RE: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is connected

[Steve B. <sb...@sm...>]

Hello Lars,
=20
From looking at the JNI code it does appear that the initiators in the
JNI wrapper return an
array of SessionIDs. QFJ returns the actual sessions. This is an
unintentional difference in
the API.
=20
Oren, do you have a preference about whether to return SessionIDs or
Sessions from the
JNI API? If we want to leave it the way it is in the JNI layer, I'll
need to modify the initiators
(and acceptors?) in QFJ to return the same data types.=20
=20
The initiator concrete classes also have an isLoggedOn(SessionID) method
that is not
present in the Initiator interface. That might be useful for your
purposes.
=20
Steve Bate
Smart Trade Technologies
Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97
http://www.smart-trade.net/


________________________________

	From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
lar...@su...
	Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:40 AM
	To: qui...@li...
	Subject: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is
connected
=09
=09

	I'm using java and both quickfix\J and the regular native
interface. I'm using multiple sessions and are looking on a way to get
info on a specific session in the java environment.=20

	=20

	In the c/c++ environment the initiator/acceptor classes have
both the function getSessions() and getSession(arguments). But the Java
versions only have the getSessions() that returns the SessionID not the
actually session. =20

	=20

	Then my problem is that if I want to know if every session is
connected I for example want to use initiator.isConnected() to check
that every connection is connected or check every connection separately.


	The problem is that the isConnected() return true if any of the
connections is connected and that I havn't found a way to check that a
single connection is connected.

	=20

	Do I have to keep track of logon/logoff myself in java but not
in C/C++

	=20

	Lars