Re: [Quickfix-users] [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......

[Shepheard, T. \(London\) <Tob...@ml...>]

I can't help you with the benchmarking as I've not done this, but you'd
need to consider whether you're comparing the straight C++ version of
QuickFix, or QuickFix via one of the wrappers (eg JNI). I'd also take
ease of development/support into consideration as well as performance.
=20
We do use QFJ in a production environment, and I've had no problems with
it at all. I should caveat that, as it's not running in a
performance-critical environment and it's under a very light load, but
for our purposes it's been ideal and I've not heard any suggestions that
it can't handle much higher loads. As always you should of course test
for yourself as everybody's environment differs.
=20
Rgds,
Toby

	-----Original Message-----
	From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
Eranga Samararathna
	Sent: 05 September 2006 05:05
	To: qui...@li...;
qui...@li...
	Subject: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......
=09
=09

	Hi,

	=20

	Is any one bench mark the QuickFix vs QuickFix/j? How is the
performance difference of these two systems?=20

	Are there any organizations use QuickFix/ j for their production
systems?=20

	=20

	=20

	BR,

	=20

	Eranga
--------------------------------------------------------

If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the =
sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, =
retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms =
relating to this e-mail.     http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
--------------------------------------------------------