm. I have to say I do not know what they are refering to, and I don't
> see that terminology anywhere in the spec. Is it possible you can get
some
> clarification from SunGuard on what that is? If you could also provide a
> sample of such a message that would be extremely useful as well.
>
> --oren
>(See attached file: pwarrier.vcf)
|