RE: [Quickfix-users] Quickfix/j migration...

[Steve B. <sb...@sm...>]

=20
> It runs fine for an hour or so - the acceptor is sending=20
> market data messages, several per second.  The initiator is=20
> responding to these with order requests, which the acceptor=20
> is also fill/cancelling.  So, I guess there will not be=20
> heartbeats in that scenario - which is fine from my apps=20
> perspective.  In the log I sent earlier, you can see it sent=20
> a test request from the initiator, but got no response - if=20
> the acceptor is busy, does it ignore test requests? The error=20
> occurs on the initiator side (my app), so perhaps it's a=20
> problem with my app - coincidentally that's the same side=20
> that gets the problem with the quickfix JNI version mentioned=20
> in my other mails (on exeception violation).

I'm very close to releasing the QFJ Beta 3 which has a=20
completely reworked networking layer. I strongly recommend
building the CVS head (which is stable) or waiting for a
few days until I release the Beta 3.

The acceptor should respond to test requests even under
heavy load.

Steve