Re: [Quickfix-users] message rejected: required tag missing (with user-defined tag)

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

Do you have some sort of conditional test that only runs certain code 
when that field is present?

--oren

On Apr 29, 2005, at 8:21 AM, George M. Coles wrote:

> QuickFIX Documentation: 
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX FAQ: 
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/wikifix/index.php?QuickFixFAQ
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
> I have defined several user-defined tags, the type-safe way, in c#. 
> You will find the definitions inlined below. There is one tag that 
> causes a rejection required tag missing error when the target tries to 
> ACK my new orders - that tag is IdTrade, seen in the code snippet 
> directly below. None of the other user-defined tags causes this error. 
> When I comment out the code that sets idTrade, the error goes away.
>
> What is different about that tag? I even changed its tag number, and 
> tried changing the order in which I set the fields, and the issue 
> still happens. How does a user-defined tag become to be considered a 
> required tag by quickfix???
>
>
>            //custom fields
>            IdTrade idTrade = new IdTrade( tr.idTRADE );
>            order.setField( idTrade );
>
>            WTR1 wtr1 = new WTR1( (double)tr.WTR_1 );
>            order.setField( wtr1 );
>
>            Eliq1 eliq1 = new Eliq1( (double)tr.ELiq_1 );
>            order.setField( eliq1 );
>
>            Signal signal = new Signal( tr.Signal );
>            order.setField( signal );
>
>            DWRPV0 dwrpv0 = new DWRPV0( (double)tr.DWRPV0 );
>            order.setField( dwrpv0 );
>
>            DWRPV1 dwrpv1 = new DWRPV1( (double)tr.DWRPV_1 );
>            order.setField( dwrpv1 );
>
>            V61 v61 = new V61( (double)tr.V_6_1 );
>            order.setField( v61 );
>
> ////////custom field definitions
> namespace QuickFix
> {
>    //5823 - 5889 are unclaimed fields ACCORDING TO fixprotocol.org
>    public class WTR1 : DoubleField
>    {
>        public WTR1() : base(5823)
>        {
>        }
>
>        public WTR1(double data) : base(5823, data)
>        {
>        }
>    }
>
>    public class Eliq1 : DoubleField
>    {
>        public Eliq1() : base(5824)
>        {
>        }
>
>        public Eliq1(double value) : base(5824, value)
>        {
>        }
>    }
>
>    public class V61 : DoubleField
>    {
>        public V61() : base(5825)
>        {
>        }
>
>        public V61(double value) : base(5825, value)
>        {
>        }
>    }
>
>    public class Signal : DoubleField
>    {
>        public Signal() : base(5826)
>        {
>        }
>
>        public Signal(double value) : base(5826, value)
>        {
>        }
>
>    }
>
>    public class DWRPV0 : DoubleField
>    {
>        public DWRPV0() : base(5827)
>        {
>        }
>
>        public DWRPV0(double value) : base(5827, value)
>        {
>        }
>    }
>
>    public class DWRPV1 : DoubleField
>    {
>        public DWRPV1() : base(5828)
>        {
>        }
>
>        public DWRPV1(double value) : base(5828, value)
>        {
>        }
>    }
>
>    public class IdTrade : DoubleField
>    {
>        public IdTrade() : base(5829)
>        {
>        }
>
>        public IdTrade(double data) : base(5829, data)
>        {
>        }
>    }
> }
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans!
> Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net
> Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey
> Click here to start!  http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>