Re: [Quickfix-developers] Problem in Sending and RecievingmessagesusingQuickFIX
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
|
From: <OM...@th...> - 2002-08-06 15:04:39
|
The other possibility is that SunGuard is sending a sequence number that is
lower than QuickFIX is expecting. This would cause QuickFIX to immediately
kill the connection.
--oren
"Pramod.S.Warrier"
@THOUGHTWORKS_COM To: OM...@th...
Sent by: cc: PJS...@Th..., qui...@li...,
pramod@THOUGHTWORKS_COM qui...@li...
Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] Problem in Sending and
RecievingmessagesusingQuickFIX
08/06/2002 09:05 AM
Hi,
Yes they are on different messages. And as you suggested, first the
problem was because of the Time not being
synchronised and that was displyed in the log file generated by the SunGard
Engine and in the quickfix logs also I used to
get the error message (Sending Time Problem).
But now I have syncronised the time and the error messages that I had
mailed you earlier were after making those changes.
Are there any other issues due to which such communication problems can
arise? I mean are there any reasons for the initiator
not recieving the messages that are sent to it ?
Besides I also have another query. I wanted to know if I could test the
messages that are being generated by my initiator
program without having to write the whole acceptor program ? I mean some
site or some other application which will take as
input any FIX messages generated by my initiator and give as output whether
the message is valid or not.
Thanks and Rgds,
Pramod.
OM...@th... wrote:
> Are they on different machines? First thing I would check is that their
> clocks are synchronized (by default within 120 seconds of each other).
> Alternatively you can turn this check off in QuickFIX by setting the
> CheckLatency config to N. You can also change the amount of acceptable
> latency by setting the MaxLatency field.
>
> I definately think it is time to institute some quality logging into
> QuickFIX...
>
> --oren
>
(See attached file: pwarrier.vcf)
|