[Quickfix-developers] Re: Comparitive analysis required.
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
From: <OM...@th...> - 2002-04-15 15:27:10
|
Ashish, No, that should not be the case. TargetSubID is a field on the header which can be set before you send a message out. Keep in mind that TargetSubID is not the same as TargetCompID which is the field that is in the configuration file. Which sub id you want to direct a message to is generally determined at run time and is not a static field. For instance if you were to send an order to the Singapore market, you can direct it as follows: FIX41::NewOrderSingle order; // add fields to order order.getHeader().set(FIX::TargetSubID("P")); FIX::Session::sendToTarget(order); This will use (P) as the target sub id. You can replace this with any other string to direct it to another market. All of this is assuming that TargetSubID is the field you need to set. If it turns out it is TargetCompID then you still only need one instance of QuickFIX, however you will need to have it instantiate multiple sessions. This is the nature of the protocol. Hope this helps. --Oren Miller, ThoughtWorks "ashish bhatnagar" <ashish_bhatnagar@mumbai To: <OM...@th...> .tcs.co.in> cc: Subject: Re: Comparitive analysis required. 04/15/02 07:40 AM Hi Oren !!, I am facing a problem using quickfix , see there are 6 target sub id's in the singapore market (CLOB.R/P/K/L/O)so will i have to use 6 different instances of ur fix engine to trade on 6 different target subid's cause the configuration file has TargetsubId as a parameter which can have only a single value..please advise. Regards, Ashish Bhatnagar ----- Original Message ----- From: <OM...@th...> To: <ash...@mu...> Sent: 11/04/2002 7:57 PM Subject: Re: Comparitive analysis required. > > Ashish, > > Thank you for your interest in QuickFIX. I don't think I can give you a > feature by feature analysis as I don't think it is appropriate for me to > speak for these other engine providers, however I can certainly send you > feature sheet for QuickFIX. It would also help me if you give me some idea > about your intended usage. This way I can elaborate on some of the > features that may be of more importance to you. I look forward to hearing > from you. > > --Oren Miller, ThoughtWorks > > > > > "ashish bhatnagar" > <ashish_bhatnagar@mumbai To: <om...@th...> > .tcs.co.in> cc: > Subject: Comparitive analysis required. > 04/09/02 01:11 AM > > > > > > > Hi Oren !!, > We at TCS are in the process of evaluating FIX engines , we > have evaluated a few including QuickFix , it would tremendously help us in > making a choice between QuickFix and other FIX engines if you could give us > a feature-by-feature comparision between these engines,and what benefits > does quickfix offer over these engines. > > Thanks and Regards, > Ashish Bhatnagar > > > |