Re: [Quickfix-developers] Problem in SendingandRecievingmessagesusingQuickFIX
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
From: <OM...@th...> - 2002-08-12 13:09:00
|
Ah ok. There is no reason that I can think of that QuickFIX should have a problem with those messages, but adding an explicit test case will tell us for sure. Is it possible for you to send us the message that Sunguard is generating for the long logon? If so we can plug that message straight into our test suite and make sure that we are supporting it properly. --oren |---------+-----------------------------------> | | "Pramod.S.Warrier" | | | @THOUGHTWORKS_COM | | | Sent by: | | | pramod@THOUGHTWORKS_COM | | | | | | | | | 08/10/2002 12:23 AM | | | | |---------+-----------------------------------> >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: OM...@th... | | cc: PJS...@Th..., qui...@li..., | | qui...@li... | | Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] Problem in SendingandRecievingmessagesusingQuickFIX | >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Hi, I have got the reply from the SunGard support team regarding the long logon message. Following are the lines from mail that i received from them. "As for the long logon message. You can find its definition in the FIX 4.2 logon message definition. It is not mentioned as "long" logon, but it contains an optional list of message types that are supported. When using these optional fields, you get a logon message. When you don't, the logon message is short." I hope your query has been solved and I would really like to know if this could be the problem in communicating between the SunGard and QuickFix Engine? Doesn't the QuickFix support Logon message with optional fields included ? Thanks and Regards, Pramod. OM...@th... wrote: > > Hmmm. I have to say I do not know what they are refering to, and I don't > see that terminology anywhere in the spec. Is it possible you can get some > clarification from SunGuard on what that is? If you could also provide a > sample of such a message that would be extremely useful as well. > > --oren >(See attached file: pwarrier.vcf) |