Re: [Quickfix-users] 64-bit anyone?

[Mark T. K. <mke...@di...>]

Sean Kirkpatrick wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> Has anyone tried building Quickfix as a 64-bit binary?  Or run the 
> 32-bit binary on a 64-bit architecture?  I'm really just curious at 
> this point, but I'm sure this will become an issue within the next 
> year or so...
>
> Thanks,
> Sean
>
on fedora core 4 (x86_64), i have built a 32-bit library (v1.11.1) and 
run 32-bit binaries without
any problems.  i've since replaced it with a 64-bit build and run 64-bit 
binaries, also without
a problem.  caveat: my volume is low and i host only one FIX session per 
process, so i
doubt if i'm generating much concurrency.

/mark kennedy
diamondback capital



This communication and any attachments may contain confidential/proprietary information and is intended for information purposes only. It is not an invitation or offer to purchase interests from Diamondback.  Any representation to the contrary is unintentional.  This communication is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachments is not permitted.  If you have received this in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this message.  All e-mails sent to or received from this address will be received by Diamondback Capital Management's company e-mail system and is subject to archival and possible review by someone other than the recipient.  This notice is automatically appended to each e-mail message leaving Diamondback Capital Management.